Virginia Woolf and Aldous Huxley in Good Housekeeping Magazine

Saskia McCracken
{"title":"Virginia Woolf and Aldous Huxley in Good Housekeeping Magazine","authors":"Saskia McCracken","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474461085.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1931, Virginia Woolf was commissioned to write a series of six articles for Good Housekeeping, a middlebrow women’s magazine, which have typically been read by critics as five essays and a short story. Woolf’s series takes her readers on a tour of the sites of commerce and power in London, from the Thames docks and shops of Oxford Street, to ‘Great Men’s Houses,’ abbeys, cathedrals, and the House of Commons, ending with a ‘Portrait’ of a fictitious Londoner. This chapter has three aims. First, it suggests that Woolf’s Good Housekeeping publications can be read not simply as five essays and a short story, but, considering Woolf’s ethics of the short story, as a series of short stories or, as the magazine editors introduced them, word pictures and scenes. Secondly, this chapter argues that Woolf’s Good Housekeeping series responds to, and resists the Stalinist politics of, Aldous Huxley’s series of four highbrow essays on England, published in Nash’s Pall Mall Magazine. Finally, this chapter analyses a critically neglected short story by Ambrose O’Neill, ‘The Astounding History of Albert Orange’ (February 1932), published in Good Housekeeping, which features both Woolf and Huxley as characters, and which critiques, satirises, and destabilises the boundaries of highbrow literary culture. Thus, the focus turns from highbrow writers’ short stories to a story about highbrow writing, all published in the supposedly middlebrow Good Housekeeping, demonstrating the rich complexity of the magazine, its varied politics, and its generically hybrid publications.","PeriodicalId":427766,"journal":{"name":"The Modern Short Story and Magazine Culture, 1880-1950","volume":"199 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Modern Short Story and Magazine Culture, 1880-1950","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474461085.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 1931, Virginia Woolf was commissioned to write a series of six articles for Good Housekeeping, a middlebrow women’s magazine, which have typically been read by critics as five essays and a short story. Woolf’s series takes her readers on a tour of the sites of commerce and power in London, from the Thames docks and shops of Oxford Street, to ‘Great Men’s Houses,’ abbeys, cathedrals, and the House of Commons, ending with a ‘Portrait’ of a fictitious Londoner. This chapter has three aims. First, it suggests that Woolf’s Good Housekeeping publications can be read not simply as five essays and a short story, but, considering Woolf’s ethics of the short story, as a series of short stories or, as the magazine editors introduced them, word pictures and scenes. Secondly, this chapter argues that Woolf’s Good Housekeeping series responds to, and resists the Stalinist politics of, Aldous Huxley’s series of four highbrow essays on England, published in Nash’s Pall Mall Magazine. Finally, this chapter analyses a critically neglected short story by Ambrose O’Neill, ‘The Astounding History of Albert Orange’ (February 1932), published in Good Housekeeping, which features both Woolf and Huxley as characters, and which critiques, satirises, and destabilises the boundaries of highbrow literary culture. Thus, the focus turns from highbrow writers’ short stories to a story about highbrow writing, all published in the supposedly middlebrow Good Housekeeping, demonstrating the rich complexity of the magazine, its varied politics, and its generically hybrid publications.
弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫和奥多斯·赫胥黎在《好管家》杂志上的照片
1931年,弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫受委托为一本名为《好管家》(Good Housekeeping)的中层女性杂志撰写六篇系列文章,通常被评论家视为五篇随笔和一篇短篇小说。伍尔夫的系列小说带领读者参观了伦敦的商业和权力场所,从泰晤士码头和牛津街的商店,到“伟人之家”、修道院、大教堂和下议院,最后以一个虚构的伦敦人的“肖像”结尾。本章有三个目的。首先,它表明伍尔夫的《好管家》出版物不能简单地作为五篇文章和一个短篇小说来阅读,而是,考虑到伍尔夫对短篇小说的伦理,作为一系列短篇小说,或者像杂志编辑介绍的那样,作为文字图片和场景。其次,本章认为伍尔夫的《好管家》系列回应并抵制了阿道斯·赫胥黎在纳什的《颇尔美尔杂志》上发表的四篇关于英国的高深文章系列的斯大林主义政治。最后,本章分析了安布罗斯·奥尼尔在《好管家》杂志上发表的一篇被评论界忽视的短篇小说《阿尔伯特·奥兰治的惊人历史》(1932年2月),该小说以伍尔夫和赫胥黎为角色,对高雅文学文化的界限进行了批评、讽刺和破坏。因此,焦点从高雅作家的短篇小说转向了高雅写作的故事,所有这些故事都发表在所谓的中等格调的《好管家》杂志上,展示了该杂志的丰富复杂性,其多样化的政治,以及它通常混合的出版物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信