Empowering Our Children to Dream Without Limitations: A Call to Revisit the ‘Natural Born Citizen’ Requirement in the Obama Era

Claudine V. Pease-Wingenter
{"title":"Empowering Our Children to Dream Without Limitations: A Call to Revisit the ‘Natural Born Citizen’ Requirement in the Obama Era","authors":"Claudine V. Pease-Wingenter","doi":"10.5070/C7291021192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the unique requirement in the U.S. Constitution that American presidents must be 'natural born' citizens. Although U.S. citizenship is constitutionally required to serve in other elected offices, the presidential requirement of 'natural born' citizenship is anomalous. Indeed, it has been criticized as establishing a type of second-class citizenship by excluding whole segments of our citizenry from ever aspiring to our country’s highest office. For example, citizens are excluded from eligibility if they were born outside the United States while their parents were serving our nation in the military, if they came to this country through adoption by American citizens, or if they were born in another country but immigrated and were eventually naturalized. Indeed, because naturalized citizens are excluded by the “natural born” requirement, the exclusion now disproportionately impacts people of color since most naturalized citizens are originally from Latin America or Asia.The 'natural born' citizen requirement directly impacts only a handful of politicians who might campaign for the White House but for their foreign birth. Nonetheless, the requirement indirectly impacts large numbers of children who can never aspire to the presidency due to a fluke of birth, over which they had no control. Such ineligibility is tragic because our nation’s highest office is a broad metaphor for childhood aspirations. The dreams of many children are stunted due to an anachronistic requirement in the Constitution. Moreover, the curtailing impact of the 'natural born' requirement on these children’s dreams is particularly ironic and out of place at the dawn of the Obama administration. The recent improbable election and inauguration of Barack Obama has inspired children around our country to dream big. If the son of a Kenyan shepherd can become the leader of the free world, surely no dream is out of reach if one works hard in school and perseveres. For American children born abroad, however, the dream of the presidency is still out of reach unless the out-dated 'natural born' citizenship requirement is removed. Modern scholars have consistently concluded that the 'natural born' requirement has outlived any usefulness it once had, and it is blatantly discriminatory. Nonetheless, past efforts to eliminate the requirement have not been successful. It is always a slow, arduous process to effect any constitutional amendment. To be successful, there must be a sizeable and passionate group willing to do the hard work to get it done. This article advocates that the families of children excluded by the 'natural born' requirement would be the best candidates to take up this cause. Specifically, a powerful alliance could be forged between parents serving in the military, the parents of foreign-born adoptees, and the parents of immigrant children.","PeriodicalId":411033,"journal":{"name":"Chicana/o-Latina/o Law Review","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chicana/o-Latina/o Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/C7291021192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the unique requirement in the U.S. Constitution that American presidents must be 'natural born' citizens. Although U.S. citizenship is constitutionally required to serve in other elected offices, the presidential requirement of 'natural born' citizenship is anomalous. Indeed, it has been criticized as establishing a type of second-class citizenship by excluding whole segments of our citizenry from ever aspiring to our country’s highest office. For example, citizens are excluded from eligibility if they were born outside the United States while their parents were serving our nation in the military, if they came to this country through adoption by American citizens, or if they were born in another country but immigrated and were eventually naturalized. Indeed, because naturalized citizens are excluded by the “natural born” requirement, the exclusion now disproportionately impacts people of color since most naturalized citizens are originally from Latin America or Asia.The 'natural born' citizen requirement directly impacts only a handful of politicians who might campaign for the White House but for their foreign birth. Nonetheless, the requirement indirectly impacts large numbers of children who can never aspire to the presidency due to a fluke of birth, over which they had no control. Such ineligibility is tragic because our nation’s highest office is a broad metaphor for childhood aspirations. The dreams of many children are stunted due to an anachronistic requirement in the Constitution. Moreover, the curtailing impact of the 'natural born' requirement on these children’s dreams is particularly ironic and out of place at the dawn of the Obama administration. The recent improbable election and inauguration of Barack Obama has inspired children around our country to dream big. If the son of a Kenyan shepherd can become the leader of the free world, surely no dream is out of reach if one works hard in school and perseveres. For American children born abroad, however, the dream of the presidency is still out of reach unless the out-dated 'natural born' citizenship requirement is removed. Modern scholars have consistently concluded that the 'natural born' requirement has outlived any usefulness it once had, and it is blatantly discriminatory. Nonetheless, past efforts to eliminate the requirement have not been successful. It is always a slow, arduous process to effect any constitutional amendment. To be successful, there must be a sizeable and passionate group willing to do the hard work to get it done. This article advocates that the families of children excluded by the 'natural born' requirement would be the best candidates to take up this cause. Specifically, a powerful alliance could be forged between parents serving in the military, the parents of foreign-born adoptees, and the parents of immigrant children.
赋予我们的孩子无限的梦想:呼吁重新审视奥巴马时代“天生公民”的要求
本文考察了美国宪法中关于美国总统必须是“天生的”公民的独特要求。虽然宪法规定在其他选举产生的职位任职需要美国公民身份,但总统对“天生”公民身份的要求是反常的。事实上,它被批评为建立了一种二等公民身份,因为它将我们的整个公民群体排除在我们国家的最高职位之外。例如,如果公民出生在美国以外,而他们的父母在军队中为我们的国家服务,如果他们通过美国公民收养来到这个国家,或者如果他们出生在另一个国家但移民并最终入籍,他们就被排除在资格之外。事实上,由于入籍公民被排除在“自然出生”的要求之外,这种排除现在对有色人种的影响不成比例,因为大多数入籍公民最初来自拉丁美洲或亚洲。“自然出生”公民的要求只会直接影响到少数可能竞选白宫的政客,但他们的出生地是外国。尽管如此,这一要求间接影响了大量的孩子,他们由于出生的偶然,无法控制,永远无法渴望成为总统。这种不合格是可悲的,因为我们国家的最高职位是童年愿望的广泛隐喻。由于宪法中不合时宜的要求,许多孩子的梦想受到阻碍。此外,“天生”这一要求对这些孩子梦想的削弱影响,在奥巴马政府上台之初尤其具有讽刺意味,也不合时宜。最近巴拉克·奥巴马出人意料的当选和就职激励了我们国家的孩子们要有远大的梦想。如果肯尼亚牧羊人的儿子能成为自由世界的领袖,那么只要他在学校努力学习并坚持不懈,当然没有什么梦想是遥不可及的。然而,对于在国外出生的美国孩子来说,除非取消过时的“自然出生”的公民身份要求,否则总统的梦想仍然遥不可及。现代学者一致认为,“天生”的要求已经过时了,它曾经有过任何用处,而且它是公然歧视的。尽管如此,过去消除这一要求的努力并不成功。实施任何宪法修正案都是一个缓慢而艰巨的过程。要想取得成功,必须有一个规模庞大、充满激情的团队,愿意付出艰苦的努力。这篇文章主张,被排除在“自然出生”要求之外的孩子的家庭将是从事这一事业的最佳人选。具体来说,在军队服役的父母、外国出生的被收养者的父母和移民儿童的父母之间可以建立一个强大的联盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信