Methods for Evaluation of Human-in-the-Loop Inspection of a Space Station Mockup Using a Quadcopter

Hannah Weiss, Ansh Patel, Matthew Romano, Brandon Apodoca, Prince Kuevor, E. Atkins, L. Stirling
{"title":"Methods for Evaluation of Human-in-the-Loop Inspection of a Space Station Mockup Using a Quadcopter","authors":"Hannah Weiss, Ansh Patel, Matthew Romano, Brandon Apodoca, Prince Kuevor, E. Atkins, L. Stirling","doi":"10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Suited astronauts currently perform visual inspections for external spacecraft damage during extravehicular activity (EVA). Small, free-flying satellites can be used to perform these visual inspection tasks to reduce crew risk by keeping astronauts inside the vehicle. One approach gives the astronaut teleoperational control of the satellite, while another approach is engaging a control system that commands the satellite to fly along an inspection path. We assembled a mockup of a space station (featuring three modules of varying geometry) and used a quadcopter fitted with a GoPro Camera to emulate visual inspection of the mockup by the small satellite. A pilot participant performed the space station inspection task by utilizing the teleoperation mode of the quadcopter. The participant had access to a line-of-sight view of the quadcopter and space station mockup from a distance, and an egocentric view of the testing area (including the mockup) from the quadcopter's onboard camera. The inspection task required the participant to actively scan for, locate, and take pictures of surface anomalies on the space station mockup. Performance was evaluated by determining percentage of anomalies detected, time taken to complete the inspection, and gaze time percentages (physical quadcopter and space station versus camera display). Observations were recorded for the teleoperated flight mode and indicate a strong user preference for an egocentric quadcopter view to support anomaly detection and navigation. In the teleoperated flight mode, the participant had difficulty with accurately and consistently locating anomalies while also navigating and controlling the quadcopter. Global situation awareness abilities and anomaly detection performance were limited, suggesting further research is needed to support human-robot teaming for spacecraft inspection. This preliminary evaluation supports continued data collection with the developed test bed for human-robot interaction with additional levels of automation. Findings from the methods proposed can lead to design recommendations regarding the usage of teleoperated and autonomous flight modes as well as the impact of available viewpoints.","PeriodicalId":219988,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Suited astronauts currently perform visual inspections for external spacecraft damage during extravehicular activity (EVA). Small, free-flying satellites can be used to perform these visual inspection tasks to reduce crew risk by keeping astronauts inside the vehicle. One approach gives the astronaut teleoperational control of the satellite, while another approach is engaging a control system that commands the satellite to fly along an inspection path. We assembled a mockup of a space station (featuring three modules of varying geometry) and used a quadcopter fitted with a GoPro Camera to emulate visual inspection of the mockup by the small satellite. A pilot participant performed the space station inspection task by utilizing the teleoperation mode of the quadcopter. The participant had access to a line-of-sight view of the quadcopter and space station mockup from a distance, and an egocentric view of the testing area (including the mockup) from the quadcopter's onboard camera. The inspection task required the participant to actively scan for, locate, and take pictures of surface anomalies on the space station mockup. Performance was evaluated by determining percentage of anomalies detected, time taken to complete the inspection, and gaze time percentages (physical quadcopter and space station versus camera display). Observations were recorded for the teleoperated flight mode and indicate a strong user preference for an egocentric quadcopter view to support anomaly detection and navigation. In the teleoperated flight mode, the participant had difficulty with accurately and consistently locating anomalies while also navigating and controlling the quadcopter. Global situation awareness abilities and anomaly detection performance were limited, suggesting further research is needed to support human-robot teaming for spacecraft inspection. This preliminary evaluation supports continued data collection with the developed test bed for human-robot interaction with additional levels of automation. Findings from the methods proposed can lead to design recommendations regarding the usage of teleoperated and autonomous flight modes as well as the impact of available viewpoints.
利用四轴飞行器对空间站模型进行人在环检测的评估方法
宇航服的宇航员目前在舱外活动(EVA)期间进行外部航天器损坏的目视检查。小型、自由飞行的卫星可以用来执行这些目视检查任务,通过将宇航员留在飞行器内来降低机组人员的风险。一种方法是让宇航员远程控制卫星,而另一种方法是使用控制系统,命令卫星沿着检查路径飞行。我们组装了一个空间站的模型(具有三个不同几何形状的模块),并使用配备GoPro相机的四轴飞行器模拟小卫星对模型的视觉检查。一名飞行员参与者通过利用四轴飞行器的远程操作模式执行空间站检查任务。参与者可以从远处获得四轴飞行器和空间站模型的视线视图,并从四轴飞行器的机载相机获得测试区域(包括模型)的自我中心视图。检查任务要求参与者主动扫描、定位和拍摄空间站模型上的表面异常。通过确定检测到的异常百分比、完成检查所需的时间和注视时间百分比(物理四轴飞行器和空间站与相机显示)来评估性能。观察记录远程操作飞行模式,并表明强烈的用户偏好以自我为中心的四轴飞行器视图,以支持异常检测和导航。在远程操作飞行模式下,参与者难以准确和一致地定位异常,同时也导航和控制四轴飞行器。全局态势感知能力和异常检测性能有限,需要进一步研究以支持航天器检测的人机团队。这一初步评估支持使用已开发的测试平台继续收集数据,以进一步实现自动化水平的人机交互。从所提出的方法中得出的结论可以导致有关远程操作和自主飞行模式的使用以及可用视点的影响的设计建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信