Fairness in Resource Distribution: Relationship between Children’s Moral Reasoning and Logical Reasoning

Derya Can, Veli Can
{"title":"Fairness in Resource Distribution: Relationship between Children’s Moral Reasoning and Logical Reasoning","authors":"Derya Can, Veli Can","doi":"10.2478/atd-2020-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: The aim of this study is to examine children’s moral reasoning and logical reasoning processes and the relationship between these two mechanisms. In the present study the focus is on the relationship between the factors such as fair sharing, equality, merit, ownership, opportunity in the resource allocation and logical reasoning among the children aged 5-7. Methods: In this study, which aims to examine how the logical thinking skills differ according to the children’s moral reasoning process, a survey design approach was used. Participants were 92 children aged 5 (female N=13, male N=14) and aged 6 (female N=17, male N=18), aged 7 (female N=17, male N=13). The data collected from the moral and logical reasoning tasks were analyzed in two steps. At the first step the answers of the participants were scored. At the second step their justifications were categorized. To test out hypotheses we used two general linear models to examine the age effects of Age (5-7 years) and Reasoning (equality, ownership, merit, opportunity) on children’s evaluations of the vignette characters’ actions. Age-related changes in children’s evaluation and their logical reasoning skills related to initial distribution and transfer status were analyzed by the variance analysis. Results: Based on the findings of the study it can be stated that the children in the age group of 6-7 evaluated negatively the reward distribution based on the outcomes due to their concerns about the inequality in the opportunities and the violation of the principle of equality. The findings of the study indicate that there is no significant difference in children’s logical thinking skills depending on their age. As a result of the study, it is found that although there is no direct relationship between the moral and logical reasoning processes of children, the children who can reject the AC type inference predominantly emphasize the principle of equality. Although there is no significant relationship between moral reasoning and logical reasoning processes, it can be said that children with higher levels of logical reasoning much more frequently emphasize the principle of equality in moral reasoning process. Discussion: Research indicates that children aged around 5 consider the reward distribution based on the outcomes fair. Older children, on the other hand, evaluate the inequalities in resource distribution as unfair. These findings support the results of the study suggesting that older children consider inequal source distribution both at the first case and at the transfer cases unfair. The children’s approval or disapproval of the transfer varies based on their reasoning processes. They support transfer if they emphasize the principle of equality, but they do not support it if their focus is on the principle of ownership. Older children are found to have a commitment to the principle of equality, and the difference between the 5-year age group and the 6-7-year age group is remarkable in this regard. Similar findings are reported in the previous studies, and it is generally stated that younger children are more selfish and that the tendency to distribute resources equally becomes dominant due to the increase in the age of children. Although there is no significant relationship between moral reasoning and logical reasoning processes, it can be said that children with higher levels of logical reasoning emphasize the principle of equality in moral reasoning process much more frequently. Conclusion: Cognitivists argue that cognition and particularly reasoning have significant roles in making moral decisions. It suggests that children whose logical thinking skills are higher than others understand the necessity of equality to ensure fairness. The basic information on logic should be taught and introduced to the children from an early age. In addition, children should be ensured to use these methods through connections with both daily life and other courses at schools. It is thought that having basic logic knowledge by children will affect positively their cognitive, affective and social development. In order to examine this effect, a logic program including simple logic rules and basic inference types should be developed and the effects of such programs on the cognitive, affective and social development of children should be examined.","PeriodicalId":113905,"journal":{"name":"Acta Educationis Generalis","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Educationis Generalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2020-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The aim of this study is to examine children’s moral reasoning and logical reasoning processes and the relationship between these two mechanisms. In the present study the focus is on the relationship between the factors such as fair sharing, equality, merit, ownership, opportunity