Social Categories, Coordination, and Inequity

Cailin O’Connor
{"title":"Social Categories, Coordination, and Inequity","authors":"Cailin O’Connor","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198789970.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter shows why social categories provide solutions to certain coordination problems. It begins with a description of what social categories are and how they function in human groups. The chapter moves on to describe what social categories look like in game theoretic models. As becomes clear, a group with categories will often be able to achieve a level of efficiency unavailable to a group without them. There is a catch, though. The efficiency gained by adding social categories to a group often comes at the expense of egalitarianism. Groups that use social categories to solve coordination problems often display inequity in that joint action with unequal roles leads to unequal benefits for those involved.","PeriodicalId":135000,"journal":{"name":"The Origins of Unfairness","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Origins of Unfairness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198789970.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter shows why social categories provide solutions to certain coordination problems. It begins with a description of what social categories are and how they function in human groups. The chapter moves on to describe what social categories look like in game theoretic models. As becomes clear, a group with categories will often be able to achieve a level of efficiency unavailable to a group without them. There is a catch, though. The efficiency gained by adding social categories to a group often comes at the expense of egalitarianism. Groups that use social categories to solve coordination problems often display inequity in that joint action with unequal roles leads to unequal benefits for those involved.
社会分类、协调与不平等
这一章说明为什么社会范畴为某些协调问题提供了解决方案。它首先描述了什么是社会类别,以及它们如何在人类群体中发挥作用。本章继续描述社会类别在博弈论模型中的样子。很明显,一个有类别的团队通常能够达到一个没有类别的团队无法达到的效率水平。不过,这里有一个陷阱。为群体增加社会类别所获得的效率往往是以牺牲平均主义为代价的。利用社会类别来解决协调问题的群体往往表现出不平等,因为角色不平等的联合行动导致参与者的利益不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信