Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Left Atrium Segmentation From LGE-MRI Data

D. Borra, Daniela Portas, A. Andalò, C. Fabbri, C. Corsi
{"title":"Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Left Atrium Segmentation From LGE-MRI Data","authors":"D. Borra, Daniela Portas, A. Andalò, C. Fabbri, C. Corsi","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2020.306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantification of viable left atrial (LA) tissue is a reliable information which should be used to support therapy selection in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) is employed for the non-invasive assessment of LA fibrotic tissue. Unfortunately, the analysis of LGE-MRI relies on manual tracing of LA boundaries. This task is time-consuming and prone to high inter-observer variability. Therefore, an automatic approach for LA wall detection would be very helpful. In this study, we compared the performance of different deep architectures - U-Net and attention U-Net (AttnU-Net) - and different loss functions - Dice loss (DL) and focal Tversky loss (FTL) to automatically detect LA boundaries from LGE-MRI data. In addition, AttnU-Net was trained without deep supervision (DS) and multi-scale inputs (MI), with DS and with DS+MI. No statistically significant differences were found training the networks with DL or FTL. U-Net was the best-performing algorithm overall, outperforming significantly AttnU-Net with a Dice Coefficient of 0.9015±0.0308 (mean ± standard deviation). However, no significant differences were found between U-Net and AttnU-Net DS/DS+MI. Based on these results, using a DL or FTL does not affect the performance and U-Net was the best-performing solution.","PeriodicalId":407282,"journal":{"name":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2020.306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Quantification of viable left atrial (LA) tissue is a reliable information which should be used to support therapy selection in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) is employed for the non-invasive assessment of LA fibrotic tissue. Unfortunately, the analysis of LGE-MRI relies on manual tracing of LA boundaries. This task is time-consuming and prone to high inter-observer variability. Therefore, an automatic approach for LA wall detection would be very helpful. In this study, we compared the performance of different deep architectures - U-Net and attention U-Net (AttnU-Net) - and different loss functions - Dice loss (DL) and focal Tversky loss (FTL) to automatically detect LA boundaries from LGE-MRI data. In addition, AttnU-Net was trained without deep supervision (DS) and multi-scale inputs (MI), with DS and with DS+MI. No statistically significant differences were found training the networks with DL or FTL. U-Net was the best-performing algorithm overall, outperforming significantly AttnU-Net with a Dice Coefficient of 0.9015±0.0308 (mean ± standard deviation). However, no significant differences were found between U-Net and AttnU-Net DS/DS+MI. Based on these results, using a DL or FTL does not affect the performance and U-Net was the best-performing solution.
基于LGE-MRI数据的左心房分割深度学习方法的性能比较
活左房组织的定量是一个可靠的信息,应用于支持心房颤动(AF)患者的治疗选择。晚期钆增强磁共振成像(LGE-MRI)用于LA纤维化组织的非侵入性评估。不幸的是,LGE-MRI的分析依赖于手动跟踪LA边界。这个任务很耗时,而且容易在观察者之间产生很大的差异。因此,一种自动检测LA壁的方法将非常有帮助。在这项研究中,我们比较了不同深度架构——U-Net和注意力U-Net (AttnU-Net)——和不同损失函数——Dice loss (DL)和focal Tversky loss (FTL)在从大磁共振成像数据中自动检测LA边界方面的性能。此外,在没有深度监督(DS)和多尺度输入(MI)的情况下,使用DS和DS+MI对AttnU-Net进行训练。用DL或FTL训练网络没有统计学上的显著差异。U-Net是整体表现最好的算法,其Dice系数为0.9015±0.0308(平均值±标准差),显著优于AttnU-Net。而U-Net和AttnU-Net DS/DS+MI之间无显著差异。基于这些结果,使用DL或FTL不会影响性能,U-Net是性能最好的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信