{"title":"The lexical decision task as a measure of L2 lexical proficiency","authors":"M. Harrington","doi":"10.1075/EUROSLA.6.10HAR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior applications of the lexical decision task in second language research have either examined performance accuracy (Meara and Buxton 1987) or speed of response to familiar items (Segalowitz and Segalowitz 1993). This paper examines how well the two measures together serve to discriminate among between-group levels of proficiency and within-group levels of difficulty on an English lexical decision task. Performance was compared across three levels of English proficiency (Intermediate L2, Advanced L2 and English L1 control) and four levels of item difficulty, as defined by frequency of occurrence (words from the 2000, 3000, 5000 and 10,000 most frequently occurring words). Accuracy and reaction time measures systematically decreased as a function of increasing proficiency and frequency level. Response variability, as measured by the coefficient of variance, also decreased as performance improved. The implications of the findings for the use of lexical decision tasks in second language research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":236084,"journal":{"name":"Eurosla Yearbook","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurosla Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/EUROSLA.6.10HAR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46
Abstract
Prior applications of the lexical decision task in second language research have either examined performance accuracy (Meara and Buxton 1987) or speed of response to familiar items (Segalowitz and Segalowitz 1993). This paper examines how well the two measures together serve to discriminate among between-group levels of proficiency and within-group levels of difficulty on an English lexical decision task. Performance was compared across three levels of English proficiency (Intermediate L2, Advanced L2 and English L1 control) and four levels of item difficulty, as defined by frequency of occurrence (words from the 2000, 3000, 5000 and 10,000 most frequently occurring words). Accuracy and reaction time measures systematically decreased as a function of increasing proficiency and frequency level. Response variability, as measured by the coefficient of variance, also decreased as performance improved. The implications of the findings for the use of lexical decision tasks in second language research are discussed.
先前词汇决策任务在第二语言研究中的应用要么检验了表现的准确性(Meara and Buxton 1987),要么检验了对熟悉项目的反应速度(Segalowitz and Segalowitz 1993)。本文考察了这两种测量方法在英语词汇决策任务的组间熟练程度和组内难度水平之间的区别。在三个英语水平水平(中级L2,高级L2和英语L1控制)和四个项目难度水平(根据出现频率(2000,3000,5000和10000个最常出现的单词)来定义)的表现进行比较。准确度和反应时间测量随着熟练程度和频率水平的提高而系统性地降低。通过方差系数测量的反应变异性也随着性能的提高而降低。研究结果对词汇决策任务在第二语言研究中的应用意义进行了讨论。