DESIGN AND DOUBLE BIND COMMUNICATION IN PUBLIC SERVICES—THE MODEL OF LOGICAL PARADOXES

Linda Blaasvaer, Tore Gulden
{"title":"DESIGN AND DOUBLE BIND COMMUNICATION IN PUBLIC SERVICES—THE MODEL OF LOGICAL PARADOXES","authors":"Linda Blaasvaer, Tore Gulden","doi":"10.35199/epde.2021.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes a cybernetic, systems analysis of double communication inherent in the relationship between clients and social workers. The study is oriented in the context of the Norwegian Labour and Welfare administration (NAV) to understand how to design welfare services built on a mutual trustworthy relationship and communication between the government via the social worker, client. The goal with this analysis is to develop a design method for master students studying systemic design. The method will be discussed about the implications and complexity inherent in large systems such as large organizations. Specifically, the method aims to understand design for public services with the objective to reveal and implement feedback and meta feedback functioning to create a sustainable and trustworthy system of communication between client and social worker. The method will be generic and applicable for any other discipline to understand other social, communication system. Social workers and clients behave and adjust in accordance with the systems that enable the encounters between them. Both ends of the communication know that one must behave in a specific way to achieve wanted outcomes. Clients adjust to a monetary and social systems in which shape their behavior, and the social worker being on the other side behaves in line with the administrational system, hierarchy, laws, power structures, etc. The main idea with the social welfare system is to arrange for the citizens to receive various types of benefits or support during a troublesome period. However, the communication systems may work in both the clients and the social welfare systems disfavor, this because the relationship represents different perspectives and goals. This type of communication dynamics is what Gregory Bateson termed double bind (2000/1972). Double bind is in short, a communication functioning that conveys contradicting messages. Double bind is not a countable measure; however, it describes a phenomenon destructive for communication and functioning. It may not be possible to prevent, but we can be aware of the phenomenon when designing services for the clients. The upcoming research planned is to disclose and describe various situations and kinds of functioning of double bind with and at NAV involving phenomenon, and tensions, within the encounters between clients and social workers. These will be mapped up for further analysis and make the content for the research that contribute to the field of design education and practice, and the change of communication in welfare services. References: Ashby, W. R. An introduction to cybernetics: J. Wiley. Bateson, G. (2000/1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Bateson, M.C. (2005) The Double Bind: Pathology and Creativity. Cybernetics and Human Knowing. Vol. 12, nos. 1-2, pp. 11-21. Braaen, H. et. al. (2018). User Insight – a report from Norwegian citizens, 2017 – 2018. The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV). Meadows D.H. and Wright D. Thinking in Systems: A Primer, 2009 (Earthscan, London)","PeriodicalId":374364,"journal":{"name":"DS 110: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (EPDE 2021)","volume":"10 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DS 110: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (EPDE 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2021.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes a cybernetic, systems analysis of double communication inherent in the relationship between clients and social workers. The study is oriented in the context of the Norwegian Labour and Welfare administration (NAV) to understand how to design welfare services built on a mutual trustworthy relationship and communication between the government via the social worker, client. The goal with this analysis is to develop a design method for master students studying systemic design. The method will be discussed about the implications and complexity inherent in large systems such as large organizations. Specifically, the method aims to understand design for public services with the objective to reveal and implement feedback and meta feedback functioning to create a sustainable and trustworthy system of communication between client and social worker. The method will be generic and applicable for any other discipline to understand other social, communication system. Social workers and clients behave and adjust in accordance with the systems that enable the encounters between them. Both ends of the communication know that one must behave in a specific way to achieve wanted outcomes. Clients adjust to a monetary and social systems in which shape their behavior, and the social worker being on the other side behaves in line with the administrational system, hierarchy, laws, power structures, etc. The main idea with the social welfare system is to arrange for the citizens to receive various types of benefits or support during a troublesome period. However, the communication systems may work in both the clients and the social welfare systems disfavor, this because the relationship represents different perspectives and goals. This type of communication dynamics is what Gregory Bateson termed double bind (2000/1972). Double bind is in short, a communication functioning that conveys contradicting messages. Double bind is not a countable measure; however, it describes a phenomenon destructive for communication and functioning. It may not be possible to prevent, but we can be aware of the phenomenon when designing services for the clients. The upcoming research planned is to disclose and describe various situations and kinds of functioning of double bind with and at NAV involving phenomenon, and tensions, within the encounters between clients and social workers. These will be mapped up for further analysis and make the content for the research that contribute to the field of design education and practice, and the change of communication in welfare services. References: Ashby, W. R. An introduction to cybernetics: J. Wiley. Bateson, G. (2000/1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Bateson, M.C. (2005) The Double Bind: Pathology and Creativity. Cybernetics and Human Knowing. Vol. 12, nos. 1-2, pp. 11-21. Braaen, H. et. al. (2018). User Insight – a report from Norwegian citizens, 2017 – 2018. The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV). Meadows D.H. and Wright D. Thinking in Systems: A Primer, 2009 (Earthscan, London)
公共服务中的设计与双重约束沟通——逻辑悖论的模型
这篇文章描述了一个控制论的,系统的分析双重沟通内在的客户和社会工作者之间的关系。本研究以挪威劳动和福利管理局(NAV)为背景,旨在了解如何在政府与社会工作者、客户之间建立相互信任的关系和沟通的基础上设计福利服务。本分析的目的是为研究系统设计的硕士生提供一种设计方法。该方法将讨论大型系统(如大型组织)中固有的含义和复杂性。具体来说,该方法旨在理解公共服务的设计,目的是揭示和实施反馈和元反馈功能,以创建客户和社会工作者之间可持续和值得信赖的沟通系统。该方法将是通用的,适用于任何其他学科,以了解其他社会,通信系统。社会工作者和客户的行为和调整是根据使他们能够接触的系统进行的。沟通的两端都知道,一方必须以特定的方式行事,以达到预期的结果。客户适应了货币和社会制度,这些制度塑造了他们的行为,而另一方的社会工作者的行为则与行政制度、等级制度、法律、权力结构等保持一致。社会福利制度的主要思想是安排公民在困难时期获得各种福利或支持。然而,沟通系统可能在客户和社会福利系统中都不受欢迎,这是因为这种关系代表了不同的观点和目标。这种类型的交流动态就是Gregory Bateson所说的双重约束(2000/1972)。简而言之,双重约束是一种传达矛盾信息的沟通功能。双重约束是不可计数的措施;然而,它描述了一种破坏沟通和功能的现象。这可能无法预防,但我们可以在为客户设计服务时意识到这一现象。接下来的研究计划是揭示和描述在客户和社会工作者之间的接触中,与NAV有双重束缚的各种情况和功能,包括现象和紧张关系。这些将被绘制出来作进一步的分析,并成为研究的内容,有助于设计教育和实践领域,以及福利服务沟通的变化。参考文献:Ashby, W. R.控制论导论:J. Wiley。贝特森(2000/1972)。迈向心灵的生态。芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社。贝特森,M.C.(2005)《双重束缚:病理学与创造力》。控制论与人类认知。第12卷第1-2号,第11-21页。Braaen, H.等人(2018)。用户洞察-来自挪威公民的报告,2017 - 2018。挪威劳工和福利管理局(NAV)。Meadows D.H.和Wright D. Thinking in Systems: A Primer, 2009 (Earthscan,伦敦)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信