A Goal-directed Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Opioid Prescriptions After Orthopaedic Procedures

K. Choo, T. Grace, Krishn Khanna, J. Barry, Erik N. Hansen
{"title":"A Goal-directed Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Opioid Prescriptions After Orthopaedic Procedures","authors":"K. Choo, T. Grace, Krishn Khanna, J. Barry, Erik N. Hansen","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-19-00109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Orthopaedic surgeons are increasingly aware of deleterious effects of the opioid epidemic and the association between overprescription and diversion toward nonmedical opioid use or substance abuse. Opiate prescriptions at the time of hospital discharge have been identified as target for intervention. This study describes the successful outcome of a goal-directed intervention aimed at decreasing opioid overprescription by providing routine feedback to providers regarding their prescribing patterns. Methods: The amount of opioid medications, quantified as oral morphine equivalents (OMEs), provided to opioid-naive adult patients on discharge after orthopaedic surgery was prospectively collected. As part of an institutional quality improvement initiative, medical providers received reports every 2 months detailing median discharge OMEs prescribed, trended over time. After 6 months, a retrospective comparison was done between preintervention and intervention patient cohorts. Results: There were 401 patients in the preintervention cohort and 429 patients in the intervention cohort. Both groups were similar in regard to age, sex, rates of depression, surgical time, length of stay, orthopaedic subspecialty, and inpatient opioid requirement before discharge. Patients in the intervention cohort were prescribed markedly fewer opioid medications by 25%, equivalent to 20 tablets of 5-mg oxycodone IR (450 versus 600 OMEs, P < 0.001). Despite these opioid medications, opioid refill rates during the first 90 days after discharge did not markedly change between groups. Discussion: It is critical to judiciously treat postoperative pain while avoiding opioid overprescription. This study demonstrated the outcome of a goal-directed initiative to decrease overprescription of opioid medications. The initiative reduced discharge opioid prescriptions yet did not increase the risk of requiring a prescription refill in the postoperative period. This indicates that such an approach can result in opioid reduction, while still providing appropriate care and pain control for patients.","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-19-00109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Introduction: Orthopaedic surgeons are increasingly aware of deleterious effects of the opioid epidemic and the association between overprescription and diversion toward nonmedical opioid use or substance abuse. Opiate prescriptions at the time of hospital discharge have been identified as target for intervention. This study describes the successful outcome of a goal-directed intervention aimed at decreasing opioid overprescription by providing routine feedback to providers regarding their prescribing patterns. Methods: The amount of opioid medications, quantified as oral morphine equivalents (OMEs), provided to opioid-naive adult patients on discharge after orthopaedic surgery was prospectively collected. As part of an institutional quality improvement initiative, medical providers received reports every 2 months detailing median discharge OMEs prescribed, trended over time. After 6 months, a retrospective comparison was done between preintervention and intervention patient cohorts. Results: There were 401 patients in the preintervention cohort and 429 patients in the intervention cohort. Both groups were similar in regard to age, sex, rates of depression, surgical time, length of stay, orthopaedic subspecialty, and inpatient opioid requirement before discharge. Patients in the intervention cohort were prescribed markedly fewer opioid medications by 25%, equivalent to 20 tablets of 5-mg oxycodone IR (450 versus 600 OMEs, P < 0.001). Despite these opioid medications, opioid refill rates during the first 90 days after discharge did not markedly change between groups. Discussion: It is critical to judiciously treat postoperative pain while avoiding opioid overprescription. This study demonstrated the outcome of a goal-directed initiative to decrease overprescription of opioid medications. The initiative reduced discharge opioid prescriptions yet did not increase the risk of requiring a prescription refill in the postoperative period. This indicates that such an approach can result in opioid reduction, while still providing appropriate care and pain control for patients.
目标导向的质量改进倡议,以减少骨科手术后阿片类药物处方
导读:骨科医生越来越意识到阿片类药物流行的有害影响,以及过度处方与转向非医用阿片类药物使用或药物滥用之间的联系。出院时的阿片类药物处方已被确定为干预的目标。本研究描述了目标导向干预的成功结果,旨在通过向提供者提供关于其处方模式的常规反馈来减少阿片类药物过度处方。方法:前瞻性地收集骨科术后出院时初见阿片类药物的成人患者口服吗啡当量(OMEs)的阿片类药物用量。作为机构质量改进倡议的一部分,医疗服务提供者每2个月收到一次报告,详细说明按时间趋势计算的出院中位数OMEs处方。6个月后,对干预前和干预后患者进行回顾性比较。结果:干预前队列401例,干预后队列429例。两组在年龄、性别、抑郁发生率、手术时间、住院时间、骨科亚专科和出院前住院阿片类药物需求方面相似。干预组患者服用的阿片类药物明显减少了25%,相当于20片5mg羟考酮IR(450片vs 600片,P < 0.001)。尽管使用了这些阿片类药物,但出院后90天内阿片类药物的补充率在两组之间没有明显变化。讨论:在避免阿片类药物过度处方的同时,明智地治疗术后疼痛至关重要。这项研究证明了目标导向的减少阿片类药物过度处方的举措的结果。该倡议减少了出院阿片类药物处方,但没有增加术后需要重新处方的风险。这表明这种方法可以减少阿片类药物,同时仍然为患者提供适当的护理和疼痛控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信