Endogenous and Exogenous Effects on a Driving-Simulation Task

J. Vilchez
{"title":"Endogenous and Exogenous Effects on a Driving-Simulation Task","authors":"J. Vilchez","doi":"10.17791/jcs.2019.20.4.505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work tests the effect of attentional distractors on participants'' path movement. This influence on movement was measured, in a series of three experiments, both as an involuntary deviations in the trajectory in a tracking task and as the probability of taking the left/right-branch in a Y-junction of a simulated road. The effects found in previous works have shown relevant implications for road safety. None of previous theoretical models are able to account for most of present and those previous results. Three different attentional cues were used to test if the path movement of University students was influenced. Endogenous and exogenous attentional cues were used in a series of the three experiment. Data show the key role of both the meaning per se of cues and the context--in which these cues are presented--in determining the kind of effect on movement. The most relevant result is that participants approach to the location in which traffic signs were presented. In this sense, I discuss the relevance of the results from a cognitive-ergonomic point of view. Regarding its theoretical contribution, findings support recently-proposed accounts for the relationship between attention and movement (MDRA model).","PeriodicalId":135438,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Cognitive Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2019.20.4.505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The present work tests the effect of attentional distractors on participants'' path movement. This influence on movement was measured, in a series of three experiments, both as an involuntary deviations in the trajectory in a tracking task and as the probability of taking the left/right-branch in a Y-junction of a simulated road. The effects found in previous works have shown relevant implications for road safety. None of previous theoretical models are able to account for most of present and those previous results. Three different attentional cues were used to test if the path movement of University students was influenced. Endogenous and exogenous attentional cues were used in a series of the three experiment. Data show the key role of both the meaning per se of cues and the context--in which these cues are presented--in determining the kind of effect on movement. The most relevant result is that participants approach to the location in which traffic signs were presented. In this sense, I discuss the relevance of the results from a cognitive-ergonomic point of view. Regarding its theoretical contribution, findings support recently-proposed accounts for the relationship between attention and movement (MDRA model).
驾驶模拟任务的内源性和外源性效应
本研究测试了注意干扰物对被试路径运动的影响。在一系列的三个实验中,这种对运动的影响被测量出来,作为跟踪任务中轨迹的非自愿偏差,以及在模拟道路的y形路口采取左/右分支的概率。在以前的研究中发现的影响已经显示了对道路安全的相关影响。以前的理论模型都不能解释现在和以前的大部分结果。采用三种不同的注意线索来测试大学生的路径运动是否受到影响。在三个实验中分别使用了内源性和外源性注意线索。数据显示,提示本身的含义和提示所处的环境在决定对动作的影响方面都起着关键作用。最相关的结果是参与者接近交通标志出现的位置。在这个意义上,我从认知人体工程学的角度讨论结果的相关性。关于其理论贡献,研究结果支持最近提出的注意和运动之间关系的解释(MDRA模型)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信