Enabling Patentless Innovation

C. Asay
{"title":"Enabling Patentless Innovation","authors":"C. Asay","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2289326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Do patents promote innovation? Many in open innovation communities — or those that collaborate to create and make technology publicly available under permissive terms — have long argued that patents stifle rather than promote innovation. Indeed, it has become nearly conventional wisdom in open innovation circles that the patent system imposes undue burdens on open innovation communities in particular. This may be especially true because, for a variety of reasons, open innovation communities have traditionally failed to pursue patents on their technologies. Consequently, some argue that the best way for these communities to protect themselves is by bucking this trend and acquiring significant numbers of patents for defensive purposes. Some in open innovation communities have begun to follow this approach. What remains underexplored in this discussion, however, is the extent to which patents actually threaten open innovation communities. Previous assessments treat these communities monolithically in terms of patent risk, but open innovation communities by definition consist of a broad spectrum of participants with distinct risk profiles. This Article disaggregates open innovation communities and assesses the actual risks that patents may pose to different categories of participants in those communities. It argues that several factors diminish the actual patent risks in some cases, at least as they are generally presented. However, the Article also highlights certain previously unexamined patent risks that arise based on incompatibilities between the decentralized nature of open innovation and the centralized nature of patent rights. These risks suggest that using patents to combat patent risks may not be a viable long-term strategy for open innovation communities. Based on these conclusions, the Article then assesses other possibilities for better reconciling the patent system with the phenomenon of open innovation. In particular, it suggests as one such possibility a two-track patent system that would grant open innovators an independent invention defense to patent infringement in exchange for an agreement not to assert patents except defensively. The Article concludes by suggesting that such a system would not only benefit open innovation communities, but may also help address broader concerns with the patent system as well.","PeriodicalId":413086,"journal":{"name":"Penn State Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Penn State Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2289326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Do patents promote innovation? Many in open innovation communities — or those that collaborate to create and make technology publicly available under permissive terms — have long argued that patents stifle rather than promote innovation. Indeed, it has become nearly conventional wisdom in open innovation circles that the patent system imposes undue burdens on open innovation communities in particular. This may be especially true because, for a variety of reasons, open innovation communities have traditionally failed to pursue patents on their technologies. Consequently, some argue that the best way for these communities to protect themselves is by bucking this trend and acquiring significant numbers of patents for defensive purposes. Some in open innovation communities have begun to follow this approach. What remains underexplored in this discussion, however, is the extent to which patents actually threaten open innovation communities. Previous assessments treat these communities monolithically in terms of patent risk, but open innovation communities by definition consist of a broad spectrum of participants with distinct risk profiles. This Article disaggregates open innovation communities and assesses the actual risks that patents may pose to different categories of participants in those communities. It argues that several factors diminish the actual patent risks in some cases, at least as they are generally presented. However, the Article also highlights certain previously unexamined patent risks that arise based on incompatibilities between the decentralized nature of open innovation and the centralized nature of patent rights. These risks suggest that using patents to combat patent risks may not be a viable long-term strategy for open innovation communities. Based on these conclusions, the Article then assesses other possibilities for better reconciling the patent system with the phenomenon of open innovation. In particular, it suggests as one such possibility a two-track patent system that would grant open innovators an independent invention defense to patent infringement in exchange for an agreement not to assert patents except defensively. The Article concludes by suggesting that such a system would not only benefit open innovation communities, but may also help address broader concerns with the patent system as well.
实现无专利创新
专利能促进创新吗?许多开放创新社区的成员——或者那些在许可条款下合作创造和公开技术的社区——长期以来一直认为,专利扼杀而不是促进了创新。事实上,专利制度给开放式创新社区带来了不应有的负担,这几乎已经成为开放式创新圈的共识。由于各种原因,开放式创新社区传统上未能为其技术申请专利,这一点可能尤其正确。因此,一些人认为,这些社区保护自己的最佳方式是抵制这种趋势,为防御目的获得大量专利。一些开放式创新社区已经开始采用这种方法。然而,在这个讨论中,专利到底在多大程度上威胁了开放式创新社区,这一点还没有得到充分的探讨。以前的评估从专利风险的角度单一地对待这些社区,但是根据定义,开放创新社区由具有不同风险概况的广泛参与者组成。本文对开放式创新社区进行了分类,并评估了专利可能给这些社区中不同类别的参与者带来的实际风险。它认为,在某些情况下,有几个因素减少了实际的专利风险,至少在它们通常呈现的情况下是这样。然而,这篇文章还强调了某些以前未经审查的专利风险,这些风险是基于开放式创新的分散性质与专利权的集中性质之间的不兼容而产生的。这些风险表明,对于开放创新社区来说,利用专利来对抗专利风险可能不是一个可行的长期战略。基于这些结论,本文评估了更好地协调专利制度与开放式创新现象的其他可能性。特别是,它提出了这样一种可能性,即双轨专利制度,允许开放的创新者对专利侵权进行独立的发明辩护,以换取不主张专利的协议,除非是防御性的。这篇文章的结论是,这样的制度不仅有利于开放的创新社区,而且也可能有助于解决与专利制度有关的更广泛的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信