How Much White-Space Capacity Is There?

Kate Harrison, S. M. Mishra, A. Sahai
{"title":"How Much White-Space Capacity Is There?","authors":"Kate Harrison, S. M. Mishra, A. Sahai","doi":"10.1109/DYSPAN.2010.5457914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Nov 2008 FCC ruling allowing access to the television whitespaces prompts a natural question. What is the magnitude and geographic distribution of the opportunity that has been opened up? This paper takes a semi-empirical perspective and uses the FCC's database of television transmitters, USA~census data from 2000, and standard wireless propagation and information-theoretic capacity models to see the distribution of {\\bf data-rates available on a per-person basis} for wireless Internet access across the continental USA. To get a realistic evaluation of the potential public benefit, we need to examine more than just how many whitespace channels have been made available. It is also important to consider the wireless ``pollution'' from existing television stations, the self-interference among whitespace devices themselves, the population distribution, and the expected transmission range of the whitespace devices. The clear advantage of the whitespace approach is revealed through a direct comparison of the Pareto frontier of the new white-space approach and that corresponding to the traditional approach of refarming bands between television and wireless data service. Finally, the critical importance of economic investment considerations is shown by considering the status of rural vs urban areas. Based on technical considerations alone, whether we consider long or short-range whitespace systems, people in rural areas would seem to be the main beneficiaries of white-space systems. In fact, a power-law distribution is found that suggests that many rural customers would enjoy tremendous data-rates. However, the fundamental need to recover investments by wireless ISPs couples the range to the population density. This clips the tail of the power-law and shows that urban areas actually get significant benefit from the TV whitespaces. Overall, the opportunity provided by TV whitespaces is shown to be potentially of the same order as the recent release of ``beachfront'' 700MHz spectrum for wireless data service.","PeriodicalId":106204,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum (DySPAN)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"222","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum (DySPAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DYSPAN.2010.5457914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 222

Abstract

The Nov 2008 FCC ruling allowing access to the television whitespaces prompts a natural question. What is the magnitude and geographic distribution of the opportunity that has been opened up? This paper takes a semi-empirical perspective and uses the FCC's database of television transmitters, USA~census data from 2000, and standard wireless propagation and information-theoretic capacity models to see the distribution of {\bf data-rates available on a per-person basis} for wireless Internet access across the continental USA. To get a realistic evaluation of the potential public benefit, we need to examine more than just how many whitespace channels have been made available. It is also important to consider the wireless ``pollution'' from existing television stations, the self-interference among whitespace devices themselves, the population distribution, and the expected transmission range of the whitespace devices. The clear advantage of the whitespace approach is revealed through a direct comparison of the Pareto frontier of the new white-space approach and that corresponding to the traditional approach of refarming bands between television and wireless data service. Finally, the critical importance of economic investment considerations is shown by considering the status of rural vs urban areas. Based on technical considerations alone, whether we consider long or short-range whitespace systems, people in rural areas would seem to be the main beneficiaries of white-space systems. In fact, a power-law distribution is found that suggests that many rural customers would enjoy tremendous data-rates. However, the fundamental need to recover investments by wireless ISPs couples the range to the population density. This clips the tail of the power-law and shows that urban areas actually get significant benefit from the TV whitespaces. Overall, the opportunity provided by TV whitespaces is shown to be potentially of the same order as the recent release of ``beachfront'' 700MHz spectrum for wireless data service.
有多少空白空间容量?
2008年11月美国联邦通信委员会(FCC)允许进入电视空白区域的裁决引发了一个自然的问题。已经打开的机会的规模和地理分布如何?本文采用半经验的观点,并使用FCC的电视发射机数据库、2000年以来的美国人口普查数据、标准无线传播和信息论容量模型来观察美国大陆无线互联网接入的分布情况。为了对潜在的公共利益进行现实的评估,我们需要检查的不仅仅是可用的空白通道的数量。还要考虑现有电视台的无线“污染”、空白设备本身的自干扰、人口分布以及空白设备的预期传输范围。通过直接比较新空白方法的帕累托边界和相应的传统方法在电视和无线数据服务之间重新分配频段,揭示了空白方法的明显优势。最后,经济投资考虑的关键重要性是通过考虑农村与城市地区的状况来显示的。仅基于技术考虑,无论我们考虑长距离还是短程空白系统,农村地区的人们似乎都是空白系统的主要受益者。事实上,幂律分布表明,许多农村用户将享受巨大的数据速率。然而,无线互联网服务提供商收回投资的基本需求与人口密度有关。这切断了幂律的尾部,表明城市地区实际上从电视空白区获得了显著的好处。总的来说,电视空白空间提供的机会与最近发布的用于无线数据服务的“海滨”700MHz频谱具有相同的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信