Comparison of Focus Group, QFD and Ontology on the bases of Implementation, Applications and benefits in Requirement Engineering

{"title":"Comparison of Focus Group, QFD and Ontology on the bases of Implementation, Applications and benefits in Requirement Engineering","authors":"","doi":"10.56536/jicet.v1i1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Requirements elicitation technique is the main and important part of any software project. There are hundreds of requirement elicitation techniques, and each technique has its unique characteristics and importance but the point is which to use and which do not use. There are some conditions and scenarios in which particular elicitation technique will be suitable. There are some technique which you not known. We are here to introduce some other elicitation technique. Combination of several technique can result in the clear and collect almost all requirement from the customer, user and stakeholder. The purpose of this paper is to know about these elicitation technique and might be these techniques are best for requirement gathering. In this paper we will discuss the 3 requirement elicitation techniques, their detail, advantages, disadvantages and comparison among the techniques. The three techniques are QFD, Focus Group and Ontology. \n ","PeriodicalId":145637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovative Computing and Emerging Technologies","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovative Computing and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56536/jicet.v1i1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Requirements elicitation technique is the main and important part of any software project. There are hundreds of requirement elicitation techniques, and each technique has its unique characteristics and importance but the point is which to use and which do not use. There are some conditions and scenarios in which particular elicitation technique will be suitable. There are some technique which you not known. We are here to introduce some other elicitation technique. Combination of several technique can result in the clear and collect almost all requirement from the customer, user and stakeholder. The purpose of this paper is to know about these elicitation technique and might be these techniques are best for requirement gathering. In this paper we will discuss the 3 requirement elicitation techniques, their detail, advantages, disadvantages and comparison among the techniques. The three techniques are QFD, Focus Group and Ontology.  
基于需求工程实现、应用和效益的焦点小组、QFD和本体比较
需求引出技术是任何软件项目的主要和重要组成部分。有数百种需求引出技术,每种技术都有其独特的特点和重要性,但关键是使用哪些,不使用哪些。有一些条件和场景,特定的引出技术将是合适的。有些技巧是你不知道的。我们在这里介绍一些其他的启发技巧。几种技术的结合可以导致从客户、用户和涉众那里收集几乎所有的需求。本文的目的是了解这些启发技术,这些技术可能是最适合需求收集的。本文将讨论三种需求引出技术,它们的细节,优缺点和技术之间的比较。这三种技术分别是QFD、焦点小组和本体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信