Measuring Students’ Self-Regulatory Phases in LMS with Behavior and Real-Time Self Report

Fatemeh Salehian Kia, M. Hatala, R. Baker, Stephanie D. Teasley
{"title":"Measuring Students’ Self-Regulatory Phases in LMS with Behavior and Real-Time Self Report","authors":"Fatemeh Salehian Kia, M. Hatala, R. Baker, Stephanie D. Teasley","doi":"10.1145/3448139.3448164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has emphasized that self-regulated learning (SRL) is critically important for learning. However, students have different capabilities of regulating their learning processes and individual needs. To help students improve their SRL capabilities, we need to identify students’ current behaviors. Specifically, we applied instructional design to create visible and meaningful markers of student learning at different points in time in LMS logs. We adopted knowledge engineering to develop a framework of proximal indicators representing SRL phases and evaluated them in a quasi-experiment in two different learning activities. A comparison of two sources of collected students’ SRL data, self-reported and trace data, revealed a relatively high agreement between our classifications (weighted kappa, κ = .74 and κ = .68). However, our indicators did not always discriminate adjacent SRL phases, particularly for enactment and adapting phases, compared with students’ real-time self-reported behaviors. Our behavioral indicators also were comparably successful at classifying SRL phases for different self-regulatory engagement levels. This study demonstrated how the triangulation of various sources of students’ self-regulatory data could help to unravel the complex nature of metacognitive processes.","PeriodicalId":108600,"journal":{"name":"LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3448139.3448164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Research has emphasized that self-regulated learning (SRL) is critically important for learning. However, students have different capabilities of regulating their learning processes and individual needs. To help students improve their SRL capabilities, we need to identify students’ current behaviors. Specifically, we applied instructional design to create visible and meaningful markers of student learning at different points in time in LMS logs. We adopted knowledge engineering to develop a framework of proximal indicators representing SRL phases and evaluated them in a quasi-experiment in two different learning activities. A comparison of two sources of collected students’ SRL data, self-reported and trace data, revealed a relatively high agreement between our classifications (weighted kappa, κ = .74 and κ = .68). However, our indicators did not always discriminate adjacent SRL phases, particularly for enactment and adapting phases, compared with students’ real-time self-reported behaviors. Our behavioral indicators also were comparably successful at classifying SRL phases for different self-regulatory engagement levels. This study demonstrated how the triangulation of various sources of students’ self-regulatory data could help to unravel the complex nature of metacognitive processes.
用行为和实时自我报告测量学生在LMS中的自我调节阶段
研究强调,自我调节学习(SRL)对学习至关重要。然而,学生调节学习过程和个人需求的能力不同。为了帮助学生提高他们的SRL能力,我们需要识别学生当前的行为。具体来说,我们应用教学设计在LMS日志中创建学生在不同时间点学习的可见且有意义的标记。我们采用知识工程的方法建立了一个表征SRL阶段的近端指标框架,并在两种不同学习活动的准实验中对其进行了评估。对收集到的学生SRL数据的两个来源(自我报告和跟踪数据)的比较显示,我们的分类之间具有相对较高的一致性(加权kappa, κ = 0.74和κ = 0.68)。然而,与学生实时自我报告的行为相比,我们的指标并不总是区分相邻的SRL阶段,特别是在制定和适应阶段。我们的行为指标在对不同自我调节参与水平的SRL阶段进行分类方面也相当成功。本研究展示了学生自我调节数据的各种来源的三角测量如何有助于揭示元认知过程的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书