A Campus-wide Survey of Consciousness on Research Datasets

T. Iyemori, Takaaki Aoki, S. Kajita, Tamaki Motoki, Tomoko Kawaguchi, E. Amano
{"title":"A Campus-wide Survey of Consciousness on Research Datasets","authors":"T. Iyemori, Takaaki Aoki, S. Kajita, Tamaki Motoki, Tomoko Kawaguchi, E. Amano","doi":"10.1109/IIAI-AAI50415.2020.00070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To obtain the basic information necessary for planning a research data management (RDM) system in Kyoto University, Japan, we conducted a campus-wide survey of research datasets twice with different topics. Although only a part of campus members responded, some clear tendencies were observed. That is, (1) considerable portion of researchers are not very positive to make their data open because of a confidentiality obligation or for holding their predominance in their research fields, (2) strength of consciousness on open data is considerably different depending on their discipline, (3) the above difference may come not only from inherency of each discipline but also from the requirement of open data by the journals. (4) There exist more than fifty open data repositories, and more than half of them are managed by the institutions established for each specific field of research or by the organization outside of the campus. From the survey, it is suggested that the researchers are still conservative to make their data open, and a current practical necessity to RDM system in the campus seems to be a system for keeping and making the data open within each research group. By preparing a convenient RDM system as well as the requirement of open data by the journals in wider discipline may change the consciousness of the researchers on open data.","PeriodicalId":188870,"journal":{"name":"2020 9th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 9th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI50415.2020.00070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To obtain the basic information necessary for planning a research data management (RDM) system in Kyoto University, Japan, we conducted a campus-wide survey of research datasets twice with different topics. Although only a part of campus members responded, some clear tendencies were observed. That is, (1) considerable portion of researchers are not very positive to make their data open because of a confidentiality obligation or for holding their predominance in their research fields, (2) strength of consciousness on open data is considerably different depending on their discipline, (3) the above difference may come not only from inherency of each discipline but also from the requirement of open data by the journals. (4) There exist more than fifty open data repositories, and more than half of them are managed by the institutions established for each specific field of research or by the organization outside of the campus. From the survey, it is suggested that the researchers are still conservative to make their data open, and a current practical necessity to RDM system in the campus seems to be a system for keeping and making the data open within each research group. By preparing a convenient RDM system as well as the requirement of open data by the journals in wider discipline may change the consciousness of the researchers on open data.
研究数据集意识的校园范围调查
为了获得规划研究数据管理(RDM)系统所需的基本信息,我们在日本京都大学对不同主题的研究数据集进行了两次全校范围的调查。虽然只有一部分校园成员做出了回应,但我们还是观察到了一些明显的趋势。即:(1)相当一部分研究人员出于保密义务或为了保持其在研究领域的优势地位,对开放数据的态度不是很积极;(2)不同学科对开放数据的意识强度存在较大差异;(3)上述差异可能不仅来自各学科的内在,也来自期刊对开放数据的要求。(4)现有50多个开放数据存储库,其中一半以上由为每个特定研究领域建立的机构或校园外的组织管理。从调查中可以看出,研究人员对数据开放的态度仍然比较保守,目前校园RDM系统的实际需要似乎是在每个研究小组内部保持和开放数据。通过建立一个便捷的RDM系统,以及更广泛学科期刊对开放数据的要求,可以改变研究人员对开放数据的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信