Postoperative Radiation Referral Rates for Metastatic Bone Disease Within the Veteran’s Health Administration and at an Academic Center

K. Gundle, Sarah M Hanna, Andrew R Summers, Travis C Philipp, Reid F Thompson, James B Hayden, Yee Cheen Doung
{"title":"Postoperative Radiation Referral Rates for Metastatic Bone Disease Within the Veteran’s Health Administration and at an Academic Center","authors":"K. Gundle, Sarah M Hanna, Andrew R Summers, Travis C Philipp, Reid F Thompson, James B Hayden, Yee Cheen Doung","doi":"10.31487/j.aco.2022.01.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: External beam radiation therapy is an important aspect of multidisciplinary care for patients with metastatic bone disease. Referral to radiation oncology is within the control of the orthopaedic surgeon and has the potential to serve as a quality benchmark. \nMethods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients with metastatic disease of the femur who underwent prophylactic femoral stabilization or fixation of a pathologic femur fracture from 2010-2015 at a single academic medical center or within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) were included. A total of 950 VHA patients and 130 academic medical center patients were enrolled. The main outcome was the proportion of patients receiving a referral to radiation oncology by six weeks after the date of surgery. Results are presented for each institution and are stratified by type of procedure (prophylactic stabilization versus pathologic fixation). The study further evaluates regional differences within the VHA.\nResults: The majority of patients received a referral for radiation after prophylactic stabilization (VHA: 290/361 patients [80% 95% CI: 76% - 84%]; academic medical center: 81/89 patients [91%, 95% CI: 85%, 97%]). The proportion referred was higher at the academic medical center (odds ratio [OR]: 2.5, 95% CI: [1.15, 5.36], P =0.027). After fracture fixation, 428/589 (73%, 95% CI: [69%, 77%]) of VHA patients and 30/41 (73%, 95% CI [59%, 87%]) of patients at the academic medical center received a referral to radiation. Receiving a referral was not associated with healthcare system (OR: 1.0; 95% CI: [0.50, 2.10])). Within the VHA, the proportion of patients referred varied by geographic location (Pearson’s chi-squared test, P =0.004 for prophylactic stabilization and P <0.001 for pathologic fixation). \nConclusion: Referral rates at both institutions were moderate to high. The observed regional variation within the VHA highlights the importance of establishing quality benchmarks.","PeriodicalId":320563,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Oncology","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.aco.2022.01.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: External beam radiation therapy is an important aspect of multidisciplinary care for patients with metastatic bone disease. Referral to radiation oncology is within the control of the orthopaedic surgeon and has the potential to serve as a quality benchmark. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients with metastatic disease of the femur who underwent prophylactic femoral stabilization or fixation of a pathologic femur fracture from 2010-2015 at a single academic medical center or within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) were included. A total of 950 VHA patients and 130 academic medical center patients were enrolled. The main outcome was the proportion of patients receiving a referral to radiation oncology by six weeks after the date of surgery. Results are presented for each institution and are stratified by type of procedure (prophylactic stabilization versus pathologic fixation). The study further evaluates regional differences within the VHA. Results: The majority of patients received a referral for radiation after prophylactic stabilization (VHA: 290/361 patients [80% 95% CI: 76% - 84%]; academic medical center: 81/89 patients [91%, 95% CI: 85%, 97%]). The proportion referred was higher at the academic medical center (odds ratio [OR]: 2.5, 95% CI: [1.15, 5.36], P =0.027). After fracture fixation, 428/589 (73%, 95% CI: [69%, 77%]) of VHA patients and 30/41 (73%, 95% CI [59%, 87%]) of patients at the academic medical center received a referral to radiation. Receiving a referral was not associated with healthcare system (OR: 1.0; 95% CI: [0.50, 2.10])). Within the VHA, the proportion of patients referred varied by geographic location (Pearson’s chi-squared test, P =0.004 for prophylactic stabilization and P <0.001 for pathologic fixation). Conclusion: Referral rates at both institutions were moderate to high. The observed regional variation within the VHA highlights the importance of establishing quality benchmarks.
退伍军人健康管理局和一个学术中心的转移性骨病术后放射转诊率
背景:外束放射治疗是转移性骨病患者多学科治疗的一个重要方面。转诊到放射肿瘤学是在骨科医生的控制范围内,并有可能作为一个质量基准。方法:回顾性队列研究。纳入2010-2015年在单一学术医疗中心或退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)内接受预防性股骨稳定或病理性股骨骨折固定治疗的股骨转移性疾病患者。共有950名VHA患者和130名学术医疗中心患者入组。主要结果是在手术后6周内接受转诊到放射肿瘤学的患者比例。结果呈现在每个机构,并按手术类型(预防性稳定与病理性固定)进行分层。该研究进一步评估了VHA内部的区域差异。结果:大多数患者在预防性稳定后接受了放射治疗(VHA: 290/361例患者[80% 95% CI: 76% - 84%];学术医疗中心:81/89例患者[91%,95% CI: 85%, 97%])。在学术医疗中心的转诊比例更高(优势比[OR]: 2.5, 95% CI: [1.15, 5.36], P =0.027)。骨折固定后,428/589 (73%,95% CI:[69%, 77%])的VHA患者和30/41 (73%,95% CI[59%, 87%])的学术医疗中心患者转诊到放射治疗。接受转诊与医疗保健系统无关(OR: 1.0;95% ci:[0.50, 2.10])。在VHA内,患者的比例因地理位置而异(Pearson卡方检验,预防性稳定P =0.004,病理固定P <0.001)。结论:两所医院的转诊率均为中高。VHA内部观察到的区域差异突出了建立质量基准的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信