Customer Loyalty Model Development of Pool-To-Pool Shuttle Service

B. Prihartono, Anies Sayyidatun Nisa, Hasrini Sari
{"title":"Customer Loyalty Model Development of Pool-To-Pool Shuttle Service","authors":"B. Prihartono, Anies Sayyidatun Nisa, Hasrini Sari","doi":"10.1145/3557738.3557834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pool-to-pool shuttle service business, both for tourist and business purposes, has continued to grow in recent years owing to the aggressive competition among shuttle services which forces shuttle services to better understand their customers’ loyalty. This study seeks to develop a customer loyalty model by considering several factors that influence loyalty such as customer satisfaction, loyalty programs, corporate image, service recovery, perceived safety, price, and service quality. In addition, the effect of differences in the purpose of using the shuttle service was tested on the customer loyalty model. The sample of 384 respondents who have used shuttle services in the last 12 months were used in this study. Sample were divided into two groups, customer for business/college/school purpose and for vacations purpose. Data analysis is performed using multigroup SEM analysis. The SEM results of both of the group show that the absolute fit of the model is adequate judging by the RMSEA value of 0,062 and 0,063 respectively for each group. CFI and TLI which were used as the incremental fit also reach the value of more than 0,9 for both groups which indicate a good incremental fit. Furthermore, from the results showed that there was a significant moderating effect of the difference in the purpose of using the shuttle service on the customer loyalty model. In the group with business/college/school goals, safety perception has no effect on customer satisfaction and company image has no effect on customer loyalty. Customer satisfaction in this group is proven to influence customer loyalty, but the relationship is not stronger than the group with the purpose of using the shuttle service for vacations. In the group with vacation destinations, the perception of safety influences customer satisfaction, but company image has no effect on customer loyalty. Customer satisfaction in this group is proven to influence customer loyalty with a stronger tendency compared to the other group.","PeriodicalId":178760,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Engineering and Information Technology for Sustainable Industry","volume":"11 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Engineering and Information Technology for Sustainable Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3557738.3557834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The pool-to-pool shuttle service business, both for tourist and business purposes, has continued to grow in recent years owing to the aggressive competition among shuttle services which forces shuttle services to better understand their customers’ loyalty. This study seeks to develop a customer loyalty model by considering several factors that influence loyalty such as customer satisfaction, loyalty programs, corporate image, service recovery, perceived safety, price, and service quality. In addition, the effect of differences in the purpose of using the shuttle service was tested on the customer loyalty model. The sample of 384 respondents who have used shuttle services in the last 12 months were used in this study. Sample were divided into two groups, customer for business/college/school purpose and for vacations purpose. Data analysis is performed using multigroup SEM analysis. The SEM results of both of the group show that the absolute fit of the model is adequate judging by the RMSEA value of 0,062 and 0,063 respectively for each group. CFI and TLI which were used as the incremental fit also reach the value of more than 0,9 for both groups which indicate a good incremental fit. Furthermore, from the results showed that there was a significant moderating effect of the difference in the purpose of using the shuttle service on the customer loyalty model. In the group with business/college/school goals, safety perception has no effect on customer satisfaction and company image has no effect on customer loyalty. Customer satisfaction in this group is proven to influence customer loyalty, but the relationship is not stronger than the group with the purpose of using the shuttle service for vacations. In the group with vacation destinations, the perception of safety influences customer satisfaction, but company image has no effect on customer loyalty. Customer satisfaction in this group is proven to influence customer loyalty with a stronger tendency compared to the other group.
泳池到泳池班车服务客户忠诚度模型的开发
泳池到泳池的班车服务业务,无论是出于旅游还是商业目的,近年来一直在持续增长,因为班车服务之间的激烈竞争迫使班车服务公司更好地了解客户的忠诚度。本研究透过考虑顾客满意、忠诚度计划、企业形象、服务复原、感知安全、价格及服务品质等影响忠诚度的因素,试图建立顾客忠诚度模型。此外,在顾客忠诚度模型上检验了使用班车服务目的差异的影响。在过去12个月里使用过班车服务的384名受访者的样本被用于这项研究。样本分为两组,客户为商业/大学/学校的目的和度假的目的。数据分析使用多组SEM分析进行。两组的SEM结果表明,从两组的RMSEA值分别为0.062和0.063来看,模型的绝对拟合是足够的。作为增量拟合的CFI和TLI在两组中也都达到了大于0,9的值,表明增量拟合良好。此外,从结果来看,穿梭服务使用目的的差异对顾客忠诚度模型有显著的调节作用。在有商业/大学/学校目标的群体中,安全感知对顾客满意度没有影响,公司形象对顾客忠诚度没有影响。这一群体的顾客满意度被证明会影响顾客忠诚度,但这种关系并不比以使用班车服务为度假目的的群体强。在有度假目的地的群体中,安全感知影响顾客满意度,但公司形象对顾客忠诚度没有影响。这一群体的顾客满意度对顾客忠诚的影响比另一群体更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信