Tacking Regime Changes in the Markets

Jun Chen, E. Tsang
{"title":"Tacking Regime Changes in the Markets","authors":"Jun Chen, E. Tsang","doi":"10.1109/CIFEr.2019.8759111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our previous work, we showed that regime changes in the market are retrospectively detectable using historic data in directional changes (DC). In this paper, we build on such results and show that DC indicators can be used for market tracking - using data up to the present - to understand what is going on in the market. In particular, we wanted to track the market to see whether the market is entering an abnormally volatile regime. The proposed approach used DC indicator values observed in the past to model the normal regime of a market (in which volatility is normal) or an abnormal regime (in which volatility is abnormally high). Given a particular value observed in the current market, we used a naive Bayes model to calculate independently two probabilities: one for the market being in the normal regime and one for it being in the abnormal regime. These two probabilities were combined to decide which regime the market was in, two decision rules were examined: a Simple Rule and a Stricter Rule. We used DJIA, FTSE 100 and S&P 500 data from 2007 to 2010 to build the Bayes model. The model was used to track the S&P 500 market from 2010 to 2012, which saw two spells of abnormal regimes, as identified by our previous work, with the benefit of hindsight. The tracking method presented in this paper, with either decision rule, managed to pick up both spells of regime changes accurately. The tracking signals could be useful to market participants. This study potentially lays the foundation of a practical financial early warning system.","PeriodicalId":368382,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering & Economics (CIFEr)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering & Economics (CIFEr)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIFEr.2019.8759111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In our previous work, we showed that regime changes in the market are retrospectively detectable using historic data in directional changes (DC). In this paper, we build on such results and show that DC indicators can be used for market tracking - using data up to the present - to understand what is going on in the market. In particular, we wanted to track the market to see whether the market is entering an abnormally volatile regime. The proposed approach used DC indicator values observed in the past to model the normal regime of a market (in which volatility is normal) or an abnormal regime (in which volatility is abnormally high). Given a particular value observed in the current market, we used a naive Bayes model to calculate independently two probabilities: one for the market being in the normal regime and one for it being in the abnormal regime. These two probabilities were combined to decide which regime the market was in, two decision rules were examined: a Simple Rule and a Stricter Rule. We used DJIA, FTSE 100 and S&P 500 data from 2007 to 2010 to build the Bayes model. The model was used to track the S&P 500 market from 2010 to 2012, which saw two spells of abnormal regimes, as identified by our previous work, with the benefit of hindsight. The tracking method presented in this paper, with either decision rule, managed to pick up both spells of regime changes accurately. The tracking signals could be useful to market participants. This study potentially lays the foundation of a practical financial early warning system.
应对市场中的制度变化
在我们之前的工作中,我们表明,市场的状态变化是可以通过历史数据的定向变化(DC)来追溯检测的。在本文中,我们以这些结果为基础,并表明DC指标可以用于市场跟踪-使用截至目前的数据-以了解市场中正在发生的事情。特别是,我们想跟踪市场,看看市场是否正在进入一个异常的波动机制。所提出的方法使用过去观察到的直流指标值来模拟市场的正常制度(其中波动性是正常的)或异常制度(其中波动性异常高)。给定当前市场中观察到的特定值,我们使用朴素贝叶斯模型独立计算两个概率:一个是市场处于正常状态,另一个是市场处于异常状态。将这两种可能性结合起来决定市场处于哪种制度,并研究了两种决策规则:简单规则和严格规则。我们使用2007 - 2010年的道琼斯指数、富时100指数和标准普尔500指数数据来构建贝叶斯模型。该模型被用于跟踪2010年至2012年的标准普尔500指数市场,正如我们之前的工作所发现的那样,该市场经历了两次异常机制。本文所提出的跟踪方法,无论采用哪一种决策规则,都能准确地捕捉到两种状态的变化。跟踪信号可能对市场参与者有用。本研究为建立实用的金融预警系统奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信