Evaluating personality traits of captive maned wolves, Chrysocyon brachyurus (Illiger, 1815) (Mammalia: Canidae), for conservation purposes

V. S. Silva, C. Azevedo
{"title":"Evaluating personality traits of captive maned wolves, Chrysocyon brachyurus (Illiger, 1815) (Mammalia: Canidae), for conservation purposes","authors":"V. S. Silva, C. Azevedo","doi":"10.35699/2675-5327.2013.23838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of animal personality has important implications in conservation programs. When reintroduction is used for the preservation of a species, the survival ratio of reintroduced animals needs to be high. The determination of animal personality helps choosing the right animals, therefore increasing their survival chances and also increasing the reintroduction success. Three captive, male maned wolves were chosen for personality evaluation. Two personality tests were carried out and compared: The boldness score test estimated the level of boldness from a series of behaviors divided into bold, shy and fear categories; and questionnaires showed how zookeepers perceived the personality of the same three animals, while they were working with them. According to the boldness score calculation, Maned Wolf Two (MW2) was the boldest, followed, in order, by MW1 and MW3. According to the questionnaires, MW1 was the boldest, followed by MW2 and by MW3. Reasons for these contradictory results and variables that should be considered in both tests for increasing their accuracy are discussed. Used together, these tests showed to be helpful tools for choosing among individuals to be released in the wild. \nKeywords: Maned wolf, personality tests, boldness score, questionnaires.","PeriodicalId":445542,"journal":{"name":"Lundiana: International Journal of Biodiversity","volume":"192 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lundiana: International Journal of Biodiversity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35699/2675-5327.2013.23838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The study of animal personality has important implications in conservation programs. When reintroduction is used for the preservation of a species, the survival ratio of reintroduced animals needs to be high. The determination of animal personality helps choosing the right animals, therefore increasing their survival chances and also increasing the reintroduction success. Three captive, male maned wolves were chosen for personality evaluation. Two personality tests were carried out and compared: The boldness score test estimated the level of boldness from a series of behaviors divided into bold, shy and fear categories; and questionnaires showed how zookeepers perceived the personality of the same three animals, while they were working with them. According to the boldness score calculation, Maned Wolf Two (MW2) was the boldest, followed, in order, by MW1 and MW3. According to the questionnaires, MW1 was the boldest, followed by MW2 and by MW3. Reasons for these contradictory results and variables that should be considered in both tests for increasing their accuracy are discussed. Used together, these tests showed to be helpful tools for choosing among individuals to be released in the wild. Keywords: Maned wolf, personality tests, boldness score, questionnaires.
圈养鬃狼Chrysocyon brachyurus (Illiger, 1815)(哺乳动物:犬科)的个性特征评估
动物个性的研究在保护项目中具有重要的意义。当为了保护一个物种而进行重新引入时,重新引入的动物的存活率需要很高。动物性格的决定有助于选择正确的动物,从而增加它们的生存机会,也增加了重新引入的成功。选择了三只圈养的雄性鬃狼进行个性评估。进行了两种性格测试并进行了比较:大胆得分测试从一系列分为大胆、害羞和恐惧类别的行为中估计大胆程度;调查问卷显示了动物园管理员在与这三只动物一起工作时对它们性格的看法。根据大胆得分计算,鬃狼2号(MW2)最大胆,其次是MW1和MW3。问卷显示,MW1是最大胆的,其次是MW2和MW3。讨论了产生这些矛盾结果的原因和两种测试中应考虑的变量,以提高其准确性。综合使用,这些测试显示是选择将个体释放到野外的有用工具。关键词:鬃狼;性格测试;大胆度;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信