The Precision of Ability Estimates and Item Pool Utilization Depending on Degrees of Correlations among Subsections and Item Selection Criteria in Computerized Adaptive Testing

Youmin Hong, Guemin Lee
{"title":"The Precision of Ability Estimates and Item Pool Utilization Depending on Degrees of Correlations among Subsections and Item Selection Criteria in Computerized Adaptive Testing","authors":"Youmin Hong, Guemin Lee","doi":"10.31158/jeev.2022.35.4.633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of degrees of correlations among subsections and item selection criteria on the precision of ability estimates and item pool utilization in computerized adaptive testing (CAT). Based on the results of this simulation study, the following conclusions can be made. First, the precision of ability estimates would be decreased when the correlations among subsections was relatively low. Second, when implementing an a-stratified item selection method (AST), the effects of degrees of correlations among subsections on the precision of ability estimates increased, compared to the maximum fisher information item selection method (MFI). Third, when the test length was relatively long, the effects of degrees of correlations among subsections on the precision of ability estimates decreased. Forth, MFI with content-balancing increased the precision of ability estimates, especially in the case of low correlations among subsections. The item pool utilization seemed not to be considerably affected by the correlations among subsections, implementing a-stratification item selection method and/or item exposure strategy, the item pool utilization increased.","PeriodicalId":207460,"journal":{"name":"Korean Society for Educational Evaluation","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Society for Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31158/jeev.2022.35.4.633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of degrees of correlations among subsections and item selection criteria on the precision of ability estimates and item pool utilization in computerized adaptive testing (CAT). Based on the results of this simulation study, the following conclusions can be made. First, the precision of ability estimates would be decreased when the correlations among subsections was relatively low. Second, when implementing an a-stratified item selection method (AST), the effects of degrees of correlations among subsections on the precision of ability estimates increased, compared to the maximum fisher information item selection method (MFI). Third, when the test length was relatively long, the effects of degrees of correlations among subsections on the precision of ability estimates decreased. Forth, MFI with content-balancing increased the precision of ability estimates, especially in the case of low correlations among subsections. The item pool utilization seemed not to be considerably affected by the correlations among subsections, implementing a-stratification item selection method and/or item exposure strategy, the item pool utilization increased.
计算机化自适应测试中能力估计精度和题库利用率依赖于子部分和题库选择标准的相关度
摘要本研究的目的是探讨在计算机化自适应测验(CAT)中,各小节和题项选择标准之间的相关程度对能力估计精度和题项池利用率的影响。根据本次仿真研究的结果,可以得出以下结论:首先,当各子集之间的相关性较低时,能力估计的精度会降低。其次,与最大fisher信息项目选择方法(MFI)相比,采用分层项目选择方法(AST)时,子部分之间的相关程度对能力估计精度的影响增加。第三,当测试长度相对较长时,子集之间的相关程度对能力估计精度的影响降低。第四,具有内容平衡的MFI提高了能力估计的精度,特别是在子部分之间相关性较低的情况下。项目池利用率似乎不受分组间相关性的显著影响,采用分层项目选择方法和/或项目暴露策略后,项目池利用率有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信