Coinductive Proof Search for Polarized Logic with Applications to Full Intuitionistic Propositional Logic

J. E. Santo, R. Matthes, L. Pinto
{"title":"Coinductive Proof Search for Polarized Logic with Applications to Full Intuitionistic Propositional Logic","authors":"J. E. Santo, R. Matthes, L. Pinto","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2020.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The approach to proof search dubbed\"coinductive proof search\", and previously developed by the authors for implicational intuitionistic logic, is in this paper extended to LJP, a focused sequent-calculus presentation of polarized intuitionistic logic, including an array of positive and negative connectives. As before, this includes developing a coinductive description of the search space generated by a sequent, an equivalent inductive syntax describing the same space, and decision procedures for inhabitation problems in the form of predicates defined by recursion on the inductive syntax. We prove the decidability of existence of focused inhabitants, and of finiteness of the number of focused inhabitants for polarized intuitionistic logic, by means of such recursive procedures. Moreover, the polarized logic can be used as a platform from which proof search for other logics is understood. We illustrate the technique with LJT, a focused sequent calculus for full intuitionistic propositional logic (including disjunction). For that, we have to work out the\"negative translation\"of LJT into LJP (that sees all intuitionistic types as negative types), and verify that the translation gives a faithful representation of proof search in LJT as proof search in the polarized logic. We therefore inherit decidability of both problems studied for LJP and thus get new proofs of these results for LJT.","PeriodicalId":131421,"journal":{"name":"Types for Proofs and Programs","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Types for Proofs and Programs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2020.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The approach to proof search dubbed"coinductive proof search", and previously developed by the authors for implicational intuitionistic logic, is in this paper extended to LJP, a focused sequent-calculus presentation of polarized intuitionistic logic, including an array of positive and negative connectives. As before, this includes developing a coinductive description of the search space generated by a sequent, an equivalent inductive syntax describing the same space, and decision procedures for inhabitation problems in the form of predicates defined by recursion on the inductive syntax. We prove the decidability of existence of focused inhabitants, and of finiteness of the number of focused inhabitants for polarized intuitionistic logic, by means of such recursive procedures. Moreover, the polarized logic can be used as a platform from which proof search for other logics is understood. We illustrate the technique with LJT, a focused sequent calculus for full intuitionistic propositional logic (including disjunction). For that, we have to work out the"negative translation"of LJT into LJP (that sees all intuitionistic types as negative types), and verify that the translation gives a faithful representation of proof search in LJT as proof search in the polarized logic. We therefore inherit decidability of both problems studied for LJP and thus get new proofs of these results for LJT.
极化逻辑的共归纳证明搜索及其在完全直觉命题逻辑中的应用
被称为“共归纳证明搜索”的证明搜索方法,先前由作者为隐含直觉逻辑开发,本文将其扩展到LJP,这是极化直觉逻辑的一个集中的序列演算表示,包括一组正连接词和负连接词。与前面一样,这包括开发由序列生成的搜索空间的共归纳描述、描述相同空间的等效归纳语法,以及在归纳语法上以递归定义的谓词形式定义居住问题的决策过程。利用这种递归过程,证明了极化直觉逻辑的焦点居民存在的可判定性和焦点居民数目的有限性。此外,极化逻辑可以作为理解其他逻辑的证明搜索的平台。我们用LJT来说明这种技术,LJT是一种专注于全直觉命题逻辑(包括析取)的序列演算。为此,我们必须将LJT的“否定翻译”为LJP(将所有直觉主义类型视为否定类型),并验证该翻译将LJT中的证明搜索忠实地表示为极化逻辑中的证明搜索。因此,我们继承了LJP研究的两个问题的可决性,从而对LJT的这些结果进行了新的证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信