The Interplay of Aesthetics, Usability and Credibility in Mobile Websites and the Moderation by Culture

Kiemute Oyibo, Julita Vassileva
{"title":"The Interplay of Aesthetics, Usability and Credibility in Mobile Websites and the Moderation by Culture","authors":"Kiemute Oyibo, Julita Vassileva","doi":"10.1145/3033701.3033711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationships between aesthetics, usability and credibility have been widely investigated in human-computer interaction (HCI). However, in the mobile domain, limited empirical evidence exists showing the interplay among these three constructs and the role culture plays. To address this, we carried out a survey on four systematically designed mobile websites among 233 subjects from Canada and Nigeria, which belong to low- and high-context cultures respectively. Using path modeling, we investigated the relationships among the perceptions of these three HCI constructs and the possible differences that exist between the two cultures. Our results show: 1) it is the perception of aesthetics that predominantly drives the judgment of mobile web credibility at the global and subgroup levels, with the effect size being greater for the Canadian group than for the Nigerian group; 2) the direct effect of aesthetics on usability is moderated by culture, with the magnitude being stronger for the Nigerian group than for the Canadian group; and 3) our models explain 29-83% of the variance of credibility.","PeriodicalId":345266,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3033701.3033711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

The relationships between aesthetics, usability and credibility have been widely investigated in human-computer interaction (HCI). However, in the mobile domain, limited empirical evidence exists showing the interplay among these three constructs and the role culture plays. To address this, we carried out a survey on four systematically designed mobile websites among 233 subjects from Canada and Nigeria, which belong to low- and high-context cultures respectively. Using path modeling, we investigated the relationships among the perceptions of these three HCI constructs and the possible differences that exist between the two cultures. Our results show: 1) it is the perception of aesthetics that predominantly drives the judgment of mobile web credibility at the global and subgroup levels, with the effect size being greater for the Canadian group than for the Nigerian group; 2) the direct effect of aesthetics on usability is moderated by culture, with the magnitude being stronger for the Nigerian group than for the Canadian group; and 3) our models explain 29-83% of the variance of credibility.
移动网站中美学、可用性和可信度的相互作用与文化的调节
在人机交互(HCI)中,美学、可用性和可信度之间的关系得到了广泛的研究。然而,在移动领域,有限的经验证据表明这三种结构之间的相互作用以及文化所起的作用。为了解决这个问题,我们对来自加拿大和尼日利亚的四个系统设计的移动网站进行了调查,其中233人分别属于低语境文化和高语境文化。使用路径模型,我们研究了这三种HCI结构的感知之间的关系以及两种文化之间可能存在的差异。我们的研究结果表明:1)在全球和子群体层面上,审美感知主导着对移动网络可信度的判断,加拿大群体的效应量大于尼日利亚群体;2)美学对可用性的直接影响受到文化的调节,尼日利亚群体比加拿大群体的影响更大;3)我们的模型解释了29-83%的可信度方差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信