Towards Prospective Sustainability Life Cycle Assessment

Abigail R. Clarke-Sather, Saleh Mamun, D. Nolan, P. Schoff, M. Aro, Bridget A. Ulrich
{"title":"Towards Prospective Sustainability Life Cycle Assessment","authors":"Abigail R. Clarke-Sather, Saleh Mamun, D. Nolan, P. Schoff, M. Aro, Bridget A. Ulrich","doi":"10.1115/detc2020-22526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a well-established tool for measuring environmental effects of existing technology. While the most recent LCA research has focused on environmental impacts, in particular on the effects of climate change, there is growing interest in how LCA can be used prospectively. A 2019 workshop in Duluth, Minnesota sought to define the needs and priorities of prospective life cycle assessment from a perspective that considers diverse viewpoints. In that workshop, participants outlined frameworks for how sustainability impacts might figure into a prospective LCA tool focused on assessing technologies currently under development. Those frameworks included social and economic impacts, which were characterized alongside environmental impacts, with the goal of predicting potential impacts and developing recommendations for improving technologies. Cultural perspective, in particular the roots of the German circular economy, was explored and held up as a reminder that different communities are influenced by different sustainability concerns, leading to diverse policy and cultural prerogatives. The purpose of this paper is to catalyze conversation about how to frame methodologies of existing LCA tools that could be used in a prospective sustainability context.","PeriodicalId":131252,"journal":{"name":"Volume 6: 25th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 6: 25th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2020-22526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a well-established tool for measuring environmental effects of existing technology. While the most recent LCA research has focused on environmental impacts, in particular on the effects of climate change, there is growing interest in how LCA can be used prospectively. A 2019 workshop in Duluth, Minnesota sought to define the needs and priorities of prospective life cycle assessment from a perspective that considers diverse viewpoints. In that workshop, participants outlined frameworks for how sustainability impacts might figure into a prospective LCA tool focused on assessing technologies currently under development. Those frameworks included social and economic impacts, which were characterized alongside environmental impacts, with the goal of predicting potential impacts and developing recommendations for improving technologies. Cultural perspective, in particular the roots of the German circular economy, was explored and held up as a reminder that different communities are influenced by different sustainability concerns, leading to diverse policy and cultural prerogatives. The purpose of this paper is to catalyze conversation about how to frame methodologies of existing LCA tools that could be used in a prospective sustainability context.
迈向前瞻性可持续发展生命周期评估
生命周期评价(LCA)是衡量现有技术对环境影响的一种行之有效的工具。虽然最近的LCA研究主要集中在环境影响,特别是气候变化的影响上,但人们对如何利用LCA的前景越来越感兴趣。2019年在明尼苏达州德卢斯举行的一次研讨会试图从考虑不同观点的角度来定义预期生命周期评估的需求和优先事项。在该讲习班上,与会者概述了如何将可持续性影响纳入侧重于评估目前正在开发的技术的预期生命周期分析工具的框架。这些框架包括社会和经济影响,其特点是与环境影响一起,其目标是预测潜在影响和制定改进技术的建议。文化视角,特别是德国循环经济的根源,被探讨并提醒人们,不同的社区受到不同的可持续性问题的影响,从而导致不同的政策和文化特权。本文的目的是促进关于如何在未来可持续性背景下使用现有LCA工具的框架方法的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信