Comparing Requirements Analysis Techniques in Business Intelligence and Transactional Contexts: A Qualitative Exploratory Study

M. G. Guillemette, Sylvie Frechette, Alexandre Moïse
{"title":"Comparing Requirements Analysis Techniques in Business Intelligence and Transactional Contexts: A Qualitative Exploratory Study","authors":"M. G. Guillemette, Sylvie Frechette, Alexandre Moïse","doi":"10.4018/ijbir.294569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Requirements elicitation is a key concern in information technology (IT) projects. Busi-ness intelligence systems (BI) have emerged and are now used widely in organizations. These systems are designed to support manager's decision-making in their business performance moni-toring activities and their requirements are very different from those of transactional systems. But past research did not consider these differences. Therefore, this paper relies on a comparative approach to assess differences in the level of use and perceived effectiveness of requirements analysis techniques in both business intelligence and transactional contexts. An exploratory quali-tative study was conducted with two phases of semi-structured interviews with experienced practitioners. Our results show that 28% of the techniques differ in their level of use or perceived effectiveness, thus demonstrating the specificity of decision makers' needs. Our results reveal the importance of using techniques appropriate to the context to adequately define requirements and improve projects’ success.","PeriodicalId":404696,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Bus. Intell. Res.","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Bus. Intell. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijbir.294569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Requirements elicitation is a key concern in information technology (IT) projects. Busi-ness intelligence systems (BI) have emerged and are now used widely in organizations. These systems are designed to support manager's decision-making in their business performance moni-toring activities and their requirements are very different from those of transactional systems. But past research did not consider these differences. Therefore, this paper relies on a comparative approach to assess differences in the level of use and perceived effectiveness of requirements analysis techniques in both business intelligence and transactional contexts. An exploratory quali-tative study was conducted with two phases of semi-structured interviews with experienced practitioners. Our results show that 28% of the techniques differ in their level of use or perceived effectiveness, thus demonstrating the specificity of decision makers' needs. Our results reveal the importance of using techniques appropriate to the context to adequately define requirements and improve projects’ success.
比较商业智能和事务环境中的需求分析技术:一个定性的探索性研究
需求提取是信息技术(IT)项目中的一个关键问题。商业智能系统(BI)已经出现并在组织中得到广泛应用。这些系统旨在支持管理者在其业务绩效监控活动中的决策,其需求与事务系统有很大不同。但过去的研究并没有考虑到这些差异。因此,本文依赖于比较方法来评估在商业智能和事务上下文中需求分析技术的使用水平和感知有效性的差异。探索性质的研究进行了两个阶段的半结构化访谈与经验丰富的从业者。我们的研究结果表明,28%的技术在使用水平或感知有效性方面存在差异,从而证明了决策者需求的特殊性。我们的结果揭示了使用适合上下文的技术来充分定义需求和提高项目成功的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信