HTAs and access to rare diseases therapies: How can clinicians assist in the healthcare assessment of treatments for patients with primary immune deficiencies?

H. Chapel
{"title":"HTAs and access to rare diseases therapies: How can clinicians assist in the healthcare assessment of treatments for patients with primary immune deficiencies?","authors":"H. Chapel","doi":"10.3233/PPL-2011-0325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. Background Health Technology Assessments (HTA) in terms of therapies depend on established treatments for defined conditionswith provenoutcomes; the various treatment regimes can be compared with each other or with outcomes in the absence of treatment, in various healthcare settings. For example in the UK, the National Institute for Health Research – NIHR states that “The HTA programmeproducesindependent research about the effectiveness of different healthcare treatments ...for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS”. Given limited financial resources, it is appropriate that HTA agencies are increasingly involved in assessment of the cost effectiveness of well -established therapies, includingthose for rare diseases. Ultimately HTAs are mechanismsthat help funders and governments to control healthcare budget expenditure. An excellent example is therecentdecisionoftheIrishAuthority’sHealthTechnologyAssessmentDirectorate “not to introduce a new technology to screen donated blood for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease because it would not be cost effective to do so”. Such tools are widely used, though for rare diseases the background is often poorly understood. However their popularity is exemplified in the Journal Citation Reports for 2009, which shows that \"Health Technology Assessment\", the journal of the HTA programme, has seen a significant rise in its impact factor rising from 5.01 last year, to 6.91. In the current world-wide economic climate, clinicians, patients, healthcare providers and those with the budgets need to understand the economic strategy of HTAs. This is particularly true for those involved with rare diseases, such as primary immune deficiencies (PIDs), and applies in countries with good access to PID centres of excellence that may be at risk, as well as in those in which therapies are restricted for financial reasons. The role of HTAs in assessing the efficacy and cost effectiveness treatments for patientswithPIDsisdifficultforavarietyofreasons: difficultiesinsettingupclinical","PeriodicalId":348240,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/PPL-2011-0325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. Background Health Technology Assessments (HTA) in terms of therapies depend on established treatments for defined conditionswith provenoutcomes; the various treatment regimes can be compared with each other or with outcomes in the absence of treatment, in various healthcare settings. For example in the UK, the National Institute for Health Research – NIHR states that “The HTA programmeproducesindependent research about the effectiveness of different healthcare treatments ...for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS”. Given limited financial resources, it is appropriate that HTA agencies are increasingly involved in assessment of the cost effectiveness of well -established therapies, includingthose for rare diseases. Ultimately HTAs are mechanismsthat help funders and governments to control healthcare budget expenditure. An excellent example is therecentdecisionoftheIrishAuthority’sHealthTechnologyAssessmentDirectorate “not to introduce a new technology to screen donated blood for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease because it would not be cost effective to do so”. Such tools are widely used, though for rare diseases the background is often poorly understood. However their popularity is exemplified in the Journal Citation Reports for 2009, which shows that "Health Technology Assessment", the journal of the HTA programme, has seen a significant rise in its impact factor rising from 5.01 last year, to 6.91. In the current world-wide economic climate, clinicians, patients, healthcare providers and those with the budgets need to understand the economic strategy of HTAs. This is particularly true for those involved with rare diseases, such as primary immune deficiencies (PIDs), and applies in countries with good access to PID centres of excellence that may be at risk, as well as in those in which therapies are restricted for financial reasons. The role of HTAs in assessing the efficacy and cost effectiveness treatments for patientswithPIDsisdifficultforavarietyofreasons: difficultiesinsettingupclinical
hta与罕见病治疗的可及性:临床医生如何协助对原发性免疫缺陷患者的治疗进行保健评估?
1. 背景:就治疗而言,卫生技术评估(HTA)依赖于针对已确定疾病的既定治疗方法和已证实的结果;不同的治疗方案可以相互比较,也可以在不同的卫生保健环境中与没有治疗的结果进行比较。例如,在英国,国家健康研究所(NIHR)表示,“HTA项目对不同医疗保健治疗的有效性进行了独立研究……为那些在NHS中使用、管理和提供护理的人”。鉴于财政资源有限,HTA机构越来越多地参与评估已确立的治疗方法(包括罕见病治疗方法)的成本效益是适当的。最终,hta是帮助资助者和政府控制医疗预算支出的机制。一个很好的例子是卫生部卫生技术评估局最近决定“不引入一种新技术来筛查捐献的血液是否患有克雅氏病,因为这样做的成本效益不高”。这些工具被广泛使用,尽管对于罕见疾病的背景往往知之甚少。然而,它们的受欢迎程度在2009年的期刊引用报告中得到了体现,该报告显示,HTA项目的期刊“卫生技术评估”的影响因子显著上升,从去年的5.01上升到6.91。在当前世界范围的经济气候下,临床医生、患者、医疗保健提供者和那些有预算的人需要了解卫生保健协会的经济战略。对于那些患有原发性免疫缺陷等罕见疾病的人来说尤其如此,这适用于那些能够很好地利用可能存在风险的原发性免疫缺陷卓越中心的国家,以及那些因经济原因而限制治疗的国家。由于各种原因,hta在评估pidas患者治疗的疗效和成本效益方面的作用很困难:难以建立临床
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信