Research on modeling method of aeroengine on-board model based on flight data

Cheng Chen, Qiangang Zheng, Haibo Zhang
{"title":"Research on modeling method of aeroengine on-board model based on flight data","authors":"Cheng Chen, Qiangang Zheng, Haibo Zhang","doi":"10.1117/12.2672792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to build an aeroengine on-board model with full envelope, full state, high accuracy and high real-time, a modeling method based on flight data is proposed. This method builds state variable model based on component level model. Considering the influence of Reynolds number, power extraction, air bleed and other factors, the steady state model of the on-board model is modified based on regression analysis using flight data to reduce the modeling error caused by individual engine differences. At the same time, in order to compensate the residual steady-state error, a steady-state error model based on Gaussian Mixture Model Neural Network (GMM-NN) is established. Considering the need to reconstruct the speed sensor, the speed signal cannot be used as the scheduling variable to build a new scheduling variable, which has less dynamic error compared to taking fuel as the scheduling variable. Compared with the traditional model, the input of this model is only control variables and flight conditions, and it can reconstruct the signals of speed, pressure, temperature and other sensors. At the same time, it has the advantages of simple structure, no iterative calculation and high accuracy. Compared with flight data, the maximum dynamic error of compressor outlet total pressure of the new scheduling variable model is 3.564%, which is 4.13 times higher than the maximum relative error of 14.735% of the fuel scheduling model. In the verification of multi flight data, the average errors of LP rotor speed, HP rotor speed, compressor outlet total pressure and LP turbine outlet total temperature are 0.52%, 0.39%, 0.53% and 0.9% respectively, meeting the accuracy requirements of the project.","PeriodicalId":227528,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering (ICAICE 2022)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering (ICAICE 2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2672792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to build an aeroengine on-board model with full envelope, full state, high accuracy and high real-time, a modeling method based on flight data is proposed. This method builds state variable model based on component level model. Considering the influence of Reynolds number, power extraction, air bleed and other factors, the steady state model of the on-board model is modified based on regression analysis using flight data to reduce the modeling error caused by individual engine differences. At the same time, in order to compensate the residual steady-state error, a steady-state error model based on Gaussian Mixture Model Neural Network (GMM-NN) is established. Considering the need to reconstruct the speed sensor, the speed signal cannot be used as the scheduling variable to build a new scheduling variable, which has less dynamic error compared to taking fuel as the scheduling variable. Compared with the traditional model, the input of this model is only control variables and flight conditions, and it can reconstruct the signals of speed, pressure, temperature and other sensors. At the same time, it has the advantages of simple structure, no iterative calculation and high accuracy. Compared with flight data, the maximum dynamic error of compressor outlet total pressure of the new scheduling variable model is 3.564%, which is 4.13 times higher than the maximum relative error of 14.735% of the fuel scheduling model. In the verification of multi flight data, the average errors of LP rotor speed, HP rotor speed, compressor outlet total pressure and LP turbine outlet total temperature are 0.52%, 0.39%, 0.53% and 0.9% respectively, meeting the accuracy requirements of the project.
基于飞行数据的航空发动机机载模型建模方法研究
为了建立全包络、全状态、高精度、高实时性的航空发动机机载模型,提出了一种基于飞行数据的建模方法。该方法在构件级模型的基础上建立状态变量模型。考虑到雷诺数、抽功率、引气等因素的影响,利用飞行数据进行回归分析,对机载模型的稳态模型进行修正,以减少单个发动机差异造成的建模误差。同时,为了补偿剩余稳态误差,建立了基于高斯混合模型神经网络(GMM-NN)的稳态误差模型。考虑到速度传感器需要重构,不能将速度信号作为调度变量构建新的调度变量,与以燃油为调度变量相比,动态误差较小。与传统模型相比,该模型的输入仅为控制变量和飞行条件,可以重构速度、压力、温度等传感器的信号。同时具有结构简单、无需迭代计算、精度高等优点。与飞行数据相比,新调度变量模型的压缩机出口总压最大动态误差为3.564%,是燃油调度模型最大相对误差14.735%的4.13倍。在多次飞行数据验证中,低压转子转速、高压转子转速、压气机出口总压和低压涡轮出口总温的平均误差分别为0.52%、0.39%、0.53%和0.9%,满足项目精度要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信