Enhancing V ANET's Secure Routing with the Trust Metric

Afef Slama, Ilhem Lengliz
{"title":"Enhancing V ANET's Secure Routing with the Trust Metric","authors":"Afef Slama, Ilhem Lengliz","doi":"10.1109/ISNCC.2019.8909128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Secure routing is unceasing thought-provoking topic in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) in view of the essential characteristics of these networks, notably strong mobility of the nodes, highly dynamic and specific topology, significant loss rate and very short duration of communications. Indeed, every secure routing protocol ought to adjust its operation in order to fulfill V ANETs requirements and to provide a better secure level. Integrating Route Life Time policy (RLT) to AODV and DSR routing protocols is one of these adjustments. This policy aims to enhance the overall route lifetime. Trust Cryptographic Secure Routing (TCSR) protocol is another proposal for safe routing based on the choice of the most reliable node during the routing process. In this paper, we propose a comparative study of AODV-RLT, DSR-RLT and TCSR routing protocols to assess their performances. The simulation results show that TCSR protocol outperforms AODV-RL T and DSR-RLT in terms of verification delay and average throughput.","PeriodicalId":187178,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISNCC.2019.8909128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Secure routing is unceasing thought-provoking topic in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) in view of the essential characteristics of these networks, notably strong mobility of the nodes, highly dynamic and specific topology, significant loss rate and very short duration of communications. Indeed, every secure routing protocol ought to adjust its operation in order to fulfill V ANETs requirements and to provide a better secure level. Integrating Route Life Time policy (RLT) to AODV and DSR routing protocols is one of these adjustments. This policy aims to enhance the overall route lifetime. Trust Cryptographic Secure Routing (TCSR) protocol is another proposal for safe routing based on the choice of the most reliable node during the routing process. In this paper, we propose a comparative study of AODV-RLT, DSR-RLT and TCSR routing protocols to assess their performances. The simulation results show that TCSR protocol outperforms AODV-RL T and DSR-RLT in terms of verification delay and average throughput.
利用信任度量增强vanet的安全路由
鉴于车辆自组织网络(Vehicular Ad Hoc network, VANETs)具有节点移动性强、拓扑结构高度动态性和专用性强、丢失率高、通信持续时间短等本质特征,安全路由问题一直是VANETs研究的热点问题。实际上,每个安全路由协议都应该调整其操作,以满足V - ANETs的要求并提供更好的安全级别。将RLT (Route Life Time policy)集成到AODV和DSR路由协议中就是这些调整之一。该策略旨在提高路由的整体生存时间。可信加密安全路由(TCSR)协议是另一种基于在路由过程中选择最可靠节点的安全路由方案。在本文中,我们提出比较研究AODV-RLT, DSR-RLT和TCSR路由协议,以评估他们的性能。仿真结果表明,TCSR协议在验证延迟和平均吞吐量方面优于AODV-RL T和DSR-RLT协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信