A comparative analysis of DCCP variants (CCID2, CCID3), TCP and UDP for MPEG4 video applications

M. A. Azad, R. Mahmood, T. Mehmood
{"title":"A comparative analysis of DCCP variants (CCID2, CCID3), TCP and UDP for MPEG4 video applications","authors":"M. A. Azad, R. Mahmood, T. Mehmood","doi":"10.1109/ICICT.2009.5267215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New emerging technologies like Multimedia applications require timely delivery of information as compared to reliability. The most widely used protocols over transport layer are Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and User Datagram Protocol (UDP). Both of these have some drawbacks while using in real time applications. TCP increases delay in transfer of data but achieving reliable transfer of data while UDP does not provide any acknowledgment, hence it overcomes the problem of delay but lacking congestion control mechanism. To provide congestion control over transport layer using UDP, Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) has been designed to provide timely delivery of data and congestion control mechanism as well. In this research text, we have worked out the behavior of video applications over DCCP environment. We have analyzed the performance of MPEG4 video over transport layer using DCCP variants, UDP and TCP under competing and non-competing topology. Delay, throughput, jitter and packet loss are used to assess the performance of these protocols. Our results show that DCCP can be used as a transport layer protocol for video applications, which may result in improved throughput, reduced packet loss as compared to UDP but the delay and jitter of UDP is much lesser than DCCP variants. According to the results DCCP assures better QoS than other transport protocols for video transmission under congestion.","PeriodicalId":147005,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICT.2009.5267215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

New emerging technologies like Multimedia applications require timely delivery of information as compared to reliability. The most widely used protocols over transport layer are Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and User Datagram Protocol (UDP). Both of these have some drawbacks while using in real time applications. TCP increases delay in transfer of data but achieving reliable transfer of data while UDP does not provide any acknowledgment, hence it overcomes the problem of delay but lacking congestion control mechanism. To provide congestion control over transport layer using UDP, Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) has been designed to provide timely delivery of data and congestion control mechanism as well. In this research text, we have worked out the behavior of video applications over DCCP environment. We have analyzed the performance of MPEG4 video over transport layer using DCCP variants, UDP and TCP under competing and non-competing topology. Delay, throughput, jitter and packet loss are used to assess the performance of these protocols. Our results show that DCCP can be used as a transport layer protocol for video applications, which may result in improved throughput, reduced packet loss as compared to UDP but the delay and jitter of UDP is much lesser than DCCP variants. According to the results DCCP assures better QoS than other transport protocols for video transmission under congestion.
MPEG4视频应用的DCCP变体(CCID2, CCID3), TCP和UDP的比较分析
与可靠性相比,像多媒体应用程序这样的新兴技术需要及时地传递信息。在传输层上使用最广泛的协议是传输控制协议(TCP)和用户数据报协议(UDP)。在实时应用程序中使用时,这两种方法都有一些缺点。TCP增加了数据传输的延迟,但实现了可靠的数据传输,而UDP不提供任何确认,因此克服了延迟的问题,但缺乏拥塞控制机制。为了使用UDP提供传输层的拥塞控制,设计了数据报拥塞控制协议(DCCP)来提供数据的及时传递和拥塞控制机制。本文研究了视频应用在DCCP环境下的行为。我们分析了在竞争和非竞争拓扑下使用DCCP变体、UDP和TCP在传输层上的MPEG4视频性能。时延、吞吐量、抖动和丢包是评估这些协议性能的指标。我们的研究结果表明,DCCP可以用作视频应用的传输层协议,与UDP相比,这可能会提高吞吐量,减少数据包丢失,但UDP的延迟和抖动要比DCCP变体小得多。结果表明,在拥塞情况下,DCCP比其他传输协议保证了更好的视频传输QoS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信