Viewpoint of Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Artificial Enabled Social Engineering Attacks

Nik Zulkarnaen Bin Khidzir, Shekh Abdullah-Al-Musa Ahmed
{"title":"Viewpoint of Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Artificial Enabled Social Engineering Attacks","authors":"Nik Zulkarnaen Bin Khidzir, Shekh Abdullah-Al-Musa Ahmed","doi":"10.37134/JCIT.VOL9.2.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk assessment really a complex decision-making process in the domain of in-formation security areas. There are a lot of unclear model of software domain and the lack of associated uncertainty are two main reasons that directly affect individual decisions making regarding risk assessment. When artificial enabled social engineering attacks are effectively may happening in every levels of domain. On the other hand, the risk assessment conducted on the safety requirements on artificial enabled social engineering attacks. So the simple meaning of social engineering is to refers to the psychologically and mentality use people to give secret information in the context of information security. A strategy of self-confidence for information collection, fraud, or access to the system, is different from a traditional \"con\" that it is often one of the more complex fraudulent schemes. That is why in this paper  we proposed theoretical framework, which can not only demonstrate its potential for the risk assessment, but it can be sensitive and effective in analyzing a critical and uncertain operational environment that can address the extreme effects of information security.","PeriodicalId":275871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37134/JCIT.VOL9.2.2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Risk assessment really a complex decision-making process in the domain of in-formation security areas. There are a lot of unclear model of software domain and the lack of associated uncertainty are two main reasons that directly affect individual decisions making regarding risk assessment. When artificial enabled social engineering attacks are effectively may happening in every levels of domain. On the other hand, the risk assessment conducted on the safety requirements on artificial enabled social engineering attacks. So the simple meaning of social engineering is to refers to the psychologically and mentality use people to give secret information in the context of information security. A strategy of self-confidence for information collection, fraud, or access to the system, is different from a traditional "con" that it is often one of the more complex fraudulent schemes. That is why in this paper  we proposed theoretical framework, which can not only demonstrate its potential for the risk assessment, but it can be sensitive and effective in analyzing a critical and uncertain operational environment that can address the extreme effects of information security.
人工社会工程攻击的概率风险评估观点
在信息安全领域,风险评估是一个复杂的决策过程。软件领域中存在大量不明确的模型和缺乏相关的不确定性是直接影响个体风险评估决策的两个主要原因。当人为启用的社会工程攻击有效地发生时,可能发生在各个层次的领域。另一方面,对人工启用的社会工程攻击的安全需求进行风险评估。所以社会工程的简单含义是指在信息安全的背景下,利用人们的心理和心态给予保密信息。信息收集、欺诈或进入系统的自信策略与传统的“骗局”不同,它通常是更复杂的欺诈计划之一。这就是为什么在本文中我们提出的理论框架,它不仅可以证明其潜在的风险评估,但它可以是敏感和有效的分析一个关键的和不确定的操作环境,可以解决信息安全的极端影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信