Osteopathic treatment of the genital descensus and its accompanying symptoms in women. A comparative pi-lot study of osteopathy and electrostimulation /biofeedback for the pelvic floor.

D. Bogner, T. Berra
{"title":"Osteopathic treatment of the genital descensus and its accompanying symptoms in women. A comparative pi-lot study of osteopathy and electrostimulation /biofeedback for the pelvic floor.","authors":"D. Bogner, T. Berra","doi":"10.35740/ejor.2019.1.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: \nGenital descensus (POP = Pelvic Organ Prolapse) is a common condition among women (postpartum) in all age groups. The standard treatment is still surgical cor-rection followed by conservative therapies. An alternative method of treatment by osteopa-thy is still not widespread.\n\nAims: \nThere are treatment options analysed by osteopathy or PFMT (pelvic floor muscle training) with biofeedback/electrostimulation. The research question is: Is osteopathy in addition to the active practice by means of electrostimulation and biofeedback more suc-cessful than the practice using only the electrostimulations/biofeedback device?\nMethods: Clinical comparative study of 30 women. Throughout the observation period, all participants should get a biofeedback device. Half the women will also receive an osteo-pathic treatment. The primary target parameter of the score from the bladder SPSQ ques-tionnaire will be evaluated. As secondary parameters, a further 4 scores from the question-naire, a gynaecological diagnosis and the electromyogram of the biofeedback device are determined.\n\nResults: \nBoth methods show a significant improvement (experimental group: p < 0.001; con-trol group: p = 0.024) in the symptoms of genital prolapse of the bladder score. The differ-ence in improving the symptoms in the experimental group is significantly higher (p = 0.005) compared to the control group. Within the secondary parameters is the improvement of gynaecological diagnosis and an enormous increase in muscle strength is visible.\n\nConclusions: \nBoth methods represent a relevant alternative to surgical intervention. Osteo-pathic treatment is a very valuable add-on to standard conservative treatment.\nKeywords: genital descensus, pelvic organ prolapse, pelvic floor muscle training, biofeed-back, osteopathy","PeriodicalId":148885,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Osteopathic Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Osteopathic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35740/ejor.2019.1.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Genital descensus (POP = Pelvic Organ Prolapse) is a common condition among women (postpartum) in all age groups. The standard treatment is still surgical cor-rection followed by conservative therapies. An alternative method of treatment by osteopa-thy is still not widespread. Aims: There are treatment options analysed by osteopathy or PFMT (pelvic floor muscle training) with biofeedback/electrostimulation. The research question is: Is osteopathy in addition to the active practice by means of electrostimulation and biofeedback more suc-cessful than the practice using only the electrostimulations/biofeedback device? Methods: Clinical comparative study of 30 women. Throughout the observation period, all participants should get a biofeedback device. Half the women will also receive an osteo-pathic treatment. The primary target parameter of the score from the bladder SPSQ ques-tionnaire will be evaluated. As secondary parameters, a further 4 scores from the question-naire, a gynaecological diagnosis and the electromyogram of the biofeedback device are determined. Results: Both methods show a significant improvement (experimental group: p < 0.001; con-trol group: p = 0.024) in the symptoms of genital prolapse of the bladder score. The differ-ence in improving the symptoms in the experimental group is significantly higher (p = 0.005) compared to the control group. Within the secondary parameters is the improvement of gynaecological diagnosis and an enormous increase in muscle strength is visible. Conclusions: Both methods represent a relevant alternative to surgical intervention. Osteo-pathic treatment is a very valuable add-on to standard conservative treatment. Keywords: genital descensus, pelvic organ prolapse, pelvic floor muscle training, biofeed-back, osteopathy
女性生殖器下垂及其伴随症状的整骨疗法。骨疗和电刺激/生物反馈治疗盆底的对照试验研究。
背景:生殖器官下降(POP =盆腔器官脱垂)是所有年龄组妇女(产后)的常见疾病。标准的治疗方法仍然是手术矫正后再进行保守治疗。另一种治疗骨瘤病的方法仍然不普遍。目的:分析了骨病或PFMT(骨盆底肌肉训练)结合生物反馈/电刺激的治疗方案。研究的问题是:通过电刺激和生物反馈的积极实践之外的整骨疗法是否比仅使用电刺激/生物反馈装置的实践更成功?方法:对30例妇女进行临床比较研究。在整个观察期间,所有参与者都应该得到一个生物反馈装置。一半的女性还将接受整骨疗法。将评估膀胱SPSQ问卷得分的主要目标参数。作为次要参数,从问卷、妇科诊断和生物反馈装置的肌电图中确定另外4个分数。结果:两种方法均有显著改善(实验组:p < 0.001;对照组:p = 0.024)在膀胱外阴脱垂症状评分。与对照组相比,实验组在改善症状方面的差异显著增高(p = 0.005)。次要参数是妇科诊断的改善,肌肉力量的巨大增加是可见的。结论:这两种方法都是手术干预的相关替代方法。骨疗治疗是标准保守治疗的一个非常有价值的补充。关键词:生殖器下垂,盆腔器官脱垂,盆底肌肉训练,生物反馈,整骨术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信