Historical Aspects Of Constitutional Responsibility In Ukrainian Lands In 1917-1920

V. Knysh
{"title":"Historical Aspects Of Constitutional Responsibility In Ukrainian Lands In 1917-1920","authors":"V. Knysh","doi":"10.15330/apiclu.51.213-221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article explores the main aspects of legal consolidation of constitutional legal responsibility on Ukrainian lands in 1917-1920. In this case, the main attention is paid to the legislation of the Ukrainian People’s Republic (UNR) on this issue. \nOn the author’s conviction, the responsibility of state authorities and local selfgovernment of the UPR was characterized by the following features: \n1)     the consolidation at the level of the Constitution of the general and specific features of the constitutional and legal responsibility of the parliament of the UPR (NationalAssembly ofthe UPR). In particular, the common features ofthe constitutional legal responsibility of the Parliament of the UPR are their clear correspondence with the main functions: law-making (responsibility for the exercise of the functions of the legislative power) and personnel (constitutional and legal responsibility for the formation of executive and judicial authorities). Specific features of constitutional legal responsibility were expressed in the functions of exclusive constitutional rulemaking (amending the Constitution of the UPR by at least 3/5 of the votes of the present deputies; the authority to approve political and economic treaties concluded in the name of the UPR and to be responsible for their content and execution); economic and fiscal functions (the impossibility of collecting taxes without a decision of the National Assembly; the impossibility of establishing loans and pledging state property without a resolution of the National Assembly) emergency functions (responsibility for the National Assembly to form troops and law enforcement agencies of the state, for declaring war and peace) \n1)    legal consolidation in relation to the government (Council of People’s Ministers) of sole retrospective (negative) constitutional legal responsibility, which provides for constitutional legal sanctions against the ministers themselves, as well as collective retrospective (negative) constitutional legal responsibility, which provides for constitutional legal sanctions against the entire government; \n2)    Determination of constitutional legal responsibility (both positive and negative) for the administration of justice in the state by the General Court of the UPR; \n3)    approval of the constitutional and legal responsibility of local authorities for the control function of the ministers of the UPR in relation to the elected Councils and Administrations of communities, volosts and lands, as well as through the jurisdictional function of the justice authorities; \n4)    Conditionality of the constitutional and legal responsibility of the autonomous rights of national Unions with the exclusive competence of the National Unions and bodies representing them with functions of a fiscal and economic nature. \nSo, the basic principles of competence and constitutional legal responsibility of the organs of state power and local self-government of the UPR according to the Constitution of the UPR were closely related to the principle of separation of powers and other leading principles, corresponding models of a democratic, social and legal state. \nIt should also be noted that the normative consolidation of the foundations of constitutional legal responsibility (as well as other institutions of constitutional law of Ukraine) at the present stage of development of Ukrainian constitutionalism should be based not only on the current needs of state and law-making, but also certain positive historical and legal traditions, earlier existed on Ukrainian lands.","PeriodicalId":196689,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15330/apiclu.51.213-221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article explores the main aspects of legal consolidation of constitutional legal responsibility on Ukrainian lands in 1917-1920. In this case, the main attention is paid to the legislation of the Ukrainian People’s