The Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Carbamazepine in Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

R. Millán-Guerrero, R. Isais-Millán, G. Castillo-Varela, Gabriel Ceja-Espíritu, M. A. Higareda-Almaraz
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Carbamazepine in Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"R. Millán-Guerrero, R. Isais-Millán, G. Castillo-Varela, Gabriel Ceja-Espíritu, M. A. Higareda-Almaraz","doi":"10.17140/ctpoj-2-104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To determine if the treatment of refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN) with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) could lead to improved pain control. Materials and Methods We enrolled 20 patients with refractory TN in a double blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients received either TENS for group 1 (n=10) or carbamazepine (CBZ) for group 2 (n=10). The visual analog pain scale (VAS) and the barrow neurological institute (BNI) pain scale, the number and duration of pain episodes and daily analgesic intake were analyzed for each group at 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years. Results The TENS group achieved better pain control than the CBZ group (p<0.05). Pain-free patients accounted for 60% in the TENS group and 50% in the CBZ group 1 month after initiating treatment, 100% and 77.77% at 3 months, 100% and 62.5% at 1 year, 100% and 50% at 3 years, respectively. The TENS group remained pain free for 3 years. At the 5-year mark, all members of the TENS group and the CBZ group presented pain recurrence. Conclusion TENS group scored significantly lower in pain scales compared with the CBZ group. TENS group was pain free for a longer period of time compared with the CBZ group. Significant differences between both groups favored TENS therapy, however the small sample size remains an important limitation of this study.","PeriodicalId":259842,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Trials and Practice – Open Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Trials and Practice – Open Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17140/ctpoj-2-104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives To determine if the treatment of refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN) with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) could lead to improved pain control. Materials and Methods We enrolled 20 patients with refractory TN in a double blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients received either TENS for group 1 (n=10) or carbamazepine (CBZ) for group 2 (n=10). The visual analog pain scale (VAS) and the barrow neurological institute (BNI) pain scale, the number and duration of pain episodes and daily analgesic intake were analyzed for each group at 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years. Results The TENS group achieved better pain control than the CBZ group (p<0.05). Pain-free patients accounted for 60% in the TENS group and 50% in the CBZ group 1 month after initiating treatment, 100% and 77.77% at 3 months, 100% and 62.5% at 1 year, 100% and 50% at 3 years, respectively. The TENS group remained pain free for 3 years. At the 5-year mark, all members of the TENS group and the CBZ group presented pain recurrence. Conclusion TENS group scored significantly lower in pain scales compared with the CBZ group. TENS group was pain free for a longer period of time compared with the CBZ group. Significant differences between both groups favored TENS therapy, however the small sample size remains an important limitation of this study.
经皮神经电刺激与卡马西平治疗三叉神经痛的疗效:一项随机对照试验
目的探讨经皮神经电刺激(TENS)治疗难治性三叉神经痛(TN)是否能改善疼痛控制。材料和方法我们招募了20例难治性TN患者进行双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的临床试验。1组患者接受TENS治疗(n=10), 2组患者接受卡马西平治疗(n=10)。分析各组患者1个月、2个月、3个月、1年、3年、5年的视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)和巴罗神经研究所(BNI)疼痛量表、疼痛发作次数、持续时间和每日止痛药摄入量。结果TENS组疼痛控制效果优于CBZ组(p<0.05)。开始治疗后1个月,TENS组无痛患者占60%,CBZ组无痛患者占50%,3个月无痛患者占100%和77.77%,1年无痛患者占100%和62.5%,3年无痛患者占100%和50%。TENS组连续3年无疼痛。5年时,TENS组和CBZ组均出现疼痛复发。结论TENS组疼痛量表评分明显低于CBZ组。与CBZ组相比,TENS组无疼痛时间更长。两组间的显著差异倾向于TENS治疗,然而小样本量仍然是本研究的重要局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信