Passive hip flexion does not increase during or following ultrasound treatment of the hamstrings musculature

L. Boone, C. Ingersoll, M. Cordova
{"title":"Passive hip flexion does not increase during or following ultrasound treatment of the hamstrings musculature","authors":"L. Boone, C. Ingersoll, M. Cordova","doi":"10.1080/15438620009512555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The stretching window is a theoretical concept that refers to the period of maximum tissue temperature increase during and immediately following ultrasound treatment. This study was conducted to determine if an optimal time period exists for combining ultrasonic heat and stretching to obtain maximum joint range of motion; essentially, evaluate the existence of a stretching window. A 1 x 5 factorial design was used. The independent variable was time with 5 levels (5 min into treatment or 1½, 3½, 6, or 10 min following treatment). The dependent variable was maximum passive hip flexion range of motion (PHROM). Fifty healthy graduate and undergraduate students (27 males, 23 females) aged 24.1 y ±3.4 (s.d.), height 174.1 cm ± 16.2 (s.d.), and mass 74.1 kg ± 16.6 (s.d.) participated in the study. All subjects were free from significant lower extremity injury and had less than 90° PHROM. A range of motion pre‐test was measured for each subject. Each subject then had a range of motion post‐test taken 5 min into and at l½, 3½, 6, and 10 min following a 3 MHz ultrasound treatment of the hamstrings musculature using an electrogoniometer. A one‐way ANCOVA (with pre‐test ROM as the covariate) was used to determine if a difference in ROM existed between groups. No difference in PHROM existed between any of the 5 treatment groups (F(4, 44) = 0.28, P = 0.889). A theoretical stretching window possibly exists, since a maximum tissue temperature increase has been measured during and immediately following ultrasound treatment. However, this theoretical stretching window does not appear to translate into increased tissue extensibility in the hamstring musculature either during or following ultrasound treatment.","PeriodicalId":403174,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15438620009512555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The stretching window is a theoretical concept that refers to the period of maximum tissue temperature increase during and immediately following ultrasound treatment. This study was conducted to determine if an optimal time period exists for combining ultrasonic heat and stretching to obtain maximum joint range of motion; essentially, evaluate the existence of a stretching window. A 1 x 5 factorial design was used. The independent variable was time with 5 levels (5 min into treatment or 1½, 3½, 6, or 10 min following treatment). The dependent variable was maximum passive hip flexion range of motion (PHROM). Fifty healthy graduate and undergraduate students (27 males, 23 females) aged 24.1 y ±3.4 (s.d.), height 174.1 cm ± 16.2 (s.d.), and mass 74.1 kg ± 16.6 (s.d.) participated in the study. All subjects were free from significant lower extremity injury and had less than 90° PHROM. A range of motion pre‐test was measured for each subject. Each subject then had a range of motion post‐test taken 5 min into and at l½, 3½, 6, and 10 min following a 3 MHz ultrasound treatment of the hamstrings musculature using an electrogoniometer. A one‐way ANCOVA (with pre‐test ROM as the covariate) was used to determine if a difference in ROM existed between groups. No difference in PHROM existed between any of the 5 treatment groups (F(4, 44) = 0.28, P = 0.889). A theoretical stretching window possibly exists, since a maximum tissue temperature increase has been measured during and immediately following ultrasound treatment. However, this theoretical stretching window does not appear to translate into increased tissue extensibility in the hamstring musculature either during or following ultrasound treatment.
被动髋屈曲不增加期间或之后超声治疗腘绳肌组织
拉伸窗是一个理论概念,指的是超声治疗期间和之后组织温度最大升高的时间段。本研究旨在确定是否存在超声加热和拉伸相结合以获得最大关节活动范围的最佳时间段;本质上,求出一个伸缩窗口的存在性。采用1 × 5因子设计。自变量为5个水平的时间(治疗前5分钟或治疗后1½,3½,6或10分钟)。因变量为最大被动髋关节屈曲活动范围(PHROM)。年龄24.1 y±3.4 (s.d),身高174.1 cm±16.2 (s.d),体重74.1 kg±16.6 (s.d),健康的研究生和本科生50名,男27名,女23名。所有受试者均无明显下肢损伤,PHROM小于90°。测量每个受试者的运动预测范围。然后,每个受试者在使用电测器对腘绳肌进行3mhz超声治疗后的5分钟、1.5分钟、3.5分钟、6分钟和10分钟进行活动范围后测。采用单向方差分析(以预测ROM为协变量)来确定组间ROM是否存在差异。5个治疗组间PHROM差异无统计学意义(F(4,44) = 0.28, P = 0.889)。理论上的拉伸窗口可能存在,因为在超声治疗期间和之后立即测量了最大组织温度升高。然而,在超声治疗期间或之后,这个理论上的拉伸窗口似乎并没有转化为腿筋肌肉组织可伸伸性的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信