Leaving Buddhism

Monica Lindberg Falk
{"title":"Leaving Buddhism","authors":"Monica Lindberg Falk","doi":"10.1163/9789004331471_004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leaving Buddhism is a theme seldom addressed in Buddhist studies. Buddhism is generally perceived as a tolerant religion and followers are encouraged to scrutinise the Buddhist teachings and are free to leave the Buddhist faith. Buddhism does not sanction violence against apostates, there is no formal religious pretext for apostasy and Buddhism has not developed a concept of apostasy. However, for people who do apostasies from Buddhism, the worst consequences they suffer tend to be negative reactions from the family, including the risk of being ignored and shut out from family and community activities. The Buddha’s (c. 480 bce–c. 400 bce)1 attitude to apostasy is represented by an account of a meeting with one of the Buddha’s attendants Sunakkhatta. He was a disciple of the Buddha, but after a while he became dissatisfied with the Buddha’s practice and decided to renounce the teacher and his teaching. Sunakkhatta came to the Buddha and said: “Lord, I am leaving you, I am no longer living by your teachings.” The Buddha responded to this declaration by asking Sunakkhatta following questions: “Did I ever say to you; come, live by my teachings?” Sunakkhatta: “No Lord.” The Buddha: “Then did you ever say to me that you wished to live by my teachings?” Sunakkhatta: “No Lord.” The Buddha: “That being the case, who are you and what are you giving up, you foolish man?” (Digha Nikaya, iii 2–3). Sunakkhatta’s defection occurred when the Buddha was eighty years old and that was his last year in life (Batchelor 2015: 172). Neither in this case nor others did the Buddha suggest that apostates should be punished. The Buddhist traditions are so wide, diverse and multiplex that it often makes sense to refer to Buddhism in the plural form (see Strong 2015). Buddhism(s) is broadly divided into Theravada, Mahayana and Vajrayana traditions and these traditions are historically evolved and culturally embodied. Because of the great diversity within the Buddhist traditions, this chapter on","PeriodicalId":364665,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Leaving Religion","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Leaving Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004331471_004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leaving Buddhism is a theme seldom addressed in Buddhist studies. Buddhism is generally perceived as a tolerant religion and followers are encouraged to scrutinise the Buddhist teachings and are free to leave the Buddhist faith. Buddhism does not sanction violence against apostates, there is no formal religious pretext for apostasy and Buddhism has not developed a concept of apostasy. However, for people who do apostasies from Buddhism, the worst consequences they suffer tend to be negative reactions from the family, including the risk of being ignored and shut out from family and community activities. The Buddha’s (c. 480 bce–c. 400 bce)1 attitude to apostasy is represented by an account of a meeting with one of the Buddha’s attendants Sunakkhatta. He was a disciple of the Buddha, but after a while he became dissatisfied with the Buddha’s practice and decided to renounce the teacher and his teaching. Sunakkhatta came to the Buddha and said: “Lord, I am leaving you, I am no longer living by your teachings.” The Buddha responded to this declaration by asking Sunakkhatta following questions: “Did I ever say to you; come, live by my teachings?” Sunakkhatta: “No Lord.” The Buddha: “Then did you ever say to me that you wished to live by my teachings?” Sunakkhatta: “No Lord.” The Buddha: “That being the case, who are you and what are you giving up, you foolish man?” (Digha Nikaya, iii 2–3). Sunakkhatta’s defection occurred when the Buddha was eighty years old and that was his last year in life (Batchelor 2015: 172). Neither in this case nor others did the Buddha suggest that apostates should be punished. The Buddhist traditions are so wide, diverse and multiplex that it often makes sense to refer to Buddhism in the plural form (see Strong 2015). Buddhism(s) is broadly divided into Theravada, Mahayana and Vajrayana traditions and these traditions are historically evolved and culturally embodied. Because of the great diversity within the Buddhist traditions, this chapter on
离开佛教
离开佛教是佛学研究中很少涉及的主题。佛教通常被认为是一种宽容的宗教,鼓励追随者仔细研究佛教教义,并自由离开佛教信仰。佛教不允许对叛教者使用暴力,也没有正式的宗教借口来解释叛教,佛教也没有形成叛教的概念。然而,对于那些背信弃义的人来说,他们遭受的最严重的后果往往是来自家庭的负面反应,包括被忽视和被家庭和社区活动拒之门外的风险。佛陀的(公元前480年-公元前480年)。(公元前400年)他对叛教的态度体现在他与佛陀的一个随从苏那喀达的会面中。他是佛陀的弟子,但过了一段时间后,他对佛陀的修行感到不满,决定放弃这位老师和他的教导。如来来到佛陀面前说:“主啊,我要离开你了,我不再按照你的教导生活了。”佛陀对这句话的回答是:“我是否曾经对你说过;来吧,按照我的教诲生活吧?”苏那喀达:“不,主。”佛陀:“那么你曾经对我说过,你希望按照我的教导生活吗?”苏那喀达:“不,主。”佛陀:“既然如此,你是谁,你放弃了什么,你这个愚蠢的人?”(diga Nikaya, iii . 2-3)。佛陀八十岁时,也就是佛陀生命的最后一年(Batchelor 2015: 172)。无论是在这种情况下,还是在其他情况下,佛陀都没有建议叛教者应该受到惩罚。佛教传统是如此广泛、多样和多元,以至于用复数形式来指代佛教通常是有意义的(见Strong 2015)。佛教大致分为小乘、大乘和金刚乘,这些传统都是历史演变和文化体现的。由于佛教传统内部的巨大差异,本章将讨论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信