On the Detection Methods for Indoor Ultra Wideband Communications with Multiple User Interference

M. Mahfuz, K. Ahmed, R. Rajatheva
{"title":"On the Detection Methods for Indoor Ultra Wideband Communications with Multiple User Interference","authors":"M. Mahfuz, K. Ahmed, R. Rajatheva","doi":"10.1109/ICICS.2005.1689054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In high data rate indoor ultra wideband (UWB) communication systems, the selection of the appropriate detection method in the receiver is always an important problem. This paper compares the performances of two different detection methods, hard decision detection (HDD) and soft decision detection (SDD), for three different types of indoor UWB systems named time hopping pulse position modulation (TH-PPM), direct sequence bi-phase modulation (DS-BPM) and time hopping bi-phase modulation (TH-BPM) UWB indoor communication systems with multiple user interference (MUI). Using the recently accepted IEEE 802.15.3a UWB channel model, the three schemes were compared. Finally, it has been concluded that for both DS-BPM and TH-BPM systems, SDD outperforms HDD in terms of BER performance and so SDD should be chosen as the preferred detection scheme. However, in case of TH-PPM system, the system BER performance depends on the pulse repetition rate, any of SDD and HDD can be chosen as preferred detection scheme if one pulse per bit is used whereas for multiple pulses per bit SDD outperforms HDD significantly. Using SDD method, DS-BPM scheme can achieve the maximum SNR gain in presence of multiple user interference (MUI)","PeriodicalId":425178,"journal":{"name":"2005 5th International Conference on Information Communications & Signal Processing","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2005 5th International Conference on Information Communications & Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICS.2005.1689054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In high data rate indoor ultra wideband (UWB) communication systems, the selection of the appropriate detection method in the receiver is always an important problem. This paper compares the performances of two different detection methods, hard decision detection (HDD) and soft decision detection (SDD), for three different types of indoor UWB systems named time hopping pulse position modulation (TH-PPM), direct sequence bi-phase modulation (DS-BPM) and time hopping bi-phase modulation (TH-BPM) UWB indoor communication systems with multiple user interference (MUI). Using the recently accepted IEEE 802.15.3a UWB channel model, the three schemes were compared. Finally, it has been concluded that for both DS-BPM and TH-BPM systems, SDD outperforms HDD in terms of BER performance and so SDD should be chosen as the preferred detection scheme. However, in case of TH-PPM system, the system BER performance depends on the pulse repetition rate, any of SDD and HDD can be chosen as preferred detection scheme if one pulse per bit is used whereas for multiple pulses per bit SDD outperforms HDD significantly. Using SDD method, DS-BPM scheme can achieve the maximum SNR gain in presence of multiple user interference (MUI)
室内超宽带多用户干扰检测方法研究
在高数据速率的室内超宽带(UWB)通信系统中,选择合适的接收机检测方法一直是一个重要问题。针对多用户干扰(MUI)下的跳时脉冲位置调制(TH-PPM)、直接顺序双相位调制(DS-BPM)和跳时双相位调制(TH-BPM)三种不同类型的UWB室内通信系统,比较了硬决策检测(HDD)和软决策检测(SDD)两种不同检测方法的性能。采用IEEE 802.15.3a超宽带信道模型,对三种方案进行了比较。最后得出结论,对于DS-BPM和TH-BPM系统,SDD在误码率性能方面优于HDD,因此应选择SDD作为首选检测方案。然而,在TH-PPM系统中,系统的误码率性能取决于脉冲重复率,如果使用每比特一个脉冲,则可以选择SDD和HDD中的任何一个作为首选检测方案,而对于每比特多个脉冲,SDD的性能明显优于HDD。利用SDD方法,DS-BPM方案可以在多用户干扰(MUI)情况下实现最大信噪比增益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信