The Greek Referendum on Bailouts 2015

L. Papadopoulou
{"title":"The Greek Referendum on Bailouts 2015","authors":"L. Papadopoulou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3428890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Greek referendum on bailouts of 2015 the only winner was populism, with democracy and the referendum itself being the big losers, proving that the end result of populist responses to what is perceived as a ‘democratic deficit’ can only be a trivialisation of democracy itself. Not only did the SYRIZA-ANEL Government exhibit no prudence in the use of referendums, despite their allegedly positive stance towards them, but by spoiling and trivialising the institution as a whole, they gave the opponents of direct democratic instruments the best arguments against them. In other words, if one wanted to design a mock referendum, to undermine the institution as a whole, one would create one exactly like the Greek referendum of 2015, which is now often presented as a caricature and as a tool in the hands of demagogues.","PeriodicalId":132443,"journal":{"name":"European Economics: Political Economy & Public Economics eJournal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economics: Political Economy & Public Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3428890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Greek referendum on bailouts of 2015 the only winner was populism, with democracy and the referendum itself being the big losers, proving that the end result of populist responses to what is perceived as a ‘democratic deficit’ can only be a trivialisation of democracy itself. Not only did the SYRIZA-ANEL Government exhibit no prudence in the use of referendums, despite their allegedly positive stance towards them, but by spoiling and trivialising the institution as a whole, they gave the opponents of direct democratic instruments the best arguments against them. In other words, if one wanted to design a mock referendum, to undermine the institution as a whole, one would create one exactly like the Greek referendum of 2015, which is now often presented as a caricature and as a tool in the hands of demagogues.
2015年希腊纾困公投
在2015年希腊救助公投中,唯一的赢家是民粹主义,民主和公投本身是最大的输家,这证明民粹主义对所谓“民主赤字”的反应的最终结果只能是民主本身的平庸化。激进左翼联盟-民主联盟政府不仅在使用全民公决方面毫无谨慎,尽管他们据称对全民公决持积极态度,而且通过破坏和轻视整个制度,他们为反对直接民主工具的人提供了最好的论据。换句话说,如果有人想设计一场模拟公投,以破坏整个制度,那就应该设计一场与2015年希腊公投一模一样的公投,而希腊公投现在经常被当作讽刺漫画和煽动者手中的工具来呈现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信