Federalism: Prerequisite for Effective Criminal Justice Administration in the States

Hilary Okoeguale
{"title":"Federalism: Prerequisite for Effective Criminal Justice Administration in the States","authors":"Hilary Okoeguale","doi":"10.53982/alj.2019.0701.02-j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Federal system being practiced in Nigeria has been widely criticized and referred to as asymmetrical in favour of the Federal Government. In the Context of the criminal justice system (CJS), twoprincipalagencies are in the Exclusive Legislative list, that is to say, the Nigeria Police Force and the Nigerian Correctional Service. This situation leaves the States short of the requisite resources for effective criminal justice administration. This paper examines the federal structure as designed by the extant Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) (CFRN) with a view to bringing to the fore, the extent to which State Governments in Nigeria can maintain a coherent and smooth criminal justice administration. The paper also interrogates the capacity of State Governmentsto fight crime given the resources at their disposal. In doing so, it examines the tenets of a federal system of government and the extent of compliance in Nigeria. Consequently, it was found that theCFRN, robs State Governments in Nigeria of the requisite authority to maintain an independent, autonomousand effective criminal justice system. In other words, State Governments in Nigeria could make laws which a federal Police Force may refuseto carry out. This has negative implications for the state administration of justice, especially in the face of the upsurge in crime rate in Nigeria. Thepaper concludes that a State would be inherently weak if it were incapacitated or unable to enforce its own laws and as such recommends that the CFRN be reviewed in order to allow for a State Police Force and State Correctional Service.","PeriodicalId":123596,"journal":{"name":"ABUAD Law Journal","volume":"194 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABUAD Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53982/alj.2019.0701.02-j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Federal system being practiced in Nigeria has been widely criticized and referred to as asymmetrical in favour of the Federal Government. In the Context of the criminal justice system (CJS), twoprincipalagencies are in the Exclusive Legislative list, that is to say, the Nigeria Police Force and the Nigerian Correctional Service. This situation leaves the States short of the requisite resources for effective criminal justice administration. This paper examines the federal structure as designed by the extant Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) (CFRN) with a view to bringing to the fore, the extent to which State Governments in Nigeria can maintain a coherent and smooth criminal justice administration. The paper also interrogates the capacity of State Governmentsto fight crime given the resources at their disposal. In doing so, it examines the tenets of a federal system of government and the extent of compliance in Nigeria. Consequently, it was found that theCFRN, robs State Governments in Nigeria of the requisite authority to maintain an independent, autonomousand effective criminal justice system. In other words, State Governments in Nigeria could make laws which a federal Police Force may refuseto carry out. This has negative implications for the state administration of justice, especially in the face of the upsurge in crime rate in Nigeria. Thepaper concludes that a State would be inherently weak if it were incapacitated or unable to enforce its own laws and as such recommends that the CFRN be reviewed in order to allow for a State Police Force and State Correctional Service.
联邦制:各州有效刑事司法管理的先决条件
尼日利亚实行的联邦制受到广泛批评,并被认为是有利于联邦政府的不对称制度。在刑事司法系统方面,专属立法机构名单上有两个主要机构,即尼日利亚警察部队和尼日利亚惩教署。这种情况使各国缺乏有效执行刑事司法的必要资源。本文考察了现行的1999年尼日利亚联邦共和国宪法(经修订)(CFRN)所设计的联邦结构,以期突出尼日利亚各州政府能够在多大程度上保持连贯和顺利的刑事司法管理。该文件还询问了各国政府在拥有资源的情况下打击犯罪的能力。在此过程中,它审查了尼日利亚联邦政府制度的原则和遵守这些原则的程度。因此,委员会认为,该委员会剥夺了尼日利亚各州政府维持独立、自主和有效的刑事司法制度所必需的权力。换句话说,尼日利亚各州政府可以制定联邦警察部队可能拒绝执行的法律。这对国家司法行政产生了负面影响,特别是在尼日利亚犯罪率上升的情况下。该文件的结论是,如果一个州没有能力或无法执行其自己的法律,那么它就会天生软弱,因此建议对《联邦法律与资源保护法》进行审查,以便允许建立州警察部队和州惩教服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信