Возможности видеокапсульной эндоскопии в диагностике воспалительных заболеваний кишечника

А. А. Ликутов, В. В. Веселов, Н А Притула, Б. А. Нанаева, Д. А. Мтвралашвили, A. A. Likutov, V. Veselov, N. A. Pritula, B. A. Nanaeva, D. A. Mtvralashvili
{"title":"Возможности видеокапсульной эндоскопии в диагностике воспалительных заболеваний кишечника","authors":"А. А. Ликутов, В. В. Веселов, Н А Притула, Б. А. Нанаева, Д. А. Мтвралашвили, A. A. Likutov, V. Veselov, N. A. Pritula, B. A. Nanaeva, D. A. Mtvralashvili","doi":"10.17116/ENDOSKOP201723223-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. Evaluation of the impact on the budget of the program for the provision of necessary medications (ONLS program) for the inclusion of a new drug vedolizumab for the treatment of adult patients with moderate or severe active ulcerative colitis (UC) and moderate or severe active Crohn’s disease (CD). Material and methods. The analysis provides a retrospective study based on published data. Based on the results of the auctions for the purchase of compared drugs, the size of the target population of the patients was calculated in the framework of ONLS. The calculation was carried out taking into account the proportion of drugs used for the therapy of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in the total volume of purchased inhibitors of TNF-a. For the target group identified, the budget load is determined with the gradual replacement of TNFa inhibitors with vedolizumab. The horizon of the study was 3 years. The calculations used the average tender prices for the package of the preparation for 2016. Results. It is established that the cost of 1 year of therapy with vedolizumab is lower than that for infliximab, adalimumab or golimumab. The inclusion of vedolizumab in ONLS implies the subsequent replacement of TNFa inhibitors by vedolizumab: in the first year in 11% of patients with UC and 15% of patients with CD, in the second year in 17 and 32%, respectively, in the 3rd year 28 and 43% respectively. This allows to reduce the budget impact for 3 years for the treatment of UC by 11,9 million rubles, and for CD therapy by 24,1 million rubles. With the increase in the share of vedolizumab on the market by replacing TNFa inhibitors, budgetary savings are increasing. Vedolizumab therapy is the most effective option in the treatment of IBD from a clinical and clinico-economic point of view in comparison with TNFa inhibitors. Conclusion. The inclusion of the drug vedolizumab in ONLS is pharmacoeconomically feasible. The use of vedolizumab in terms of Budget impact Analysis is preferable to the current treatment regimen including infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab and cerolizumab pegol.","PeriodicalId":311437,"journal":{"name":"Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/ENDOSKOP201723223-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim. Evaluation of the impact on the budget of the program for the provision of necessary medications (ONLS program) for the inclusion of a new drug vedolizumab for the treatment of adult patients with moderate or severe active ulcerative colitis (UC) and moderate or severe active Crohn’s disease (CD). Material and methods. The analysis provides a retrospective study based on published data. Based on the results of the auctions for the purchase of compared drugs, the size of the target population of the patients was calculated in the framework of ONLS. The calculation was carried out taking into account the proportion of drugs used for the therapy of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in the total volume of purchased inhibitors of TNF-a. For the target group identified, the budget load is determined with the gradual replacement of TNFa inhibitors with vedolizumab. The horizon of the study was 3 years. The calculations used the average tender prices for the package of the preparation for 2016. Results. It is established that the cost of 1 year of therapy with vedolizumab is lower than that for infliximab, adalimumab or golimumab. The inclusion of vedolizumab in ONLS implies the subsequent replacement of TNFa inhibitors by vedolizumab: in the first year in 11% of patients with UC and 15% of patients with CD, in the second year in 17 and 32%, respectively, in the 3rd year 28 and 43% respectively. This allows to reduce the budget impact for 3 years for the treatment of UC by 11,9 million rubles, and for CD therapy by 24,1 million rubles. With the increase in the share of vedolizumab on the market by replacing TNFa inhibitors, budgetary savings are increasing. Vedolizumab therapy is the most effective option in the treatment of IBD from a clinical and clinico-economic point of view in comparison with TNFa inhibitors. Conclusion. The inclusion of the drug vedolizumab in ONLS is pharmacoeconomically feasible. The use of vedolizumab in terms of Budget impact Analysis is preferable to the current treatment regimen including infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab and cerolizumab pegol.
的目标。评估纳入新药vedolizumab用于治疗中度或重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和中度或重度活动性克罗恩病(CD)的成人患者对提供必要药物(ONLS)计划预算的影响。材料和方法。该分析提供了一项基于已发表数据的回顾性研究。根据比较药品的拍卖购买结果,在ONLS框架下计算患者目标人群的规模。在进行计算时,考虑了用于治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)的药物在购买的TNF-a抑制剂总量中的比例。对于确定的目标组,预算负荷是通过逐渐用vedolizumab替代TNFa抑制剂来确定的。研究期限为3年。计算使用的是2016年准备工作包的平均投标价格。结果。经证实,vedolizumab治疗1年的成本低于英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗或戈利单抗。在ONLS中纳入vedolizumab意味着随后用vedolizumab替代TNFa抑制剂:第一年,11%的UC患者和15%的CD患者,第二年分别为17%和32%,第三年分别为28%和43%。这使得UC治疗的3年预算影响减少了1190万卢布,CD治疗减少了2410万卢布。随着vedolizumab替代TNFa抑制剂在市场上的份额增加,预算节省正在增加。与TNFa抑制剂相比,从临床和临床经济角度来看,Vedolizumab治疗是治疗IBD最有效的选择。结论。将vedolizumab纳入ONLS在药物经济上是可行的。在预算影响分析方面,使用vedolizumab优于目前的治疗方案,包括英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗、golimumab和cerolizumab pegol。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信