Republic (UNR) on this issue. On the author’s conviction, the responsibility of state authorities and local selfgovernment of the UPR was characterized by the following features: 1)     the consolidation at the level of the Constitution of the general and specific features of the constitutional and legal responsibility of the parliament of the UPR (NationalAssembly ofthe UPR). In particular, the common features ofthe constitutional legal responsibility of the Parliament of the UPR are their clear correspondence with the main functions: law-making (responsibility for the exercise of the functions of the legislative power) and personnel (constitutional and legal responsibility for the formation of executive and judicial authorities). Specific features of constitutional legal responsibility were expressed in the functions of exclusive constitutional rulemaking (amending the Constitution of the UPR by at least 3/5 of the votes of the present deputies; the authority to approve political and economic treaties concluded in the name of the UPR and to be responsible for their content and execution); economic and fiscal functions (the impossibility of collecting taxes without a decision of the National Assembly; the impossibility of establishing loans and pledging state property without a resolution of the National Assembly) emergency functions (responsibility for the National Assembly to form troops and law enforcement agencies of the state, for declaring war and peace) 1)    legal consolidation in relation to the government (Council of People’s Ministers) of sole retrospective (negative) constitutional legal responsibility, which provides for constitutional legal sanctions against the ministers themselves, as well as collective retrospective (negative) constitutional legal responsibility, which provides for constitutional legal sanctions against the entire government; 2)    Determination of constitutional legal responsibility (both positive and negative) for the administration of justice in the state by the General Court of the UPR; 3)    approval of the constitutional and legal responsibility of local authorities for the control function of the ministers of the UPR in relation to the elected Councils and Administrations of communities, volosts and lands, as well as through the jurisdictional function of the justice authorities; 4)    Conditionality of the constitutional and legal responsibility of the autonomous rights of national Unions with the exclusive competence of the National Unions and bodies representing them with functions of a fiscal and economic nature. So, the basic principles of competence and constitutional legal responsibility of the organs of state power and local self-government of the UPR according to the Constitution of the UPR were closely related to the principle of separation of powers and other leading principles, corresponding models of a democratic, social and legal state. It should also be noted that the normative consolidation of the foundations of constitutional legal responsibility (as well as other institutions of constitutional law of Ukraine) at the present stage of development of Ukrainian constitutionalism should be based not only on the current needs of state and law-making, but also certain positive historical and legal traditions, earlier existed on Ukrainian lands.
1917-1920年乌克兰土地上宪法责任的历史方面
本文探讨了1917-1920年乌克兰土地上宪法法律责任法律巩固的主要方面。在这种情况下,主要注意的是乌克兰人民共和国(UNR)关于这个问题的立法。根据作者的信念,国家当局和地方自治政府对普遍定期审议的责任具有以下特点:1)在宪法层面巩固了普遍定期审议议会(普遍定期审议国民大会)的宪法和法律责任的一般和具体特点。特别是,普遍定期审议中议会的宪法法律责任的共同特征是它们与主要职能的明确对应:立法(行使立法权职能的责任)和人事(组建行政和司法当局的宪法和法律责任)。宪法法律责任的具体特征体现在专门的宪法规则制定职能中(以至少3/5的现任代表投票修改普遍定期审议的宪法;有权批准以普遍定期审议的名义缔结的政治和经济条约,并对其内容和执行负责);经济和财政职能(没有国会的决定就不可能征税;没有国会的决议就不可能提供贷款和抵押国有财产)紧急职能(国会组建国家军队和执法机构的责任,宣布战争与和平的责任)1)与政府(人民部长会议)有关的法律巩固,只有追溯的(消极的)宪法法律责任;它规定了对部长本身的宪法法律制裁,以及集体追溯(负面)宪法法律责任,这规定了对整个政府的宪法法律制裁;2)由普遍定期审议的普通法院确定国家司法行政的宪法法律责任(正面和负面);3)批准地方当局的宪法和法律责任,以监督普遍定期审议部长对选举产生的理事会和社区、州和土地行政当局的控制职能,并通过司法当局的管辖职能;(四)国家联盟的自治权的宪法和法律责任具有条件性,国家联盟和代表它们行使财政和经济职能的机构具有专属权限。因此,普遍定期审议宪法规定的国家权力机关和地方自治机关职权和宪法法律责任的基本原则,与三权分立原则等主导原则密切相关,是民主国家、社会国家和法治国家的相应模式。还应该指出的是,在乌克兰宪政发展的现阶段,对宪法法律责任基础(以及乌克兰宪法的其他机构)的规范性巩固不仅应该基于当前国家和立法的需要,而且应该基于乌克兰土地上早期存在的某些积极的历史和法律传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信