Memory and Oblivion in the History of Gonǧ Monastery (1670–1750):

Anaïs Wion
{"title":"Memory and Oblivion in the History of Gonǧ Monastery (1670–1750):","authors":"Anaïs Wion","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvcm4fb5.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the end of the 17th century, the history of Gonǧ monastery, in Goǧǧam, was complex and traumatic because its abbot, Ṭabdan Dǝngǝl, head of the qǝbat movement during Yoḥannǝs’ reign (1667-82), entered in rebellion against King Iyasu (1682-1706), who favored the Dabra Libanos monastic network and declared qǝbat a heresy. The civil war lasted until Ṭabdan and his followers were excommunicated and banished, in 1687. Nonetheless, a few decades later, Gonǧ was richly endowed by the royal power and its violent and rebellious past seemed forgotten. How did a rebellious institution come back to the foreground of the political and religious scene a few decades later? What had to be altered or forgotten in this violent history? How did written documents, oral history and iconographic sources, not to forget rites and the landscape, enter into this re-imagining of the past? The memory has been lost of Ṭabdan Dǝngǝl, the abbot of Gonǧ who sowed dissension within the qǝbat movement, opposed his own monks and led an up-rising against the king. New narratives, such as a dying bishop travelling miraculously to Gonǧ and the ‘late’ invention of a neutral founding father, help in attracting the faithful and pilgrims, and recalling the institution’s long history and close relations with major political and religious authorities. In this case study, oral history forges stories and portrays characters in ways that obstruct the exposal of the ‘historical truth’.","PeriodicalId":168398,"journal":{"name":"Oral Traditions in Ethiopian Studies","volume":"565 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Traditions in Ethiopian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4fb5.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the end of the 17th century, the history of Gonǧ monastery, in Goǧǧam, was complex and traumatic because its abbot, Ṭabdan Dǝngǝl, head of the qǝbat movement during Yoḥannǝs’ reign (1667-82), entered in rebellion against King Iyasu (1682-1706), who favored the Dabra Libanos monastic network and declared qǝbat a heresy. The civil war lasted until Ṭabdan and his followers were excommunicated and banished, in 1687. Nonetheless, a few decades later, Gonǧ was richly endowed by the royal power and its violent and rebellious past seemed forgotten. How did a rebellious institution come back to the foreground of the political and religious scene a few decades later? What had to be altered or forgotten in this violent history? How did written documents, oral history and iconographic sources, not to forget rites and the landscape, enter into this re-imagining of the past? The memory has been lost of Ṭabdan Dǝngǝl, the abbot of Gonǧ who sowed dissension within the qǝbat movement, opposed his own monks and led an up-rising against the king. New narratives, such as a dying bishop travelling miraculously to Gonǧ and the ‘late’ invention of a neutral founding father, help in attracting the faithful and pilgrims, and recalling the institution’s long history and close relations with major political and religious authorities. In this case study, oral history forges stories and portrays characters in ways that obstruct the exposal of the ‘historical truth’.
贡瑙修道院历史中的记忆与遗忘(1670-1750)
17世纪末,Goǧǧam的戈诺修道院的历史是复杂而痛苦的,因为它的住持Ṭabdan Dǝngǝl, Yoḥannǝs统治时期(1667-82年)qǝbat运动的领袖,加入了反对Iyasu国王(1682-1706年)的叛乱,后者支持Dabra Libanos修道院网络,并宣布qǝbat为异端。内战一直持续到Ṭabdan和他的追随者在1687年被逐出教会和流放。尽管如此,几十年后,戈瑙被皇室赋予了丰富的权力,它的暴力和反叛的过去似乎被遗忘了。一个反叛的机构是如何在几十年后重新回到政治和宗教舞台的前台的?在这段暴力的历史中,有什么必须被改变或遗忘?书面文件,口述历史和图像来源,不要忘记仪式和景观,是如何进入对过去的重新想象的?人们对Ṭabdan Dǝngǝl的记忆已经消失了,这位戈瑙修道院院长在qǝbat运动中播下了分歧,反对他自己的僧侣,并领导了一场反对国王的起义。新的叙述,如一个垂死的主教奇迹般地前往戈纳乌,以及一位中立的开国元勋的“晚期”发明,有助于吸引信徒和朝圣者,并回顾该机构的悠久历史以及与主要政治和宗教当局的密切关系。在这个案例研究中,口述历史以一种阻碍“历史真相”暴露的方式伪造故事和描绘人物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信