{"title":"The Benighted Hand Mechanism","authors":"J. Daniel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2716227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper designs a mechanism that generalizes Judge Learned Hand’s negligence liability tests from his classic opinions in T. J. HOOPER (1932) and CARROLL TOWING (1947). The “Benighted Hand” mechanism incentivizes truthful reporting of the agents’ private costs of bilateral caretaking when agents also face different effectiveness of care and shares of injury costs. In “The Problem of Social Cost” (1960), Ronald Coase noted that Judges may not have the requisite knowledge of the costs of caretaking to determine the optimal level of care, but he and much of the subsequent literature simply treat this problem as a source of exogenous transaction costs. The mechanism design framework treats costs of obtaining private information endogenously, by incentivizing strategic agents to truthfully reveal their private information. The resulting liability schedule is efficient, but not generally compensatory. It allocates the full costs of accidents (including the costs of precaution) equally among the parties.","PeriodicalId":410319,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Torts eJournal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Torts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2716227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper designs a mechanism that generalizes Judge Learned Hand’s negligence liability tests from his classic opinions in T. J. HOOPER (1932) and CARROLL TOWING (1947). The “Benighted Hand” mechanism incentivizes truthful reporting of the agents’ private costs of bilateral caretaking when agents also face different effectiveness of care and shares of injury costs. In “The Problem of Social Cost” (1960), Ronald Coase noted that Judges may not have the requisite knowledge of the costs of caretaking to determine the optimal level of care, but he and much of the subsequent literature simply treat this problem as a source of exogenous transaction costs. The mechanism design framework treats costs of obtaining private information endogenously, by incentivizing strategic agents to truthfully reveal their private information. The resulting liability schedule is efficient, but not generally compensatory. It allocates the full costs of accidents (including the costs of precaution) equally among the parties.
本文从汉德法官T. J. HOOPER(1932)和CARROLL towwing(1947)的经典观点中设计了一种机制来概括汉德法官的过失责任检验。当代理人面临不同的护理效果和伤害成本分担时,“愚昧之手”机制激励代理人如实报告双边护理的私人成本。在《社会成本问题》(1960)中,罗纳德·科斯指出,法官可能不具备必要的护理成本知识来确定最佳护理水平,但他和随后的许多文献只是将这个问题视为外生交易成本的来源。机制设计框架通过激励战略代理人如实披露其私有信息,内生地处理获取私有信息的成本。由此产生的责任时间表是有效的,但通常不是补偿性的。它将事故的全部费用(包括预防费用)平均分配给各方。