Usability Evaluation of Communication Tools Used as Remote Support in Machine Service Industry: A Comparison between Microsoft Teams and Skype

Roland Ross F. Flame, Y. Prasetyo, Reny Nadlifatin, Irene Dyah Ayuwati, S. F. Persada, Thanatorn Chuenyindee
{"title":"Usability Evaluation of Communication Tools Used as Remote Support in Machine Service Industry: A Comparison between Microsoft Teams and Skype","authors":"Roland Ross F. Flame, Y. Prasetyo, Reny Nadlifatin, Irene Dyah Ayuwati, S. F. Persada, Thanatorn Chuenyindee","doi":"10.1145/3584816.3584834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to pandemic Covid-19, there is an increase and rough transition into remote work. Communication tools/platforms are softwares used by industries to facilitate different functionalities like remote technical support and communication. Especially for service industries, coordinators and engineers adapted on using these tools to support internal and external communications. For a certain machine service company, Skype and Microsoft Teams are the main communication tools used. The objective of this study is to determine the usability/user experience of these tools of engineers and coordinators on their daily activities. System Usability Scale were used to evaluate their user experience. As interpreted using the Curved Grading Scale, only the use of Microsoft Teams of Coordinators is graded as D, and the rest are graded as F. Based on the results on the user experience of coordinators and engineers using platforms Microsoft Teams and Skype, the low scores show that they are struggling with the usability of these tools due to drastic change and adaptability and limitation of activities that these tools can only perform.","PeriodicalId":113982,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3584816.3584834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to pandemic Covid-19, there is an increase and rough transition into remote work. Communication tools/platforms are softwares used by industries to facilitate different functionalities like remote technical support and communication. Especially for service industries, coordinators and engineers adapted on using these tools to support internal and external communications. For a certain machine service company, Skype and Microsoft Teams are the main communication tools used. The objective of this study is to determine the usability/user experience of these tools of engineers and coordinators on their daily activities. System Usability Scale were used to evaluate their user experience. As interpreted using the Curved Grading Scale, only the use of Microsoft Teams of Coordinators is graded as D, and the rest are graded as F. Based on the results on the user experience of coordinators and engineers using platforms Microsoft Teams and Skype, the low scores show that they are struggling with the usability of these tools due to drastic change and adaptability and limitation of activities that these tools can only perform.
机器服务行业远程支持通信工具的可用性评价:微软团队与Skype的比较
由于2019冠状病毒病(Covid-19)大流行,远程工作有所增加,过渡也很艰难。通信工具/平台是行业使用的软件,用于促进远程技术支持和通信等不同功能。特别是对于服务行业,协调员和工程师适应使用这些工具来支持内部和外部通信。对于某机器服务公司来说,Skype和Microsoft Teams是主要使用的通信工具。本研究的目的是确定工程师和协调员在日常活动中使用这些工具的可用性/用户体验。使用系统可用性量表来评估他们的用户体验。根据曲线评分量表的解释,只有Microsoft Teams of coordinator的使用被评为D,其余的都被评为f。根据协调员和工程师使用Microsoft Teams和Skype平台的用户体验结果,低分数表明他们正在努力解决这些工具的可用性,因为这些工具的变化很大,而且这些工具只能执行活动的适应性和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信