Diverse approaches to conceptualising positive ageing: A scoping review

Tessa Pocock, A. Woodward, J. Wiles, Deborah L Raphael, Melody Smith
{"title":"Diverse approaches to conceptualising positive ageing: A scoping review","authors":"Tessa Pocock, A. Woodward, J. Wiles, Deborah L Raphael, Melody Smith","doi":"10.1080/1177083X.2022.2090968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To be realistic and meaningful, positive ageing conceptualisations should involve a diverse range of perspectives. Yet, problematically, perspectives are often distinguished as ‘researcher versus older adult’. In this scoping review, we suggest that distinguishing perspectives based on the data collection and interpretation approach is more meaningful. Guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework, we explored diverse positive ageing literature (from across conceptual origins and discourses) to clarify how positive ageing for community-dwelling older adults has been conceptualised. To reflect diverse data and interpretation perspectives, we considered both etic (closed/validatory) and emic (open/exploratory) approaches and developed a conceptual model of positive ageing that consolidated diverse literature and approaches. We synthesised 75 articles and determined that etic and emic approaches generally included similar features; however, emic approaches considered more comprehensive and complex features. Our multidimensional and holistic positive ageing model illustrates the range of unique factors which contribute to the health and well-being of older adults. Furthermore, we find that positive ageing literature largely focuses on individualistic behaviours. Future positive ageing research and policy would have more traction, in our view, if it included wider structural environments to stimulate real-world change. We offer our conceptual model as a useful guide.","PeriodicalId":308502,"journal":{"name":"Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2022.2090968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT To be realistic and meaningful, positive ageing conceptualisations should involve a diverse range of perspectives. Yet, problematically, perspectives are often distinguished as ‘researcher versus older adult’. In this scoping review, we suggest that distinguishing perspectives based on the data collection and interpretation approach is more meaningful. Guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework, we explored diverse positive ageing literature (from across conceptual origins and discourses) to clarify how positive ageing for community-dwelling older adults has been conceptualised. To reflect diverse data and interpretation perspectives, we considered both etic (closed/validatory) and emic (open/exploratory) approaches and developed a conceptual model of positive ageing that consolidated diverse literature and approaches. We synthesised 75 articles and determined that etic and emic approaches generally included similar features; however, emic approaches considered more comprehensive and complex features. Our multidimensional and holistic positive ageing model illustrates the range of unique factors which contribute to the health and well-being of older adults. Furthermore, we find that positive ageing literature largely focuses on individualistic behaviours. Future positive ageing research and policy would have more traction, in our view, if it included wider structural environments to stimulate real-world change. We offer our conceptual model as a useful guide.
概念化积极老龄化的不同方法:范围审查
为了现实和有意义,积极的老龄化概念应该包括各种各样的观点。然而,有问题的是,观点经常被区分为“研究人员与老年人”。在这篇范围综述中,我们建议基于数据收集和解释方法来区分视角更有意义。在Arksey和O 'Malley的范围审查框架的指导下,我们探索了不同的积极老龄化文献(来自不同的概念起源和话语),以澄清如何将社区居住的老年人的积极老龄化概念化。为了反映不同的数据和解释视角,我们考虑了客位(封闭/验证)和主位(开放/探索性)方法,并开发了一个整合了不同文献和方法的积极老龄化概念模型。我们综合了75篇文章,确定外源性和外源性方法通常包含相似的特征;然而,emic方法考虑了更全面和复杂的特征。我们的多维和整体的积极老龄化模型说明了有助于老年人健康和福祉的独特因素的范围。此外,我们发现积极老龄化文献主要关注个人主义行为。在我们看来,未来积极的老龄化研究和政策,如果包括更广泛的结构环境来刺激现实世界的变化,将会更有吸引力。我们提供我们的概念模型作为有用的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书