1× Reflective X-Ray Optics

R. Pease, N. Maluf, D. Markle, G. Owen
{"title":"1× Reflective X-Ray Optics","authors":"R. Pease, N. Maluf, D. Markle, G. Owen","doi":"10.1364/sxray.1992.tua6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using soft X-rays with a wavelength of 13 nm, a diffraction limited projection system with an NA of about 0.09 would have a resolution of about 0.1 μm. The corresponding Rayleigh depth of focus would be about 1.6 μm. Several catoptric reduction designs for use in this regime have been proposed, but they are limited to very small field sizes, because of the difficulty of controlling geometric aberrations. In addition, central obscuration in some designs (e.g. the Schwarzschild), further reduces image modulation. The use of aspheric mirrors can improve the performance, but the figuring and in particular testing of such surfaces at these wavelengths are major challenges. In addition, the alignment of such an aspheric system is a far from trivial undertaking. An alternative approach is to adopt a unit magnification optical system, and make use of the inherent freedom from aberrations such a configuration can posess. Such an approach, using the Offner ring field design, has been proposed by Wood et al [1]. An objection that is often raised to 1× lithography in general is the perceived difficulty of making masks. It is shown that the assumptions customarily made to extrapolate 5× mask specifications down to the 1× level are fallacious. In particular, evidence is presented that error distributions do not, as is commonly assumed, lie on a Gaussian. Even more importantly, the errors are not distributed evenly over the mask: it is shown how this fact, in particular, greatly eases the supposed difficulty of making 1× masks.","PeriodicalId":409291,"journal":{"name":"Soft-X-Ray Projection Lithography","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soft-X-Ray Projection Lithography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/sxray.1992.tua6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using soft X-rays with a wavelength of 13 nm, a diffraction limited projection system with an NA of about 0.09 would have a resolution of about 0.1 μm. The corresponding Rayleigh depth of focus would be about 1.6 μm. Several catoptric reduction designs for use in this regime have been proposed, but they are limited to very small field sizes, because of the difficulty of controlling geometric aberrations. In addition, central obscuration in some designs (e.g. the Schwarzschild), further reduces image modulation. The use of aspheric mirrors can improve the performance, but the figuring and in particular testing of such surfaces at these wavelengths are major challenges. In addition, the alignment of such an aspheric system is a far from trivial undertaking. An alternative approach is to adopt a unit magnification optical system, and make use of the inherent freedom from aberrations such a configuration can posess. Such an approach, using the Offner ring field design, has been proposed by Wood et al [1]. An objection that is often raised to 1× lithography in general is the perceived difficulty of making masks. It is shown that the assumptions customarily made to extrapolate 5× mask specifications down to the 1× level are fallacious. In particular, evidence is presented that error distributions do not, as is commonly assumed, lie on a Gaussian. Even more importantly, the errors are not distributed evenly over the mask: it is shown how this fact, in particular, greatly eases the supposed difficulty of making 1× masks.
1×反射x射线光学
使用波长为13 nm的软x射线,NA约为0.09的衍射限制投影系统的分辨率约为0.1 μm。相应的瑞利聚焦深度约为1.6 μm。已经提出了几种用于这种情况的反射减少设计,但由于难以控制几何像差,它们仅限于非常小的场尺寸。此外,中心遮挡在一些设计(如史瓦西),进一步减少图像调制。使用非球面反射镜可以提高性能,但在这些波长下对这些表面的计算和特别是测试是主要的挑战。此外,这种非球面系统的对准是一项远非微不足道的工作。另一种方法是采用单位倍率光学系统,并利用这种配置可以拥有的固有的免于像差的自由。Wood等人[1]利用Offner环场设计提出了这种方法。通常对1x光刻提出的反对意见是制作面具的难度。结果表明,通常将5x掩模规格外推到1x水平的假设是错误的。特别是,有证据表明,误差分布并不像通常假设的那样是高斯分布。更重要的是,误差并没有均匀地分布在掩模上:它显示了这个事实,特别是如何极大地减轻了制作1x掩模的假定困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信