User Expectations of Facial Recognition in Schools and Universities: Mixed Methods Analysis

A. Roundtree
{"title":"User Expectations of Facial Recognition in Schools and Universities: Mixed Methods Analysis","authors":"A. Roundtree","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This project explores the relationship between community perception, expectations, and experiences with privacy risk and facial recognition technology used in schools and universities. The methodology includes a meta-analysis of current literature and content analysis of social media content on the subject matter. The meta-analysis revealed that positive attitudes about facial recognition technology used in schools only reflect a portion of the total surveyed. A sentiment analysis of tweets about facial recognition technology used in schools and universities revealed that concerns skyrocketed in 2020, probably caused by the pandemic forcing courses and academic activity online, thereby heightening awareness about facial recognition technology and its implications. Tweets expressed concern about privacy, ethics, and data management. Negative emotion spiked in discussions about unrest and conflicts, possibly due to news about facial recognition used in crowd control. Concerns about power differentials spiked in conversations about how facial recognition would affect academics and education. The trends in attitudes directly pertain to current and projected problems and negative implications of facial recognition on vulnerable populations, including children, seniors, ethnic minorities, and transgender populations. The heterogeneity of the U.S. market requires sensitivity to issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Recommendations include operationalizing lessons learned from user experience research. Future studies should investigate trade-offs between privacy, safety, and autonomy.","PeriodicalId":409565,"journal":{"name":"Usability and User Experience","volume":"29 21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Usability and User Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This project explores the relationship between community perception, expectations, and experiences with privacy risk and facial recognition technology used in schools and universities. The methodology includes a meta-analysis of current literature and content analysis of social media content on the subject matter. The meta-analysis revealed that positive attitudes about facial recognition technology used in schools only reflect a portion of the total surveyed. A sentiment analysis of tweets about facial recognition technology used in schools and universities revealed that concerns skyrocketed in 2020, probably caused by the pandemic forcing courses and academic activity online, thereby heightening awareness about facial recognition technology and its implications. Tweets expressed concern about privacy, ethics, and data management. Negative emotion spiked in discussions about unrest and conflicts, possibly due to news about facial recognition used in crowd control. Concerns about power differentials spiked in conversations about how facial recognition would affect academics and education. The trends in attitudes directly pertain to current and projected problems and negative implications of facial recognition on vulnerable populations, including children, seniors, ethnic minorities, and transgender populations. The heterogeneity of the U.S. market requires sensitivity to issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Recommendations include operationalizing lessons learned from user experience research. Future studies should investigate trade-offs between privacy, safety, and autonomy.
高校用户对人脸识别的期望:混合方法分析
该项目探讨了社区感知、期望和经验与隐私风险和在学校和大学使用的面部识别技术之间的关系。该方法包括对当前文献的荟萃分析和对主题的社交媒体内容的内容分析。荟萃分析显示,对学校使用的面部识别技术持积极态度的人只占被调查总数的一部分。一项对中小学和大学中使用的面部识别技术的推文进行的情绪分析显示,2020年人们对面部识别技术的担忧激增,这可能是由于疫情迫使课程和学术活动在网上进行,从而提高了人们对面部识别技术及其影响的认识。推文表达了对隐私、道德和数据管理的担忧。在有关骚乱和冲突的讨论中,负面情绪飙升,这可能是由于有关面部识别用于人群控制的新闻。在关于面部识别将如何影响学术和教育的对话中,对权力差异的担忧加剧。这种态度的趋势直接关系到当前和未来的问题以及面部识别对弱势群体的负面影响,包括儿童、老年人、少数民族和跨性别人群。美国市场的异质性要求对多样性、公平和包容等问题保持敏感。建议包括将从用户体验研究中吸取的经验教训付诸实施。未来的研究应该调查隐私、安全和自主之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信