Bibliographic Index "History of Ukraine": Reflection of the National Liberation Movement, Unification and «Liberation» of Ukrainian Lands in the 20–50-s of the 20-th century

O. Dudnik
{"title":"Bibliographic Index \"History of Ukraine\": Reflection of the National Liberation Movement, Unification and «Liberation» of Ukrainian Lands in the 20–50-s of the 20-th century","authors":"O. Dudnik","doi":"10.32461/2409-9805.1.2023.276760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is to find out the accordance the titles of the structure parts of the scientific auxiliary bibliographic index (annual edition) «History of Ukraine» for the years 2000–2019, the content of the descriptions of the works presented in it, es well of the historiography, and legislation of Ukraine on the questions of the national liberation struggle of the Ukrainian people, reunification and liberation of Ukrainian lands in the 20s–50s of the XX century. Research methodology: the principles of historicism, objectivity, systematics and comprehensiveness were applied, as well as – general methods of scientific research – analysis, synthesis, comparison. Scientific novelty: for the first time, an attempt was made to show the inconsistency of the titles of separate subsections and rubrics in the content of the bibliographic index «History of Ukraine» for the years 2000–2019 with the titles of the descriptions of the researches which presented in it. Conclusions. The structure of the bibliographic index «History of Ukraine» does not have a subsection or rubric on the history of the national liberation struggle of the Ukrainian people in the 20th century, while in the manual presents many descriptions of researches on this topic. Simultaneously, the bibliographic edition contains structural parts, the titles of which reflect Soviet historiography and propaganda due to the use the words-ideologemes: «liberation» and «reunification» which had already been refuted by modern researchers as the «expulsion» and «unification» or «joining». Therefore, bibliographers should take into account he dominant titles of the submitted descriptions of works, to annotate them and study the historiography of the issues in detail. Such state of the leading bibliographic edition is also the result of the inconsistent policy of national memory on these topics, the lack of appropriate legislation for a long time, and now its imperfection. Not a single law of Ukraine, which deals with the issue of r national liberation struggle in the 20th century, contains a definition of this term. \nKey words: bibliographic index «History of Ukraine», content structure, topics, national liberation movement, expulsion, unification of Ukrainian lands, law of Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":318806,"journal":{"name":"Scientific journal “Library Science. Record Studies. Informology”","volume":"257 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific journal “Library Science. Record Studies. Informology”","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32461/2409-9805.1.2023.276760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to find out the accordance the titles of the structure parts of the scientific auxiliary bibliographic index (annual edition) «History of Ukraine» for the years 2000–2019, the content of the descriptions of the works presented in it, es well of the historiography, and legislation of Ukraine on the questions of the national liberation struggle of the Ukrainian people, reunification and liberation of Ukrainian lands in the 20s–50s of the XX century. Research methodology: the principles of historicism, objectivity, systematics and comprehensiveness were applied, as well as – general methods of scientific research – analysis, synthesis, comparison. Scientific novelty: for the first time, an attempt was made to show the inconsistency of the titles of separate subsections and rubrics in the content of the bibliographic index «History of Ukraine» for the years 2000–2019 with the titles of the descriptions of the researches which presented in it. Conclusions. The structure of the bibliographic index «History of Ukraine» does not have a subsection or rubric on the history of the national liberation struggle of the Ukrainian people in the 20th century, while in the manual presents many descriptions of researches on this topic. Simultaneously, the bibliographic edition contains structural parts, the titles of which reflect Soviet historiography and propaganda due to the use the words-ideologemes: «liberation» and «reunification» which had already been refuted by modern researchers as the «expulsion» and «unification» or «joining». Therefore, bibliographers should take into account he dominant titles of the submitted descriptions of works, to annotate them and study the historiography of the issues in detail. Such state of the leading bibliographic edition is also the result of the inconsistent policy of national memory on these topics, the lack of appropriate legislation for a long time, and now its imperfection. Not a single law of Ukraine, which deals with the issue of r national liberation struggle in the 20th century, contains a definition of this term. Key words: bibliographic index «History of Ukraine», content structure, topics, national liberation movement, expulsion, unification of Ukrainian lands, law of Ukraine.
书目索引“乌克兰的历史”:反映民族解放运动,统一和“解放”乌克兰土地在20世纪20- 50年代
研究的目的是找出2000-2019年科学辅助书目索引(年度版)“乌克兰历史”的结构部分的标题,其中所呈现的作品描述的内容,以及乌克兰关于乌克兰人民的民族解放斗争,20世纪20 - 50年代乌克兰土地的统一和解放问题的历史编纂和立法。研究方法论:运用历史决定论、客观性、系统性、全面性原则,运用科学研究的一般方法——分析、综合、比较。科学新颖性:首次尝试显示2000-2019年书目索引“乌克兰历史”内容中单独章节和标题的标题与其中提出的研究描述的标题不一致。结论。书目索引“乌克兰历史”的结构没有关于20世纪乌克兰人民民族解放斗争历史的分节或标题,而在手册中提出了许多关于这一主题的研究描述。同时,参考书目版包含结构部分,其标题反映了苏联的史学和宣传,因为使用了意识形态词:“解放”和“统一”,这些词已经被现代研究人员驳斥为“驱逐”和“统一”或“加入”。因此,书目编纂者应考虑到所提交作品描述的主导标题,对其进行注释,并对问题进行详细的史学研究。书目版主导的这种状态,也是民族记忆在这些主题上政策不一致、长期缺乏适当立法、目前尚不完善的结果。乌克兰在处理20世纪民族解放斗争问题时,没有一部法律包含这个词的定义。关键词:书目索引《乌克兰史》,内容结构,主题,民族解放运动,驱逐,乌克兰土地统一,乌克兰法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信