Subjectivity and Embodied Limits: Deborah Creamer's Disability and Christian Theology

Michael Mawson
{"title":"Subjectivity and Embodied Limits: Deborah Creamer's Disability and Christian Theology","authors":"Michael Mawson","doi":"10.1080/15228967.2013.840962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the tensions between our subjectivity and our status as embodied and limited beings, specifically in relation to Deborah Creamer's Disability and Christian Theology: Embodied Limits and Constructive Possibilities (2009). Moreover, this article aims to supplement and expand on Creamer's “model of limits” by arguing for a stronger attentiveness to the radically disruptive potential of our embodied limits. It also claims that such an attentiveness helps us to recognize two points at which Creamer overextends herself: (1) the claim that we are able to determine for ourselves what our individual limits are, and (2) the claim that we able to draw on our limits to creatively construct an image of God as similarly limited.","PeriodicalId":218195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion, Disability & Health","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion, Disability & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228967.2013.840962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This article explores the tensions between our subjectivity and our status as embodied and limited beings, specifically in relation to Deborah Creamer's Disability and Christian Theology: Embodied Limits and Constructive Possibilities (2009). Moreover, this article aims to supplement and expand on Creamer's “model of limits” by arguing for a stronger attentiveness to the radically disruptive potential of our embodied limits. It also claims that such an attentiveness helps us to recognize two points at which Creamer overextends herself: (1) the claim that we are able to determine for ourselves what our individual limits are, and (2) the claim that we able to draw on our limits to creatively construct an image of God as similarly limited.
主体性与具体化限制:狄波拉·克莱默的残疾与基督教神学
本文探讨了我们的主体性和我们作为具身和有限存在的地位之间的紧张关系,特别是与德博拉·克莱默的《残疾和基督教神学:具身限制和建设性可能性》(2009)有关。此外,本文旨在补充和扩展Creamer的“极限模型”,主张对我们具体化的极限的根本破坏性潜力给予更大的关注。它还声称,这种关注有助于我们认识到克里默过分夸大的两点:(1)声称我们能够为自己决定我们的个人极限是什么,(2)声称我们能够利用我们的极限创造性地构建一个同样有限的上帝形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信