in the resource allocation and logical reasoning among the children aged 5-7. Methods: In this study, which aims to examine how the logical thinking skills differ according to the children’s moral reasoning process, a survey design approach was used. Participants were 92 children aged 5 (female N=13, male N=14) and aged 6 (female N=17, male N=18), aged 7 (female N=17, male N=13). The data collected from the moral and logical reasoning tasks were analyzed in two steps. At the first step the answers of the participants were scored. At the second step their justifications were categorized. To test out hypotheses we used two general linear models to examine the age effects of Age (5-7 years) and Reasoning (equality, ownership, merit, opportunity) on children’s evaluations of the vignette characters’ actions. Age-related changes in children’s evaluation and their logical reasoning skills related to initial distribution and transfer status were analyzed by the variance analysis. Results: Based on the findings of the study it can be stated that the children in the age group of 6-7 evaluated negatively the reward distribution based on the outcomes due to their concerns about the inequality in the opportunities and the violation of the principle of equality. The findings of the study indicate that there is no significant difference in children’s logical thinking skills depending on their age. As a result of the study, it is found that although there is no direct relationship between the moral and logical reasoning processes of children, the children who can reject the AC type inference predominantly emphasize the principle of equality. Although there is no significant relationship between moral reasoning and logical reasoning processes, it can be said that children with higher levels of logical reasoning much more frequently emphasize the principle of equality in moral reasoning process. Discussion: Research indicates that children aged around 5 consider the reward distribution based on the outcomes fair. Older children, on the other hand, evaluate the inequalities in resource distribution as unfair. These findings support the results of the study suggesting that older children consider inequal source distribution both at the first case and at the transfer cases unfair. The children’s approval or disapproval of the transfer varies based on their reasoning processes. They support transfer if they emphasize the principle of equality, but they do not support it if their focus is on the principle of ownership. Older children are found to have a commitment to the principle of equality, and the difference between the 5-year age group and the 6-7-year age group is remarkable in this regard. Similar findings are reported in the previous studies, and it is generally stated that younger children are more selfish and that the tendency to distribute resources equally becomes dominant due to the increase in the age of children. Although there is no significant relationship between moral reasoning and logical reasoning processes, it can be said that children with higher levels of logical reasoning emphasize the principle of equality in moral reasoning process much more frequently. Conclusion: Cognitivists argue that cognition and particularly reasoning have significant roles in making moral decisions. It suggests that children whose logical thinking skills are higher than others understand the necessity of equality to ensure fairness. The basic information on logic should be taught and introduced to the children from an early age. In addition, children should be ensured to use these methods through connections with both daily life and other courses at schools. It is thought that having basic logic knowledge by children will affect positively their cognitive, affective and social development. In order to examine this effect, a logic program including simple logic rules and basic inference types should be developed and the effects of such programs on the cognitive, affective and social development of children should be examined.
资源分配的公平性:儿童道德推理与逻辑推理的关系
摘要:本研究的目的是研究儿童的道德推理和逻辑推理过程以及这两种机制之间的关系。本研究主要探讨5-7岁儿童资源分配中的公平分享、平等、优点、所有权、机会等因素与逻辑推理的关系。方法:本研究采用问卷调查设计法,考察儿童道德推理过程中逻辑思维能力的差异。参与者为92名儿童,年龄为5岁(女13名,男14名)、6岁(女17名,男18名)、7岁(女17名,男13名)。从道德和逻辑推理任务中收集的数据分两步进行分析。在第一步,参与者的答案被打分。在第二步,他们的理由被分类。为了检验假设,我们使用了两个一般线性模型来检验年龄(5-7岁)和推理(平等、所有权、优点、机会)对儿童对小插图人物行为的评价的年龄影响。采用方差分析分析儿童评价及其逻辑推理能力初始分布和迁移状态的年龄相关变化。结果:根据研究结果,6-7岁年龄组的儿童对基于结果的奖励分配的评价是消极的,因为他们担心机会不平等,违反了平等原则。研究结果表明,不同年龄的儿童在逻辑思维能力上没有显著差异。研究结果发现,虽然儿童的道德推理过程与逻辑推理过程之间没有直接关系,但能够拒绝AC型推理的儿童主要强调平等原则。虽然道德推理与逻辑推理过程之间没有显著的关系,但可以说,逻辑推理水平越高的儿童在道德推理过程中更频繁地强调平等原则。讨论:研究表明,5岁左右的孩子认为基于结果的奖励分配是公平的。另一方面,大一点的孩子则认为资源分配的不平等是不公平的。这些发现支持了研究的结果,即年龄较大的儿童认为在第一个案例和转移案例中不平等的资源分配是不公平的。孩子们对这种转移的赞成或不赞成取决于他们的推理过程。如果他们强调平等原则,他们支持转移,但如果他们关注所有权原则,他们不支持转移。年龄较大的儿童被发现对平等原则有承诺,5岁年龄组和6-7岁年龄组在这方面的差异是显著的。在之前的研究中也有类似的发现,普遍认为年龄越小的孩子越自私,随着年龄的增长,平均分配资源的倾向成为主导。虽然道德推理与逻辑推理过程之间没有显著的关系,但可以说,逻辑推理水平较高的儿童更频繁地强调道德推理过程中的平等原则。结论:认知主义者认为,认知,特别是推理在道德决策中起着重要作用。这表明,逻辑思维能力比其他人高的孩子理解平等的必要性,以确保公平。逻辑的基本知识应该从小就传授给孩子。此外,应确保儿童通过与日常生活和学校其他课程的联系来使用这些方法。具有基本的逻辑知识对儿童的认知、情感和社会发展具有积极的影响。为了检验这种效果,应该开发一个包含简单逻辑规则和基本推理类型的逻辑程序,并检查这些程序对儿童的认知、情感和社会发展的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信