A Comparison Between Interpolation Method and Neural Network Approach in 3D Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine

Muhammad Ibadurrahman Arrasyid Supriyanto, R. Sarno, C. Fatichah, Aziz Fajar
{"title":"A Comparison Between Interpolation Method and Neural Network Approach in 3D Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine","authors":"Muhammad Ibadurrahman Arrasyid Supriyanto, R. Sarno, C. Fatichah, Aziz Fajar","doi":"10.1109/ICCoSITE57641.2023.10127803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher image reconstruction with excellent structural detail allows experts to perform accurate analysis, especially on the smallest organ details. The interpolation method that approaches the problem of medical image reconstruction, especially 3D, still causes serious problems. The medical image produced by the interpolation method produces blurred or smooth lines on some parts of the organ. This can cause errors in the medical analysis that will be carried out if the reconstruction results are problematic. For this reason, a method is needed that can reconstruct images well without producing blur but does not require very large computer resources. This study aims to evaluate and compare the quality of 3D magnetic resonance imaging medical images reconstructed using interpolation methods and artificial neural network architectures in the DICOM data format. This study evaluates and compares the quality of 3D magnetic resonance imaging medical images reconstructed using interpolation methods and artificial neural network architectures. The test scenario was performed using images from the ADNI dataset and comparing the output results using a variational autoencoder and a multi-level densely connected super-resolution network on 3D data with existing interpolation methods. The evaluation was done using two metrics, i.e., SSIM and PSNR. The results showed that the variational autoencoder method has the highest SSIM and PSNR values, indicating it has the highest image quality among the three methods, while the mDCSRN method has the lowest SSIM and PSNR values, meaning it has the lowest image quality.","PeriodicalId":256184,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology and Engineering (ICCoSITE)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology and Engineering (ICCoSITE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCoSITE57641.2023.10127803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Higher image reconstruction with excellent structural detail allows experts to perform accurate analysis, especially on the smallest organ details. The interpolation method that approaches the problem of medical image reconstruction, especially 3D, still causes serious problems. The medical image produced by the interpolation method produces blurred or smooth lines on some parts of the organ. This can cause errors in the medical analysis that will be carried out if the reconstruction results are problematic. For this reason, a method is needed that can reconstruct images well without producing blur but does not require very large computer resources. This study aims to evaluate and compare the quality of 3D magnetic resonance imaging medical images reconstructed using interpolation methods and artificial neural network architectures in the DICOM data format. This study evaluates and compares the quality of 3D magnetic resonance imaging medical images reconstructed using interpolation methods and artificial neural network architectures. The test scenario was performed using images from the ADNI dataset and comparing the output results using a variational autoencoder and a multi-level densely connected super-resolution network on 3D data with existing interpolation methods. The evaluation was done using two metrics, i.e., SSIM and PSNR. The results showed that the variational autoencoder method has the highest SSIM and PSNR values, indicating it has the highest image quality among the three methods, while the mDCSRN method has the lowest SSIM and PSNR values, meaning it has the lowest image quality.
插值方法与神经网络方法在医学三维数字成像与通信中的比较
具有优异结构细节的更高图像重建使专家能够进行准确的分析,特别是在最小的器官细节上。针对医学图像重建问题,特别是三维图像的插值方法仍然存在严重的问题。该插值方法产生的医学图像在器官的某些部位产生模糊或平滑的线条。如果重建结果有问题,这可能会导致医学分析出现错误。因此,需要一种既不产生模糊又不需要大量计算机资源的方法来很好地重建图像。本研究旨在评估和比较DICOM数据格式下使用插值方法和人工神经网络架构重建的三维磁共振成像医学图像的质量。本研究评估和比较了采用插值方法和人工神经网络架构重建的三维磁共振成像医学图像的质量。使用ADNI数据集中的图像进行测试,并将使用变分自编码器和多级密集连接超分辨率网络对3D数据的输出结果与现有插值方法进行比较。评估采用两个指标,即SSIM和PSNR。结果表明,变分自编码器方法的SSIM和PSNR值最高,说明三种方法的图像质量最高;mDCSRN方法的SSIM和PSNR值最低,说明三种方法的图像质量最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信