Developing and Debating the Covenant of Works

H. Perkins
{"title":"Developing and Debating the Covenant of Works","authors":"H. Perkins","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197514184.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whereas Chapter 2 dealt primarily with the relationship between Ussher’s doctrine of the covenant of works and the broader Christian tradition, this chapter examines how he developed his view in relation to more proximate Reformed theologians and their discussions specifically about the covenant of works. This chapter analyzes how the theologians whom Ussher cited as having written works important to his own thinking developed the concept of the covenant of works. This emphasis on Ussher’s connection to his identified sources illustrates how he adopted and modified previous arguments about the covenant of works. It also gives insight into how theologians built their doctrines on differing assumptions from older traditions, depending on whether they tended to lean more Thomist or more Scotist.","PeriodicalId":429625,"journal":{"name":"Catholicity and the Covenant of Works","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catholicity and the Covenant of Works","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197514184.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whereas Chapter 2 dealt primarily with the relationship between Ussher’s doctrine of the covenant of works and the broader Christian tradition, this chapter examines how he developed his view in relation to more proximate Reformed theologians and their discussions specifically about the covenant of works. This chapter analyzes how the theologians whom Ussher cited as having written works important to his own thinking developed the concept of the covenant of works. This emphasis on Ussher’s connection to his identified sources illustrates how he adopted and modified previous arguments about the covenant of works. It also gives insight into how theologians built their doctrines on differing assumptions from older traditions, depending on whether they tended to lean more Thomist or more Scotist.
工作之约的发展与争论
第二章主要讨论的是厄舍关于行为之约的教义与更广泛的基督教传统之间的关系,而这一章研究的是厄舍如何将自己的观点与更接近的改革宗神学家以及他们对行为之约的具体讨论联系起来。这一章分析了亚瑟所引用的神学家是如何发展出行为之约的概念的,这些神学家的著作对他自己的思想很重要。强调厄舍与已确认的资料来源的联系,说明了他是如何采纳和修改之前关于工作之约的论点的。它还让我们深入了解神学家是如何在不同于旧传统的假设上建立他们的教义的,这取决于他们是倾向于更倾向于托马斯主义还是苏格兰主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信