Unsteady Effects due to Rotor Purge Flow Variations in a Dual-Spool Turbine Setup

F. Merli, P. Sterzinger, M. Dellacasagrande, L. Wiesinger, A. Peters, F. Heitmeir, E. Göttlich
{"title":"Unsteady Effects due to Rotor Purge Flow Variations in a Dual-Spool Turbine Setup","authors":"F. Merli, P. Sterzinger, M. Dellacasagrande, L. Wiesinger, A. Peters, F. Heitmeir, E. Göttlich","doi":"10.1115/GT2020-15216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The paper discusses the impact of rotor purge flows on the unsteady flow field downstream of a two-stage, two-spool test turbine. The analyzed setup is representative of the second high-pressure turbine (HPT) and the first low-pressure turbine (LPT) stage in a modern turbofan aero-engine, with a turbine center frame (TCF) with non-turning struts in-between the two turbines. All measurements were carried out for an engine-representative test vehicle setup at the Transonic Test Turbine Facility at Graz University of Technology. The test rig features a secondary air system delivering five purge flows with independent temperature and mass flow control to the HPT and LPT cavities.\n This work extends the results shown in two recent publications analyzing the time-resolved flow through the same two-stage setup at fixed purge flow rates. The paper aims to provide additional input about the driving sources of unsteadiness in gas turbines for aeronautic applications, by isolating the HPT and LPT purge air contributions.\n The time-resolved flow field at the LPT exit was acquired with a Fast Response Aerodynamic Pressure Probe (FRAPP) for three different purge conditions (reference case, no HPT purge case, no LPT purge case), to separate and quantify the impact of HPT and LPT purge contributions on the main flow field. The so-called Rotor Synchronic Averaging (RSA) technique was used as phase-averaging approach, to account for the unsteadiness due to both rotors. Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) was then applied to isolate the most important structures and identify their origins. The comparison of the three data-sets shows a significant influence of the HPT purge on the entire flow field at the LPT exit, even though the HPT is located far upstream, while the LPT purge impact appears to mostly affect the end-wall region.","PeriodicalId":194198,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2E: Turbomachinery","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2E: Turbomachinery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2020-15216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper discusses the impact of rotor purge flows on the unsteady flow field downstream of a two-stage, two-spool test turbine. The analyzed setup is representative of the second high-pressure turbine (HPT) and the first low-pressure turbine (LPT) stage in a modern turbofan aero-engine, with a turbine center frame (TCF) with non-turning struts in-between the two turbines. All measurements were carried out for an engine-representative test vehicle setup at the Transonic Test Turbine Facility at Graz University of Technology. The test rig features a secondary air system delivering five purge flows with independent temperature and mass flow control to the HPT and LPT cavities. This work extends the results shown in two recent publications analyzing the time-resolved flow through the same two-stage setup at fixed purge flow rates. The paper aims to provide additional input about the driving sources of unsteadiness in gas turbines for aeronautic applications, by isolating the HPT and LPT purge air contributions. The time-resolved flow field at the LPT exit was acquired with a Fast Response Aerodynamic Pressure Probe (FRAPP) for three different purge conditions (reference case, no HPT purge case, no LPT purge case), to separate and quantify the impact of HPT and LPT purge contributions on the main flow field. The so-called Rotor Synchronic Averaging (RSA) technique was used as phase-averaging approach, to account for the unsteadiness due to both rotors. Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) was then applied to isolate the most important structures and identify their origins. The comparison of the three data-sets shows a significant influence of the HPT purge on the entire flow field at the LPT exit, even though the HPT is located far upstream, while the LPT purge impact appears to mostly affect the end-wall region.
双轴涡轮装置中转子吹扫流量变化的非定常效应
本文讨论了转子吹扫流动对两级双轴试验涡轮下游非定常流场的影响。所分析的装置代表了现代涡扇航空发动机的第二高压涡轮(HPT)和第一低压涡轮(LPT)阶段,两个涡轮之间有一个涡轮中心框架(TCF),中间有不转动支柱。所有的测量都是在格拉茨理工大学跨音速涡轮测试设施的发动机代表性测试车辆设置中进行的。该试验台配备了一个二次空气系统,可向HPT和LPT腔体提供五种净化气流,并具有独立的温度和质量流量控制。这项工作扩展了最近两份出版物中显示的结果,分析了在固定吹扫流量下通过相同的两级设置的时间分辨流。本文旨在通过隔离高压高压和低压高压吹扫空气的贡献,为航空应用的燃气轮机不稳定的驱动源提供额外的输入。采用快速响应气动压力探针(FRAPP)获取了三种不同吹扫工况(参考工况、无HPT吹扫工况、无LPT吹扫工况)下LPT出口的时间分辨流场,以分离和量化HPT和LPT吹扫对主流场的影响。所谓的转子同步平均(RSA)技术被用作相位平均方法,以解释由于两个转子的不稳定。然后应用正交分解(POD)分离出最重要的结构并确定其来源。三种数据集的对比表明,尽管高压泵位于上游,但高压泵吹扫对低压泵出口处的整个流场都有显著影响,而高压泵吹扫的影响似乎主要影响端壁区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信