ECONOMIC GROWTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN OECD COUNTRIES: A TWENTY-YEAR STUDY OF DATA 2000–2019

N. Metzger, Vijay Shenai
{"title":"ECONOMIC GROWTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN OECD COUNTRIES: A TWENTY-YEAR STUDY OF DATA 2000–2019","authors":"N. Metzger, Vijay Shenai","doi":"10.35774/jee2021.04.585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the current research is to determine the factors and processes which influence economic growth and human development in relatively free societies and thereby provide a framework for policy formulation. Countries within the OECD grouping are committed to democratically elected government and market economies and fall into this category. The OECD group comprises 37 countries, including Colombia, and in 2019 accounted for 63% of real global GDP. This research focuses on the data of the thirty-seven countries over the twenty-year period of 2000-2019. Economic data is drawn from the World Bank and the IMF websites; whilst data on development indicators and income inequality is drawn from the UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) and WID (World Inequality database) websites. Analysis of the data in these countries provides insights into the factors and processes which influence economic growth and human development in economies with a democratic political regime. The estimated equation shows that economic growth in OECD countries was significantly higher when incoming investment as a proportion of the size of the economy and openness of the economy were higher, inflation, exchange rate changes and oil prices were lower. Smaller economies in the OECD also had higher economic growth. As the aim of a government is to increase not only the income but also the standard of living of its citizens, it is necessary also to assess the relationship between economic growth and the quality of life and wellbeing of its citizens. Five-year average cross-sectional regressions also show that economic growth in OECD countries is higher in the countries with lower HDI. This report further finds that economic growth has a bi-directional causality with changes in the human development index, and changes in life expectancy and a unidirectional causality with changes in the expected years of schooling (implying higher delivery of education) and changes in the standard of living. Another finding is that income inequality increases with economic growth; both in terms of the share of income of the top 10% and share of the lower 50%. Clearly investment in public goods, and social policies for education, skills training, healthcare and redistribution of wealth need more attention.","PeriodicalId":232319,"journal":{"name":"Issue Vol 20, No 4","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue Vol 20, No 4","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2021.04.585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the current research is to determine the factors and processes which influence economic growth and human development in relatively free societies and thereby provide a framework for policy formulation. Countries within the OECD grouping are committed to democratically elected government and market economies and fall into this category. The OECD group comprises 37 countries, including Colombia, and in 2019 accounted for 63% of real global GDP. This research focuses on the data of the thirty-seven countries over the twenty-year period of 2000-2019. Economic data is drawn from the World Bank and the IMF websites; whilst data on development indicators and income inequality is drawn from the UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) and WID (World Inequality database) websites. Analysis of the data in these countries provides insights into the factors and processes which influence economic growth and human development in economies with a democratic political regime. The estimated equation shows that economic growth in OECD countries was significantly higher when incoming investment as a proportion of the size of the economy and openness of the economy were higher, inflation, exchange rate changes and oil prices were lower. Smaller economies in the OECD also had higher economic growth. As the aim of a government is to increase not only the income but also the standard of living of its citizens, it is necessary also to assess the relationship between economic growth and the quality of life and wellbeing of its citizens. Five-year average cross-sectional regressions also show that economic growth in OECD countries is higher in the countries with lower HDI. This report further finds that economic growth has a bi-directional causality with changes in the human development index, and changes in life expectancy and a unidirectional causality with changes in the expected years of schooling (implying higher delivery of education) and changes in the standard of living. Another finding is that income inequality increases with economic growth; both in terms of the share of income of the top 10% and share of the lower 50%. Clearly investment in public goods, and social policies for education, skills training, healthcare and redistribution of wealth need more attention.
经合组织国家的经济增长和人类发展:2000-2019年数据的20年研究
目前研究的目的是确定在相对自由的社会中影响经济增长和人的发展的因素和过程,从而为制定政策提供一个框架。经合发组织内的国家致力于民主选举的政府和市场经济,属于这一类。经合组织由包括哥伦比亚在内的37个国家组成,2019年占全球实际GDP的63%。本研究的重点是37个国家2000-2019年20年期间的数据。经济数据来自世界银行和国际货币基金组织的网站;而关于发展指标和收入不平等的数据来自联合国开发计划署和世界不平等数据库网站。对这些国家的数据进行分析,可以深入了解在实行民主政治制度的经济体中影响经济增长和人的发展的因素和过程。估计的等式表明,经合组织国家的经济增长明显较高,当传入投资占经济规模和经济开放度的比例较高,通货膨胀,汇率变化和石油价格较低。经合组织中较小的经济体也有较高的经济增长率。由于政府的目标不仅是增加收入,而且是提高公民的生活水平,因此也有必要评估经济增长与公民的生活质量和福祉之间的关系。五年平均横截面回归也表明,经合组织国家的经济增长在人类发展指数较低的国家较高。本报告进一步发现,经济增长与人类发展指数的变化和预期寿命的变化之间存在双向因果关系,与预期受教育年限(意味着更高的教育交付)和生活水平变化之间存在单向因果关系。另一个发现是,收入不平等随着经济增长而加剧;包括收入最高的10%和收入最低的50%。显然,对公共产品的投资,以及针对教育、技能培训、医疗和财富再分配的社会政策,需要得到更多关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信